Channel
@nastenkinapomoika
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
37,252subscribers
-941 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001367710636 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nastenkinapomoika |
| Created | 9 August 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nastenkinapomoika |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 09:06 | 37,252 | -14 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 01:38 | 37,266 | -16 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 02:17 | 37,282 | -18 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 22:16 | 37,300 | +8 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 22:19 | 37,292 | -11 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 20:29 | 37,303 | -12 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 18:07 | 37,315 | -3 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 20:38 | 37,318 | -7 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 23:49 | 37,325 | -14 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 23:14 | 37,339 | -8 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 22:46 | 37,347 | -2 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 01:10 | 37,349 | -4 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 23:54 | 37,353 | -20 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 02:28 | 37,373 | -17 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 04:37 | 37,390 | -2 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 04:40 | 37,392 | -14 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 06:57 | 37,406 | -6 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 09:45 | 37,412 | -1 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 01:00 | 37,413 | +13 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 01:10 | 37,400 | first reading |
174 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 175 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 174 (3 August 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 683,330 |
| Reactions total | 81,248 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 23:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
227,636 reactions across 173 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5255965004414329346 | 61,066 | 26.8% | |
| custom 6208520559471364583 | 42,018 | 18.5% | |
| 😁 | 26,525 | 11.7% | |
| custom 5773652573835758861 | 25,399 | 11.2% | |
| 🤣 | 21,718 | 9.54% | |
| custom 5449837182455920028 | 18,164 | 7.98% | |
| custom 5330546626178064335 | 16,868 | 7.41% | |
| custom 5312232215613026839 | 15,878 | 6.98% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 173 of the 174 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 227,636 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 174 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nastenkinapomoika. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 174 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzqxQAeBt | 1 | 4 August 2026 | 4 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFJshSRF | 1 | 19 August 2026 | 19 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 174 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 71 posts held from the last 30 days (4.23%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Я два дня ела на очень мало калорий и чувствую фантомное сдутие мышц… 😔😔😔😐 Хожу проверяю целый день 🌝
😁254custom 5255965004414329346132🤣51custom 577365257383575886123custom 531223221561302683920custom 620852055947136458315custom 533054662617806433510custom 54498371824559200281
Маша прислала мне плодов 🍟 Есть не хочется Но таблетки на голодный желудок нельзя Кстати в детстве я ужасно завидовала детям, которые вечно болели. Но у нас был строгач, чтобы прогулять школу причина нужна была уважительная, настолько уважительная, что однажды утром, когда я проснулась вся в сыпи, меня все равно отправили в школу (справедливости ради ответствен тогда был папа, мама вероятно бы сжалилась), оказалось,…
custom 6208520559471364583516custom 5255965004414329346180😁89custom 533054662617806433535custom 544983718245592002831custom 577365257383575886130custom 531223221561302683912
Уровень драмы моей ужасной болезни…..
😁1,000🤣459custom 6208520559471364583193custom 577365257383575886149custom 525596500441432934633custom 531223221561302683930custom 544983718245592002821
За три минуты никто не пожалел даже!! Только шлюхоботы меня любят(( Ладно Екатерина пожалела, вот её и буду любить
😁610🤣226custom 5773652573835758861192custom 531223221561302683959custom 525596500441432934632custom 544983718245592002830custom 620852055947136458317
У меня отвратительная сиделка, он просто ходит и трогает меня и прыгает мне на живот, а мне даже прикосновение трусов причиняет боль, я переношу температуру хуже, чем мужчины 36.9, а это о чем-то да и говорит. Кто меня сглазил?? Признавайтесь!! Ну хотяб это реально какой-то вирус, а не просто суточная мигрень в подарок. Вот вам и дорогие качалки! Клоповник! Рассадник!! Какую-то сифу подкинули мне
custom 5330546626178064335904custom 5449837182455920028335custom 5312232215613026839221🤣48custom 577365257383575886147custom 525596500441432934644custom 620852055947136458344
Вы вообще не помогли!!! У вас у всех должен был быть один ответ! Что за плюрализм устроили??
🤣855😁177custom 5330546626178064335113custom 577365257383575886162custom 525596500441432934617custom 54498371824559200286custom 62085205594713645831
Какие????
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🤣131custom 620852055947136458352custom 577365257383575886135custom 544983718245592002812😁3custom 52559650044143293463
Мне снова нужна ваша помощь, телезрители! Нам нужны голубые лонги про тревогу? Или белые?
custom 5330546626178064335390custom 5255965004414329346127custom 620852055947136458383custom 577365257383575886126custom 54498371824559200286
Я кстати сразу обратила внимание на то, что новый кампейн Диор сгенерирован, даже без пальцев-косичек. Это просто заметно. Вот у Прада сразу видно, что это покадровая анимация и нет эффекта зловещей долины. Удивляет только то, что учетом того, как продвинулся ии и сколько у них бабла они (диор) правда выкатили такой голимый суррогат. Ну это же правда очень дешево выглядело Какая-то региональная реклама магазина канцт…
custom 6208520559471364583448custom 5255965004414329346139custom 531223221561302683993custom 577365257383575886146😁18custom 533054662617806433515custom 54498371824559200285
Я собрала все бинго из списка метеозависимости Какая же я рохля 🤡 Примерно с 5 утра у меня не проходит головная боль Такого раньше не было, максимум – я до 20 лет предсказывала погоду сломанной в 2,5 года ногой, но такого замеса я не ожидала. Есть какие-то дельные советы? Например лоботомия?
custom 5255965004414329346469custom 5449837182455920028211custom 6208520559471364583140custom 533054662617806433528custom 577365257383575886124😁14🤣5
Я купила абонемент на месяц в классный зал (на месяц потому что через месяц я улетаю почти на месяц) и шлифанула это событие пюре с тефтельками 🍓😍 Попробую сплит тренировки в этот месяц (отдельно низ отдельно верх) Чувствую что пора, веса уже серьезные и сил просто не остается качественно доделать верх. Так что качалочный бубнежь возвращается… надеюсь вы счастливы
custom 6208520559471364583745custom 5773652573835758861238😁138custom 531223221561302683943custom 525596500441432934620custom 544983718245592002815custom 533054662617806433511
Чаще всего природно гладкие волосы считаются самыми непроблемными: редко путаются, шелковистые из-за того, что в них от природы много кератина. Ну прям подарок, а не волосы. И это всё почти так, кроме того, что при контакте с большинством тканей у меня образуются весьма завидные колтуны. Чаще всего страдает затылок из-за верхней одежды. Буквально 20–30 минут вне дома — и я уже могу приглашать ласточек переждать зим…
custom 5255965004414329346238custom 620852055947136458374custom 531223221561302683959custom 577365257383575886118custom 53305466261780643358😁4custom 54498371824559200284
Showing the 12 most recent of 174 posts we hold for @nastenkinapomoika. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 2 posts on @nastenkinapomoika as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какие????
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Телезрители, соцопрос: Вам бы больше хотелось в перовом дропе мерча видеть лонгсливы или футболки? Мы немного ограничены по количеству предметов в первом дропе, так что я сейчас решаю
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 174 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Настенькина помойка” (@nastenkinapomoika), 37,252 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nastenkinapomoika.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.