Бережно, с опорой на науку и практику развиваем психологическую грамотность, чтобы приближаться к той самой жизни, которую хотим жить 🧡
Наши курсы: https://healthyadult.life
Рекламу НЕ размещаем
Created
10 May 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 97 days, net +99. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,476–10,640 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 15:10
10,621
+5
9 Nov 2026, 15:56
10,616
+5
7 Nov 2026, 00:36
10,611
-1
5 Nov 2026, 23:24
10,612
+2
5 Nov 2026, 00:10
10,610
+3
3 Nov 2026, 21:58
10,607
-5
3 Nov 2026, 00:49
10,612
+3
1 Nov 2026, 22:15
10,609
+3
1 Nov 2026, 01:31
10,606
-1
31 Oct 2026, 04:11
10,607
+1
30 Oct 2026, 03:50
10,606
+1
29 Oct 2026, 01:01
10,605
+6
27 Oct 2026, 20:47
10,599
+1
26 Oct 2026, 19:51
10,598
+4
25 Oct 2026, 20:50
10,594
+2
24 Oct 2026, 19:27
10,592
+4
23 Oct 2026, 22:25
10,588
+5
23 Oct 2026, 01:31
10,583
-1
22 Oct 2026, 03:16
10,584
+3
20 Oct 2026, 23:27
10,581
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 8 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.2%
avg views ÷ 10,621 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,610
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 October 2026
Posts held
22 (8 May 2026 – 16 October 2026)
Views total
1,610
Reactions total
53
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 22:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,360
Videos
≈48
Links
≈491
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,631 reactions across 21 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,010
61.9%
🔥
327
20.0%
🙏
106
6.50%
custom 5199926165216715993
53
3.25%
👏
42
2.58%
🥰
22
1.35%
🤣
18
1.10%
✍
11
0.674%
👍
11
0.674%
😁
9
0.552%
💔
7
0.429%
💘
6
0.368%
💯
5
0.307%
👎
2
0.123%
😢
1
0.061%
🦄
1
0.061%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,631 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 16 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
33
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 22 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
32
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @HealthyAdultLife. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 May 2026 to 16 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Как принять, что другие не такие, как мы хотим
Наверное, у каждого есть свой список «вот если бы он/она только…». Чтобы родители был бережнее, партнер эмоциональнее, а водитель впереди вовремя включал поворотник 😈
Хотеть, чтобы другие менялись, нормально. Выражать свои потребности тоже нормально. Проблемы начинаются, когда желание изменений превращается в борьбу: придирки, пиление, закатывание глаз и 40-минутный вн…
Пропадай тревожность тупая 4 способа вести дневник, чтобы справиться с тревогой
Пугающая ситуация прокручивается в голове снова и снова — и чем дольше, тем сложнее остановить внутренний диалог. И вот ты уже продумываешь, какую картонку постелешь себе под мостом... Мы? 🙏
📚 Один из научно-обоснованных способов разорвать этот круг — перенести мысли на бумагу. Ведение дневника используют и как самостоятельный инструмен…
Женщины, к вам вопросов нет
Зато есть вопросы к культуре продуктивности, которая не учитывает особенности женского организма. Что сегодня с вами и обсудим, дорогие 😁
От женщин требуется собрать детей в школу, мужа на работу, отпахать 8 часов в офисе, всех накормить, сделать домашку с детьми, погулять с собакой, сходить в спортзал, ну и хобби ещё заняться обязательно… И так каждый день. Просто базовый минимум, да? 🥲…
4 способа спасти день, который пошёл не так
🧠 Бывает, что из-за одной мелочи с утра — пролитого кофе, неприятного сообщения, плохой погоды — настроение портится на весь день, и дальше всё идёт по наклонной?
📌 Шанна Тиайон, исследовательница благополучия на работе в Wellbeing Works, отмечает: часть конфликтов в командах случается именно из-за того, что людям не удаётся вернуть себе день после неудачного утра. Она п…
6 уроков коммуникации из нового сезона «Теда Лассо»
Дорогие, привет! На связи Алёна Шарикова, и у меня 0 терпения, чтобы обсудить с вами нового «Теда Лассо» ❤️
Я люблю этот сериал не только за доброту и юмор. А за то, как бережно там показаны разговоры и отношения. Как люди ошибаются, замалчивают и как выпутываются. Уже писали про него, и решили продолжить. Собрали примеры коммуникации из первых трёх серий 4 сезона…
Привет, дорогие! Вопрос на подумать: почему антидепрессанты не убирают тревогу до конца, а отпуск не лечит выгорание, даже если это отдых мечты?
Всё потому что психика не работает по принципу «нашли одну причину — исправили». На нас одновременно влияет то, что происходит в теле, в голове и вокруг, и сводить всё к одному уровню — значит упускать часть картины.
📌 В 1977 году психиатр Джордж Энгель ввел понятие Биопс…
⚖️ Этос, пафос и логос: 3 кита убеждения, которым почти 2400 лет (а работают до сих пор)
Хотите верьте, хотите нет, но формула «как убедить кого угодно в чем угодно» была выведена еще в Древней Греции — и с тех пор особо не изменилась.
