Channel
@notburningout
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
44,064subscribers
-37 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001344462212 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @notburningout |
| Created | 21 June 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/notburningout |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 44,064 | +5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:36 | 44,059 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 44,062 | +8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:24 | 44,054 | -11 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:11 | 44,065 | -10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:51 | 44,075 | -11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 44,086 | -13 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:53 | 44,099 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 44,101 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 44,101 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (22 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 196,850 |
| Reactions total | 11,330 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
10,577 reactions across 19 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10,577 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,330reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @notburningout. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ошибка совсем не всегда означает, что решение было плохим. Иногда важная информация или новые обстоятельства появляются уже после того, как мы приняли решение. А само решение, учитывая что мы знали тогда, было разумным. Нет смысла корить себя за ошибку, вы не могли это предвидеть и приняли лучшее решение из возможных на тот момент. Лучше подумать, что можно поменять сейчас с учётом новой информации и новых обстояте…
❤500
Все испытывают страх перед новым. Это нормальная реакция нашего мозга. Важно помнить, что если вы попробуете, есть шанс на успех. А даже если что-то пойдёт не так, вы получите опыт и продвинетесь куда-то дальше, чем если не попробуете
❤574
Если мы делаем в выходные много дел, даже важных и интересных: уборка, спорт, музей, друзья — после выходных часто не чувствуем себя отдохнувшими. Каждое дело само по себе классное, но не осталось времени для отдыха, который восстанавливает энергию. Такой отдых должен быть простым, без новизны и без решений. Помогает заранее оставить на выходных немного свободного времени для восстановления сил. Иначе всё заполнитс…
❤605
Хотеть получать деньги от работы — это нормально. Без достаточной денежной мотивации даже самая интересная работа со временем перестанет радовать и начнёт вызывать негодование Картинка из канала Юли Чиж «Открыточки Чижа»
❤507
Важный навык будущего — не просто пользоваться ИИ, а вовремя останавливаться. Каждая новая итерация почти бесплатная и быстрая: можно ещё раз уточнить, переписать, попросить другой вариант. Поэтому легко незаметно потратить на это много времени и внимания. Важны не только промпты, но и умение расставлять приоритеты и заранее решать, какой результат уже достаточно хорош
❤433
Чтобы бороться с прокрастинацией, важно укрепить связь с вашим «я» в будущем. Попробуйте визуализировать, как выполнение задачи сегодня повлияет на ваше будущее. Представьте, как вы будете чувствовать себя завтра, если сделаете задачу сегодня, и как это повлияет на ваше общее благополучие
❤493
Партнёрский пост Вышел русский перевод книги Элиезера Юдковского и Нейта Соареса «Если кто-то его создаст, все погибнут» (в оригинале — If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies). Книга — про то, почему создание сверхчеловеческого ИИ при текущем понимании того, как он работает, закончится очень плохо. Причём бояться стоит не злого ИИ и не ИИ в руках у злых людей, а интеллекта, цели которого мы не можем понять и который с…
❤80
ИИ снижает выгорание, когда берёт на себя повторяющиеся и рутинные задачи. Но если за ним нужно всё время следить, проверять и переключаться между инструментами, это может, наоборот, утомлять. Перед автоматизацией полезно спросить себя: эта штука действительно освободит мне силы или добавит ещё один процесс, который нужно постоянно проверять?
❤468
Попробуйте вести список достижений и хвастовства: записывайте туда всё, что вам кажется значимым в работе и около неё. Даже если вы замечаете свои достижения и признаёте их, со временем они забываются. Эти записи можно перечитывать, чтобы вспоминать, что у вас получалось: снова порадоваться и поразмышлять, что вас увлекало, чем вы гордились и как поменялась ваша работа
❤607
Иногда мы думаем, что смелость — это противоположность страха. Но обычно смелость ощущается не как уверенность или спокойствие. Она ощущается именно как страх. Отличается не чувство, а то, что мы с ним делаем. Смелость — это готовность действовать, когда страшно. Когда вам страшно перед важным шагом, это не всегда значит, что вы не готовы. Часто этот страх и есть смелость
❤749
На работе всегда будут проблемы, а в мире вообще ужас. Но жизнь всё равно не стоит откладывать на потом. Можно пробовать веселиться и получать удовольствие сейчас, несмотря ни на что
❤1,000
Если вас беспокоит какая-то мысль, полезно записать её на бумаге. В голове проблема обычно расплывчата и крутится по кругу. Когда мы формулируем её конкретными словами и записываем, она перестаёт быть смутным фоном и превращается в то, с чем можно работать. На конкретных словах легче удерживать внимание, чем на чём-то смутном. Поэтому с записанной проблемой проще что-то делать, чем с тем, что фоном крутится в голов…
❤493
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @notburningout. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 11,460 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Чтобы не выгорать” (@notburningout), 44,064 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/notburningout.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.