Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Психотерапевт Наталья Зайцева

Channel

Психотерапевт Наталья Зайцева

@psy_factum

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

24,116subscribers

-212 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001134714132
TypeChannel
Username@psy_factum
DescriptionКанал врача-психотерапевта, психиатра с 19-летним опытом Натальи Зайцевой ▪️КПТ, РЭПТ, DBT, доказательная медицина, цифровая психотерапия https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=6736e5057de0911509f17798&registryType=bloggersPermission
Created17 July 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 August 2026
Measurements held20
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/psy_factum

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

24,11624,32824,2226 August 2026 — 24,328 subscribers6 August 2026 — 24,328 subscribers7 August 2026 — 24,316 subscribers8 August 2026 — 24,306 subscribers9 August 2026 — 24,289 subscribers10 August 2026 — 24,279 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24,269 subscribers12 August 2026 — 24,254 subscribers13 August 2026 — 24,245 subscribers14 August 2026 — 24,219 subscribers16 August 2026 — 24,202 subscribers17 August 2026 — 24,176 subscribers18 August 2026 — 24,167 subscribers19 August 2026 — 24,152 subscribers20 August 2026 — 24,151 subscribers21 August 2026 — 24,147 subscribers22 August 2026 — 24,145 subscribers24 August 2026 — 24,132 subscribers25 August 2026 — 24,126 subscribers26 August 2026 — 24,116 subscribers6 August 202626 August 2026
20 measurements spanning 20 days, net -212. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,084–24,360 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 06:5324,116-10
25 Aug 2026, 05:3324,126-6
24 Aug 2026, 07:1224,132-13
22 Aug 2026, 18:2824,145-2
21 Aug 2026, 09:2524,147-4
20 Aug 2026, 06:1124,151-1
19 Aug 2026, 09:2524,152-15
18 Aug 2026, 10:1424,167-9
17 Aug 2026, 11:5724,176-26
16 Aug 2026, 04:0424,202-17
14 Aug 2026, 17:1624,219-26
13 Aug 2026, 06:3324,245-9
12 Aug 2026, 09:1224,254-15
11 Aug 2026, 09:1224,269-10
10 Aug 2026, 08:4624,279-10
9 Aug 2026, 09:1124,289-17
8 Aug 2026, 05:4624,306-10
7 Aug 2026, 02:4824,316-12
6 Aug 2026, 04:0024,328no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:5824,328first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 10 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.0%
avg views ÷ 24,116 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,640
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held24 (10 May 202622 August 2026)
Views total23,780
Reactions total1,141
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
483
Videos
233
Links
300

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
11m 42s
Average length
1m 18s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,924 reactions across 24 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,88147.9%
🤣3709.43%
🤯2566.52%
😁2486.32%
🔥2215.63%
🤡2015.12%
👍1694.31%
🤬1614.10%
😢1072.73%
🥰711.81%
😱411.04%
🤔310.79%
🤩270.688%
🍓240.612%
🙈230.586%
👌220.561%
💯210.535%
🕊180.459%
❤‍🔥120.306%
🥴60.153%
4 further kinds140.357%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,924reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC≈1,850 views89 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Video

Такие приёмы были очень популярны в 80-х годах, и, к сожалению, их до сих пор рекомендуют психологи для якобы «экологичного» проживания и выражения гнева. Но исследования показали, что подобные «выпускания гнева наружу» только усугубляют ситуацию, и люди чувствуют себя или опустошенными, обессиленными, или наоборот ещё более возбуждёнными. Плюс ко всему эти действия закаляют всё тот же самый проблемный механизм, пр

71👍12😱3😢2👌1

20 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC≈2,190 views66 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Video

Ко мне часто обращаются с проблемой тревоги перед ответственными мероприятиями, где можно получить негативную обратную связь, или неприятными встречами, на которые нельзя не пойти. И всегда очень жалко, что люди тратят не самые маленькие деньги на сеанс с психотерапевтом, когда эта проблема может быть решена вот такими простыми практиками. Нервничать перед подобными встречами — это нормально, и, как правило, психот

66

18 Aug 2026, 08:57 UTC≈2,570 views162 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

Что-то для мам в декрете 😁 🔗Узнать больше про такие практики можно на моём бесплатном вебинаре

120👍25🔥12🥰5

17 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC≈2,930 views90 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Video

