National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 98 days, net +525. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,703–19,402 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 22:04
19,309
-12
10 Nov 2026, 02:49
19,321
+9
7 Nov 2026, 07:06
19,312
+3
6 Nov 2026, 06:44
19,309
+9
5 Nov 2026, 08:17
19,300
+4
4 Nov 2026, 04:30
19,296
+6
3 Nov 2026, 06:01
19,290
+1
2 Nov 2026, 08:38
19,289
+1
1 Nov 2026, 10:51
19,288
+2
31 Oct 2026, 07:37
19,286
+2
30 Oct 2026, 06:45
19,284
+5
29 Oct 2026, 08:28
19,279
+4
28 Oct 2026, 06:20
19,275
+7
27 Oct 2026, 08:16
19,268
+6
26 Oct 2026, 10:27
19,262
+2
25 Oct 2026, 09:04
19,260
-5
24 Oct 2026, 08:04
19,265
+8
23 Oct 2026, 10:35
19,257
+5
22 Oct 2026, 13:35
19,252
+3
21 Oct 2026, 03:45
19,249
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 18 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
78.7%
avg views ÷ 19,309 subscribers
Avg views / post
15,200
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 October 2026
Posts held
20 (18 April 2026 – 14 October 2026)
Views total
15,200
Reactions total
531
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 16:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
23m 14s
Average length
7m 45s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
19,430 reactions across 20 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
6,573
33.8%
🔥
4,685
24.1%
👏
1,435
7.39%
❤🔥
1,238
6.37%
🤯
813
4.18%
💔
794
4.09%
😱
772
3.97%
👍
589
3.03%
🙏
577
2.97%
😭
504
2.59%
🎉
449
2.31%
🤬
302
1.55%
🗿
130
0.669%
😨
125
0.643%
😁
114
0.587%
🍾
73
0.376%
🕊
73
0.376%
😢
50
0.257%
💘
27
0.139%
👎
24
0.124%
7 further kinds
83
0.427%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19,430 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 April 2026 to 14 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (100.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Кора - справочник и дневник наблюдений для родителей.
Добраться до детского психиатра с ребёнком - тот ещё квест. А после приёма начинается следующий: что означает диагноз? Зачем это лекарство? Как понять, что помощь работает, и что рассказать врачу в следующий раз?
Последний год я работал над приложением, которое помогает с этим разобраться. Сегодня оно открыто для всех.
Справочник. Диагнозы, лекарства, обследова…
События этой осени
Пока я постигаю глубины отечественной психиатрии на конференции НЦПЗ (это те самые шизофренологи, о которых я уже рассказывал) и пытаюсь сохранить свой рассудок, решил рассказать вам о тех мероприятиях, где буду выступать сам. Осень выдастся насыщенной.
1. Онлайн-конференция "Бум на СДВГ" пройдет 9-11 октября и будет интересна всем, кто так или иначе сталкивался с этим диагнозом. Спикеры как на п…
Клинические рекомендации по аутизму от РОП не приняли!
На последнем заседании научно-практического совета Минздрава России рассматривались два проекта клинических рекомендаций по РАС: один от РОП (тот самый многострадальный), предлагающий откатить весь прогресс лет на 40, второй от Союза Педиатров России+АПСиП - авторов текущего современного и качественного документа, сделавших новую итерацию еще актуальнее.
В резу…
Василий Генералов арестован.
Как минимум до конца сентября он проведет в СИЗО. Ему грозит срок до 10 лет лишения свободы по трем статьям УК РФ - мошенничество, причинение тяжкого вреда здоровью по неосторожности и неправомерный оборот средств платежей.
Медицинский директор клиники и жена Генералова Татьяна Ободзинская (вот это поворот!) отправлена под домашний арест.
Сайт клиники ПланетаМед и их интернет-магазин Б…
Василий Генералов сбежал из страны, возбуждено уголовное дело
Внимание, это не учебная тревога, не мечты и не фантазии. Два года назад я публично рассказал о том, что происходит в клинике "ПланетаМед" - и вот, наконец-то мы добились результата.
В СМИ появилась информация о том, что от действий Генералова пострадали сотни семей, вслед за этим - официальное заявление Следственного Комитета о том, что на некоего врача…
Как насчет высоких технологий?
Сегодня не будет остросюжетных жизненных историй, общемировых проблем и информации. Вместо этого я бы хотел спросить совет у вас.
Приемы у специалистов часто проходят достаточно сумбурно. Родитель с ребенком - это базовый минимум, но бывает, что приходят оба родителя (что я горячо поддерживаю), а иногда в качестве группы поддержки приводят дядь/теть/бабушек/дедушек/нянь/тьюторов (и эт…
Пока я, аки Пабло Эскобар, ожидаю ответа от РОП (спойлер - его не будет, потому что эти ребята не привыкли отвечать на вопросы), предлагаю отвлечься от злодеев и немного обсудить героев.
С 2025 года (и как минимум до 2027) действуют клинические рекомендации от альянса других двух ассоциаций: АПсиП (это психиатры и психологи) и СПР (Союз Педиатров России). Это, что называется, "клинреки здорового человека" против РОП…
Вызываю на дуэль.
РОП опубликовали вторую версию клинических рекомендаций по РАС, где учли некоторые замечания вроде дозировок препаратов, добавили таблицы (вероятно, нейросетевые, но и на том спасибо) но оставили все те же устаревшие лекарства и методы, при этом даже увеличив количество критики поведенческой терапии и других эффективных вмешательств.
Подробно разбирать мелкие изменения я не вижу смысла, к тому же …
🔥669❤263❤🔥126👍48💔11
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @doc_kras. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Искусственный интеллект на приеме анализирует вашу беседу с врачом и самостоятельно заполняет карту - согласились бы?
Я родитель, и я бы согласился38%
Я родитель, и мне все равно3%
Я родитель, и я бы отказался15%
Я специалист, и я бы согласился26%
Я специалист, и мне все равно1%
Я специалист, и я бы отказался7%
Я мимо проходил10%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 April 2026 to 14 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 41 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 October 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ПланетаМед - клиники сложного диагноза @planetamed · 34,923 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 September 2026
Психиатр Онлайн @psychiatristonline · 20,803 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 September 2026
Где моё внимание? @pure_cognitions_adhd · 28,474 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 September 2026
Доктор Сычев @dr_sychev · 49,439 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026
Чистые Когниции @pure_cognitions · 38,902 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026
Заметки детского врача @DrButriy · 137,591 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
Психиатрия & Нейронауки @psy_and_neuro · 22,555 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 September 2026
Доктор Лесков @doctorleskov · 27,764 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 September 2026
Невролог Стецкая Татьяна | ️doctor_steckaya 💊🩺 @doctor_steckaya · 32,606 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
Психотерапевт Прибытков @pribytkov_psy · 40,400 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 30 August 2026
Гастроэнтеролог Саша @gastrosasha95 · 40,761 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Краснощеков | Детская психиатрия” (@doc_kras), 19,309 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doc_kras.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.