Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
65 measurements spanning 98 days, net -549. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 43,470–44,183 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 11:40
43,552
-12
9 Nov 2026, 17:15
43,564
-7
8 Nov 2026, 06:44
43,571
-3
7 Nov 2026, 00:06
43,574
+1
5 Nov 2026, 21:11
43,573
-10
4 Nov 2026, 17:38
43,583
-16
3 Nov 2026, 16:49
43,599
-1
2 Nov 2026, 18:21
43,600
-17
1 Nov 2026, 21:25
43,617
-2
31 Oct 2026, 21:28
43,619
-9
31 Oct 2026, 00:45
43,628
+2
30 Oct 2026, 03:29
43,626
+25
29 Oct 2026, 04:21
43,601
-23
28 Oct 2026, 03:17
43,624
-1
27 Oct 2026, 00:27
43,625
-12
26 Oct 2026, 02:08
43,637
-4
25 Oct 2026, 04:47
43,641
-14
24 Oct 2026, 07:28
43,655
+1
23 Oct 2026, 06:00
43,654
-5
22 Oct 2026, 08:01
43,659
first reading
Engagement
111 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 193 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.0%
avg views ÷ 43,552 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,270
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 111 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
111 (22 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
264,650
Reactions total
15,034
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 21:24 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
328
Videos
22
Links
56
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
55,819 reactions across 110 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
55,819
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 111 of the 111 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56,572 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 111 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
99
across the posts below
Posts paid on
48
of 111 we hold a reading for · 43%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @notburningout. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 111 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 32 posts held from the last 30 days (9.38%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Корпоративная культура, которая провоцирует задержки на работе и отсутствие отдыха, — пагубная. В долгосрочной перспективе она работает и против людей, и против компании.
В долгосрочной перспективе лучше культура, которая поощряет здоровый график работы, адекватную оценку ресурсов и своевременное восстановление сил
В мире, где нашу ценность часто измеряют продуктивностью и пользой, легко почувствовать себя заменимым.
Общение с близкими людьми помогает вспомнить, что вы важны не только тем, что делаете, умеете или создаёте. Вы важны просто так
Мы часто оцениваем по результатам то, чем занмиаемся. Даже отдых.
Попробуйте иногда заниматься чем-то, в чём вы совершенно не стремитесь преуспеть. Рисовать без цели нарисовать красиво, играть без цели победить или петь без цели научиться петь лучше.
Важно, чтобы в жизни были занятия, в которых нравится сам процесс. Это важно, чтобы расслабиться и по-настоящему отдохнуть
По мотивам поста из канала Центра обучения …
Когда вы что-то планируете, помните, что план — это не догма.
Когда план есть, это полезно. Но жизнь полна неожиданностей, и мы не можем предусмотреть всё заранее.
Вы всегда можете поменять и адаптировать план
Прямая и открытая коммуникация в команде — это важно. Но «прямо» не означает «грубо».
Вместо того, чтобы говорить «всё плохо», лучше перечислить конкретные моменты, которые нужно доработать.
Это не только уважительно, но и продуктивнее: поможет сделать четкие шаги в сторону улучшения
Иногда полезно остановиться и проверить направление.
Легко продолжать двигаться куда-то на автопилоте просто потому, что мы когда-то решили так. Хотя по дороге могли измениться обстоятельства, наши возможности, интересы или мы сами.
Можно спросить себя: Я всё ещё хочу туда? Если бы я выбирал сейчас, я бы снова выбрал этот путь?
Не обязательно сразу придумывать новый пункт назначения и маршрут. Иногда просто важно …
Если вы чувствуете, что вам сложно вставать и идти на работу, — это важно заметить и не думать, что это нормально.
Вы проводите на работе большую часть жизни и имеете право на то, чтобы хорошо себя чувствовать там.
Не оставляйте это просто так: поисследуйте проблему или обратитесь к психотерапевту
Реклама
Как не растеряться за границей: лайфхаки для работы и жизни.
