Posted without readable text
🙏217❤196🕊60👍32❤🔥21

Channel
@doc_kras
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
18,810subscribers
+26 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001648735290 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @doc_kras |
| Description | Психиатрия для самых маленьких Запись ко мне и другим нашим врачам на сайте https://mind-clinic.ru/ |
| Created | 11 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/doc_kras |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:27 | 18,810 | +8 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:54 | 18,802 | -10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:12 | 18,812 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:51 | 18,811 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 18,807 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:20 | 18,804 | +16 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 18,788 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 18,784 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:37 | 18,784 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 18 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (18 April 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 30,430 |
| Reactions total | 2,365 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 23:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
13,850 reactions across 14 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4,511 | 32.6% | |
| 🔥 | 2,608 | 18.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1,105 | 7.98% | |
| 🤯 | 800 | 5.78% | |
| 💔 | 783 | 5.65% | |
| 😱 | 762 | 5.50% | |
| 👏 | 616 | 4.45% | |
| 😭 | 491 | 3.55% | |
| 🙏 | 478 | 3.45% | |
| 👍 | 467 | 3.37% | |
| 🎉 | 445 | 3.21% | |
| 🤬 | 301 | 2.17% | |
| 🗿 | 128 | 0.924% | |
| 😨 | 124 | 0.895% | |
| 🍾 | 72 | 0.52% | |
| 🕊 | 60 | 0.433% | |
| 😢 | 49 | 0.354% | |
| 🤔 | 19 | 0.137% | |
| 👌 | 12 | 0.087% | |
| 💋 | 10 | 0.072% | |
| 1 further kind | 9 | 0.065% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,850reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 18 April 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
🙏217❤196🕊60👍32❤🔥21
Василий Генералов сбежал из страны, возбуждено уголовное дело Внимание, это не учебная тревога, не мечты и не фантазии. Два года назад я публично рассказал о том, что происходит в клинике "ПланетаМед" - и вот, наконец-то мы добились результата. В СМИ появилась информация о том, что от действий Генералова пострадали сотни семей, вслед за этим - официальное заявление Следственного Комитета о том, что на некоего врача…
❤🔥900👏457🔥302❤171🥰9
Искусственный интеллект на приеме анализирует вашу беседу с врачом и самостоятельно заполняет карту - согласились бы?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤58👍31🔥24🤔10😨2
Как насчет высоких технологий? Сегодня не будет остросюжетных жизненных историй, общемировых проблем и информации. Вместо этого я бы хотел спросить совет у вас. Приемы у специалистов часто проходят достаточно сумбурно. Родитель с ребенком - это базовый минимум, но бывает, что приходят оба родителя (что я горячо поддерживаю), а иногда в качестве группы поддержки приводят дядь/теть/бабушек/дедушек/нянь/тьюторов (и эт…
🔥178👍100❤55
Пока я, аки Пабло Эскобар, ожидаю ответа от РОП (спойлер - его не будет, потому что эти ребята не привыкли отвечать на вопросы), предлагаю отвлечься от злодеев и немного обсудить героев. С 2025 года (и как минимум до 2027) действуют клинические рекомендации от альянса других двух ассоциаций: АПсиП (это психиатры и психологи) и СПР (Союз Педиатров России). Это, что называется, "клинреки здорового человека" против РОП…
❤414🔥156👏51👍33👌12
Вызываю на дуэль. РОП опубликовали вторую версию клинических рекомендаций по РАС, где учли некоторые замечания вроде дозировок препаратов, добавили таблицы (вероятно, нейросетевые, но и на том спасибо) но оставили все те же устаревшие лекарства и методы, при этом даже увеличив количество критики поведенческой терапии и других эффективных вмешательств. Подробно разбирать мелкие изменения я не вижу смысла, к тому же …
🔥660❤262❤🔥126👍48💔11
Что думает Минздрав про РАС? Чего я все о себе, да о себе. Сегодня предлагаю посмотреть на то, что говорят официальные представители Министерства Здравоохранения на критику клинических рекомендаций, да и вообще ситуации с аутизмом в нашей стране. Краткое содержание: 1. Галоперидол - это колесо, которому 4000 лет. 2. Инструкция - это священная скрижаль. 3. Ваше мнение - искусственный ажиотаж. 4. Мы победили радугу (…
🤬301❤147🔥77🤯60🤔9
31 Как всегда, раз в году одновременно происходят три события: день защиты детей, мой день рождения, и день, когда запрещена продажа алкоголя. И правда, если я пишу такие посты трезвым, то записи под пивко могут нарушить незыблемые законы мироздания. В этот день, как и на новый год (получается, раз в полгода) приходит пора рефлексировать о себе и жизни. Событий уйма, но главное не это. Главное - это то, сколько сл…
❤822🎉445🔥98🍾72🙏16
Немного о профессиональной этике. Мне часто говорят, что я слишком критикую коллег, перехожу на личности, выношу сор из избы и вообще веду себя некрасиво, потому что вопросы надо решать между собой лично, а не посвящать в это других людей. Ну и вообще, "давайте жить дружно", как завещал кот Леопольд. Вполне понимаю эту точку зрения, так что решил рассказать вам об уровне дискуссии с профессорским сообществом в личн…
😱762🤯566❤213🗿128😨100
Приятной новостью было то, что мероприятие в Госдуме, оказывается, записывалось на видео. А значит, могу поделиться с вами полной версией своего выступления. Такая возможность выпадает не очень часто, поэтому решил рассказать о тех проблемах детской психиатрии, что кажутся мне наиболее болезненными - отсутствие стандартов помощи (даже с клиническими рекомендациями все лечат как попало), излишние госпитализации, неве…
🔥496❤276👍79👏43💋10
Клинического психолога посадили на 12 лет за теракт Публикации с такими заголовками вышли в телеграм-каналах и местных СМИ. Такие истории уже давно не удивляют - телефонные мошенники обрабатывают жертву (в данном случае - 12 дней нон-стопом), выманивают деньги, а потом заставляют пойти на правонарушение. Но об этом случае я хочу написать отдельно. Для СМИ это "психолог" и "блогер", а для меня это Диана Чистякова - …
💔772😭491🤯174❤56👍5
Не так давно вышел документальный сериал "В Хогвартс я не попал". До релиза все звучало отлично. Тут и важная тема, освещающая жизнь реальных невербальных людей с РАС и их семей. Звёздный актёрский состав, что стоит признать даже заядлому кологривофобу вроде меня. Информационная поддержка Центра Проблем Аутизма, которые многое сделали для популяризации поведенческой терапии 15 лет назад. Постер, трейлеры - все выгля…
❤465🔥133👏65😢49😨22
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @doc_kras. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Искусственный интеллект на приеме анализирует вашу беседу с врачом и самостоятельно заполняет карту - согласились бы?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 18 April 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 5,663 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 37 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Краснощеков | Детская психиатрия” (@doc_kras), 18,810 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doc_kras.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.