Внимание — это новая нефть. Слышали такое выражение? Его часто употребляют в контексте рекламы. Считается, что в цифровую эпоху внимание — это самый ценный и дефицитный ресурс, за который борются социальные сети, медиа и корпорации. Его пытаются привлечь, удержать и управлять им. И речь не про внимание в целом, а внимание каждого отдельно взятого человека. В том числе и ваше. То есть огромное число людей, работающ

66👍13🍓8👌3

16 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC≈2,560 views298 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

Я забыла показать вам нашего нового котика🙈

205🥰62🤩23👀3🔥2😨2👍1

16 Aug 2026, 08:21 UTC≈2,910 views96 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Video

Многие люди называют психотерапией практически любое общение с психотерапевтом или психологом. Но параллельно с этим определённой кастой психологов и психотерапевтов транслируется идея того, что каждый человек должен пройти курс психотерапии и залечить свои детские/родовые/кармические и тп травмы. Как будто они есть у всех. Об этом можно спорить сколько угодно, но кроме «а мне помогло» или «у меня было много клиент

78🔥12🍓6

15 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC≈2,790 views109 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

Попробуйте делать эту простую практику-пятиминутку во время своего обеденного перерыва или в середине рабочего дня. Она поможет вам действительно отдохнуть от работы. Очень часто во время перерыва мы продолжаем думать о работе: о том, что там происходит, что нужно успеть сделать, что не успели доделать и т.д. И получается, что вы телом ушли на перерыв, а мыслями продолжаете работать. Поэтому такая передышка не даё

84🔥15🍓10

14 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC≈2,770 views80 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Video

Почему приёмы психологов на вас не срабатывают? Причина N1 — вы делаете техники по требованию, а не по назначению. Что это значит, рассказала в видео. Ещё больше информации на моём бесплатном вебинаре.

🔥5023👌7

13 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC≈3,210 views151 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Video

Я вернулась к вам! Вы рады? И начнём мы сразу с полезной практики, которую можно делать при беспокойстве. Беспокойство — это неприятные мысли, которые бесконтрольно крутятся в вашей голове. Как правило, это мысли о неприятностях и опасностях, с которыми вы можете столкнуться в будущем из-за того, что происходит сейчас или происходило в прошлом. То есть беспокоясь, мы как будто попадаем в а-ля виртуальную реальност

132👍10❤‍🔥5👌3🥴1

3 Jun 2026, 18:26 UTC≈6,440 views69 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Хотите принять участие в моём бесплатном 7-дневном челлендже осознанности? Тогда получайте приглашение в мой закрытый канал в этом боте и присоединяйтесь к нам: Upd. Челлендж закончился.

59👌8🤩2

20 May 2026, 13:29 UTC≈8,610 views107 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Я сейчас сосредоточена на своем закрытом канале, и все силы пока уходят туда. Здесь буду появляться по мере возможностей. В закрытом канале обсуждаем альтернативные способы помощи — что можно сделать при тревоге, депрессии, психосоматике, выгорании и т.п., если боитесь пить препараты, а на психотерапию нет времени и/или денег. Получить приглашение в закрытый канал можно здесь

98❤‍🔥7🤩2

20 May 2026, 12:24 UTC≈7,100 views49 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

49

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @psy_factum. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@psy_factum edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
17 August 2026
Most recent edit
17 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 May 2026, 15:04 UTCAnonymous Poll741 voters

Что вам мешает принимать людей такими, какие они есть?

  1. Мне кажется, я таким образом одобряю их неправильное поведение/точки зрения50%
  2. Я как будто предаю себя и свои принципы28%
  3. Возникают очень сильные и даже болезненные переживания34%
  4. Не знаю, не понимаю, как это делать24%
  5. Меня никто не учил это делать21%
  6. Не умею это делать22%
  7. Другое (напишите в комментариях)2%

The shares total 181%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2026 to 22 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,590,789 of 1,604,598entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Доктор Комиссарова ☀️
@doctor_komissarova · 97,788
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 August 2026
ДОКТОР ХАН
@doctorkhanstanislav · 56,023
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 23 August 2026
ImmunoBee
@immunobee1 · 104,370
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
doctor_annamama
@doctor_annamama · 83,286
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
Дерматология Быканова
@dr_bykanov · 62,500
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Психотерапевт Наталья Зайцева” (@psy_factum), 24,116 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psy_factum.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.