Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

CBT LAB

@CBTLAB

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,821subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001683720333
TypeChannel
Username@CBTLAB
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CBTLAB

Growth

1,8211,8241,822.57 August 2026 — 1,823 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,823 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,824 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,822 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,821 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,821–1,824 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 00:181,821-1
11 Aug 2026, 02:541,822-2
7 Aug 2026, 21:011,824+1
7 Aug 2026, 20:481,823no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:401,823first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 41m
Average length
50m 34s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

391 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
27269.6%
🔥6015.3%
👍5113.0%
👏41.02%
🙏20.512%
😁10.256%
😱10.256%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 391reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 February 2026 to 11 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 May 2026, 23:43 UTC571 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ТФП И КПТ СТРАТЕГИЯ 4 После стратегий 1–3 TFP переходит к следующей задаче: не только замечать активированную межличностную схему, смену ролей и расщепление, но и помогать пациенту постепенно переживать отношения по-новому. Работа начинается в самой сессии, потому что именно здесь быстрее всего активируются привычные глубинные убеждения, автоматические мысли, ожидания и защитные реакции по отношению к другому. Стра

8👍5

11 May 2026, 18:33 UTC529 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

КПТ И ТФП СТРАТЕГИЯ 3 О существовании противоположных диад, которые сосуществуют, но остаются разъединенными. Здесь мы подходим к понятию расщепления. У Кернберга расщепление — это не просто контраст между «хорошим Я» и «плохим Другим» внутри одной сцены. Это разрыв между двумя разными диадами. Одна насыщена ненавистью, угрозой, преследованием, злостью. Другая — любовью, идеализацией, заботой и надеждой. Обе существ

15

11 May 2026, 00:33 UTC510 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

ПОГОВОРИЛИ ПРО ИНТЕГРАЦИЮ ПОДХОДОВ В ПСИХОТЕРАПИИ Кажется, это неизбежно, но как это делать аккуратно? Получилась приятная беседа

12

8 May 2026, 22:43 UTC523 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ТФП И КПТ СТРАТЕГИЯ 2. Стратегия 1 в TFP — найти активную диаду: текущий паттерн отношений в сессии. На языке КПТ это активированная межличностная схема: Я такой → другой такой → я чувствую → я ожидаю → я действую Например: я слабый → другой сильный и опасный → мне страшно → меня будут контролировать → я подчиняюсь или защищаюсь Стратегия 2 — заметить, как внутри этой же диады меняются роли. Сначала пациент пережив

10👍4🔥1

3 May 2026, 04:27 UTC697 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

КПТ И ТФП В прошлом посте я писал о втором шаге первой стратегии TFP: терапевт начинает видеть повторяющийся паттерн отношений, который проявляется в сессии. Третий шаг — назвать действующих лиц и само действие. Смысл шага 3 не в том, чтобы дать “глубокую интерпретацию”. Смысл в том, чтобы, когда у терапевта уже сложилось мнение о том, какие представления себя и другого активны в данный момент, сообщить это пациент

23👍4🔥1

29 Apr 2026, 18:10 UTC707 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ПРОДОЛЖАЮ ПИСАТЬ ПРО СТРАТЕГИИ TFP и их интеграцию в КПТ. Суть первой стратегии — не застревать на симптомах и отдельных реакциях, а смотреть, какой паттерн отношений пациент приносит в сессию. Первый шаг в прошлом посте — выдержать путаницу, не спешить с объяснением и заметить, что происходит с самим терапевтом в контакте. Второй шаг — понять, какой именно паттерн сейчас активировался. TFP исходит из простой идеи:

22🔥7😁1

26 Apr 2026, 17:00 UTC856 views63 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Интеграция ТФП в КПТ Про мой интерес к работе с расстройствами личности вы знаете. В работе с расстройствами личности мы работаем максимально психдинамически - здесь и сейчас и основная работа происходит через терапевтические отношения. В сессии быстро начинают проявляться не только мысли, эмоции и поведение пациента, но и его привычный способ быть рядом с другим человеком. Продолжаю учиться. В терапии сфокусированн

51🔥9🙏2👍1

8 Mar 2026, 19:21 UTC≈1,170 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

16

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CBTLAB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 813,856 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CBT LAB” (@CBTLAB), 1,821 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CBTLAB.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.