Уже тогда Аристотель заметил: одни ораторы цепляют железной логикой, другие — трогают до мурашек, третьим верят просто потому что это ОНИ сказали. Он разложил это на три составляющих…
Как насчёт субботних мемов? 👍
Теперь осталось главное — провести эти два прекрасных летних дня так, чтобы подзарядить нашу «внутреннюю батарейку».
Как идеи: прогулка в лесу, медленный завтрак, день без электричества, чтение книги на природе, встречи с друзьями.
У кого уже есть план? Чем займётесь?
Ура, новый поток курса по эффективному общению
Привет, дорогие! Это анонс для тех, кто хочет начать осень с саморазвития и качественно улучшить свои отношения с людьми 📈
⚡️ Встречайте: наш флагманский курс «Pro общение: навыки эффективной коммуникации».
Цель курса — помочь вам освоить навыки ассертивности. Это наиболее эффективный стиль общения, который помогает экологично общаться с другими, уважая свои и чужие г…
Чек-ап отношений: один разговор в неделю, который может многое изменить
Помните, мы писали про «четырёх всадников Апокалипсиса» Джона Готтмана, которые разрушает отношения? 😥 Сегодня — о простом ритуале, чтобы не доводить до этого.
Готтман и коллеги предлагают паре проводить регулярный чек-ап — еженедельную встречу State of the Union («О положении дел в союзе»).
Формат простой, но выстроен не случайно — каждая час…
Головой понимаю, и всё равно не делаю
Знаю, что надо разнообразно питаться, много двигаться, ухаживать за кожей, развиваться, заботиться о близких, убирать квартиру и планировать досуг. Так почему я этого не делаю?!
Есть несколько причин:
1️⃣Внимание застревает в прошлом. Вместо того, чтобы сделать что-то сейчас, мы то и дело мысленно возвращаемся назад и посыпаем голову пеплом за впустую потраченное время.
Не о…
Такого у нас ещё не было: бессрочная психодинамическая группа «Обними свою уязвимость»
Дорогие, во дела! Приглашаем на первую в нашей школе полуоткрытую терапевтическую группу без конца и края срока окончания 😍🤩
Такая группа — пространство для по-настоящему глубокой работы. Она даёт возможность не только справиться с внутренними сложностями, но и увидеть себя в долгосрочных отношениях с другими.
🧩 Что вы получите …
❤23🔥12👏7👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @HealthyAdultLife. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Дорогие, привет! Хотим сделать онлайн-практикум для всех на 2-3 часа. Стоимость будет невысокая. На какую тему вы бы пришли?
Хочу "Радостный практикум" — как культивировать приятное28%
Хочу "Зависть" — как приручить и подружиться15%
Хочу "Отношения в паре" — как сохранять близость18%
Хочу "Вдохновение" — как перестать прокрастинировать и начать идти к мечте37%
Хочу "Страх оценки" — как перестать оглядываться на других44%
Хочу "Перфекционизм" — как отстать от себя и делать то, что важно39%
Хочу "Про деньги" — как разрешить себе тратить, просить повышение, поднимать стоимость26%
Мне не интересен такой формат5%
Предложу свою тему в комментариях2%
The shares total 214%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 16 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Где моё внимание? @pure_cognitions_adhd · 28,474 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 September 2026
Чтобы не выгорать @notburningout · 43,552 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
Чистые Когниции @pure_cognitions · 38,902 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026
Mindspa | Самопомощь @mindspa_ru · 35,038 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 3 September 2026
Alter @psyalter_ru · 26,498 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 September 2026
Доктор Сычев @dr_sychev · 49,439 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026
Краснощеков | Детская психиатрия @doc_kras · 19,309 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 4 October 2026
Мама в Телеграме @mamavtelegrame · 46,578 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 August 2026
Дофамин | Лайфхакер @pofixil · 25,004 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 September 2026
Ок, ясно @yasno_live · 111,571 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
СПРАВИТЬСЯ ПРОЩЕ @handlingbettercenter · 20,141 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 28 September 2026
Психотерапевт Прибытков @pribytkov_psy · 40,400 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 30 August 2026
Дубынин о мозге 🧠 @dubininvaofficial · 44,713 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 August 2026
Йод | Лайфхакер @lh_health · 22,577 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 September 2026
Василиса Бутусова @stillvasilisa · 24,595 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 September 2026
Т—Ж Мозг @t_dopamine · 20,922 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 September 2026
Психиатр Онлайн @psychiatristonline · 20,803 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 September 2026
Газовый гигант (ibs.doc)🪐 @ibs_doc · 21,762 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 23 September 2026
Психиатрия & Нейронауки @psy_and_neuro · 22,555 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 September 2026
Открытые курсы СПб ИДПО для психологов и психотерапевтов @spb_idpo · 27,545 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 September 2026
Библиотека психология/ философия/ медицина @biblio_psychology · 19,824 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 October 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Школа здорового взрослого” (@HealthyAdultLife), 10,621 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HealthyAdultLife.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.