В канале MissCommunication Кристина Роппельт рассказывает о межкультурной коммуникации в бизнесе и повседневности.
Кристина посетила 63 страны, жила и работала в США в Кремниевой долине, Австралии, Южной Африке, училась в Великобритании и Южной Корее, а теперь развивает бизнес в Дании. Работает Кристина на трех языках, а в анамнезе у нее еще 3.
…
Часто, когда мы думаем, что недостаточно хороши, мы стараемся сделать что-то ещё: поработать больше, стать полезнее, больше зарабатывать, лучше выглядеть или ещё кому-то помочь.
Но не всегда это чувство можно исправить новыми достижениями.
Иногда полезнее заметить само требование к себе и проверить «а действительно ли нужно его слушать?»
Если у вас что-то хорошо получается, это не значит, что вы обязаны делать это своей профессией.
Важно не только то, насколько хорошо вы что-то умеете делать, но и нравится ли вам сам процесс, подходит ли такой образ жизни и сколько сил он у вас забирает.
Что у вас получается и чем вы хотите заниматься — это два разных вопроса. И на них могут быть разные ответы
По мотивам поста из канала «Филолог в найме»
Привет! Мы сделали место, где можно купить плакаты «Чтобы не выгорать». Продаются по себестоимости, доставка пока по России и СНГ: https://notburningout.printdirect.ru/
Пока там три плаката. Один — с кучей идей, о которых полезно иногда вспоминать, чтобы не выгорать. И ещё два (в разных цветах) — со слоганами нашего канала. Лучше печатать в формате 30 × 45 см, чтобы текст был удобно читать.
Расскажите, что думаете …
Страх перед новым — это нормально. Когда страшно начинать, помните, что у вас есть право на ошибку.
Пусть не всё получится с первого раза, но каждая — даже неудачная — попытка приближает вас к цели
❤532
Showing the 12 most recent of 111 posts we hold for @notburningout. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@notburningout edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
22 August 2026
Most recent edit
22 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 5 posts on @notburningout as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
4 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
10 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@notburningout named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@iiiiiiija named in 5 posts, 8 August 2026 – 14 August 2026 · confirmed gone 15 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Руконожковые комиксы @eto_krivo · 34,277 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 3 September 2026
Мама в Телеграме @mamavtelegrame · 46,578 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 August 2026
Наши страхи \ Медиа @moystrakh · 60,344 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
sektaschool @sektaschool · 23,014 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 September 2026
Мозг на полную @full_brains · 23,167 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 September 2026
Цифровой этикет @digitaletiquette · 24,313 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 16 September 2026
0% токсичности @stop_toxic · 33,552 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 3 September 2026
Купрум @tolkosprosit · 42,773 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
Намочи манту @namochimanturu · 56,208 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
Alter @psyalter_ru · 26,498 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 September 2026
Кинжал @Le_kinzhal · 46,010 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
Ок, ясно @yasno_live · 111,571 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
Daily Reminder @justakindreminder · 36,340 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 September 2026
Тамара, какого хрена? @od_tkh · 22,729 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 September 2026
З—Ж @t_zdorov · 19,360 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 2 October 2026
I’m CEO, beach @imceobeach · 64,945 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 August 2026
The Content is The Queen @thecontentisthequeen · 21,451 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 September 2026
Нетология @netology_ru · 26,720 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
Дмитрий Компаниец / Mindset @dmitrykompaniets · 43,967 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
Психология @PsyEducation · 58,838 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
Т—Ж Мозг @t_dopamine · 20,931 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 September 2026
Нагуглила карьеру @dreamcatchme · 27,708 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 September 2026
английский для дебилов @debilenglish · 60,768 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026
Завтрак с Килиной @zavtrak_s_Kilinoy · 62,065 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 65 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Чтобы не выгорать” (@notburningout), 43,552 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/notburningout.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.