Channel
@clinicalpsychoanalysis
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
36,573subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001090822590 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @clinicalpsychoanalysis |
| Description | #психоанализ #клиника #психотерапия #зависимость #психология #психиатрия Обратная связь: [email protected] Проект просветительский. 18+ Рекламы и сбора донатов на канале нет. |
| Created | 20 February 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/clinicalpsychoanalysis |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @clinicalpsychoanalysis/12102 · this entry28 Jul 2026, 10:04 UTC | @russiapsiholog/276831 Jul 2026, 04:42 UTC | 1.00 | 3 days |
| @clinicalpsychoanalysis/12104 · this entry29 Jul 2026, 17:39 UTC | @russiapsiholog/27691 Aug 2026, 06:19 UTC | 1.00 | 3 days |
| @clinicalpsychoanalysis/12105 · this entry30 Jul 2026, 06:34 UTC | @russiapsiholog/27713 Aug 2026, 06:13 UTC | 1.00 | 4 days |
| @clinicalpsychoanalysis/12107 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 07:11 UTC | @russiapsiholog/27746 Aug 2026, 05:58 UTC | 1.00 | 6 days |
| @clinicalpsychoanalysis/12108 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 07:14 UTC | @russiapsiholog/27757 Aug 2026, 05:58 UTC | 1.00 | 7 days |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @russiapsiholog | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 4 days | this entry (5–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 22 comparable posts for this entry, running 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @clinicalpsychoanalysis — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 36,573 | -16 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 14:01 | 36,589 | -1 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 36,590 | +14 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:58 | 36,576 | +18 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:58 | 36,558 | -3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 13:56 | 36,561 | +7 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 21:41 | 36,554 | -12 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 11:20 | 36,566 | -5 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:22 | 36,571 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:17 | 36,574 | +4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:58 | 36,570 | -11 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:43 | 36,581 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 36,580 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:36 | 36,584 | +10 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:38 | 36,574 | +5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:53 | 36,569 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:53 | 36,571 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:43 | 36,570 | -8 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 36,578 | +8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:07 | 36,570 | first reading |
136 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 89 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 136 (28 July 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 178,930 |
| Reactions total | 2,960 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 03:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6,602 reactions across 133 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 6,602 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 136 of the 136 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,726 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 136 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В натуральном виде счастье всегда выглядит убого рядом с цветистыми прикрасами несчастья. И разумеется, стабильность куда менее колоритна, чем нестабильность. А удовлетворенность совершенно лишена романтики сражений со злым роком, нет здесь красочной борьбы с соблазном, нет ореола гибельных сомнений и страстей. Счастье лишено грандиозных эффектов. Олдос Хаксли. «О дивный новый мир». #недомогание_от_культуры #счасть…
👍50
Посмотрите пожалуйста, новый текст https://dzen.ru/a/arYpIoDKlRNCh8ER
👍18
Вот дальнейшее развитие темы про «расползание концептов» Расползание концептов предполагает, что границы того или иного понятия (включая, что является «травмой», а что нет), подвергаются значительным семантическим сдвигам. Они например, расширяются по горизонтали, чтобы включить новые явления, которые раньше находились за пределами границ. Расползание концептов происходит и по вертикали, дабы включать все более нез…
👍25
Синдром отмены характеризуется рядом неприятных состояний, которые возникают, когда человек, у которого была сформирована физическая / физиологическая зависимость от лекарственного препарата, резко прекращает или уменьшает его прием. Ученые изучили информацию взятую из базы данных FAERS USA с первого квартала 2004 года по третий квартал 2023 года. Всего за этот период времени было получено 94 370 сообщений о «синдро…
👍24
Рассказываю про «моду» на психические расстройства и феномен подражания с точки зрения Рене Жирара (René Girard. Eating Disorders and Mimetic Desire). Смотрите где удобнее: Ютуб https://youtu.be/qCK3pbDDbII?is=A-bNcw9xCu1rGtIA Дзен https://dzen.ru/video/watch/6aaa31981d30087399805f56 ТикТок https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSbRA28ry/ #жирар #рпп #видео
👍12
Возникновение психических расстройств в отдаленном периоде медитативных практик относится к числу казуистических, так же как и постгипнотические психопатологические состояния... Психическое состояние мальчика [15 лет отроду] изменилось за год до обращения к психиатрам и госпитализации. В то время он жил у отца, рассказывал матери о его странном поведении, периодически бывал напуган отношением к нему. Совместное вре…
👍34
Томас Шефф о стыде В книге «Bloody Revenge: Emotions, Nationalism, and War» и ряде других публикаций социолог Томас Шефф развивает оригинальную теорию стыда. Ее истоком являются исследования психоаналитического и психотерапевтического процесса, в том числе, парной терапии (работы Льюис, совместные работы Шеффа и Рецингер, и др.). Система «Стыд – Гордость» как социальный барометр. Шефф разделил эти две эмоции по их …
👍67
Букмекерским конторам и легальным казино грозит штраф до полмиллиона рублей если они допустят к азартным играм человека с официально действующим самозапретом, который он самостоятельно оформил (минимальный срок подобного запрета составляет один год, а период охлаждения 12 часов, после размещения соответствующей заявки на сайте Госуслуг или после посещения МФЦ). Итак, несмотря на то, что прошло всего три недели с тог…
👍18
Рассказываю про статью французского культуролога Рене Жирара «Расстройства пищевого поведения и миметическое желание» (René Girard. Eating Disorders and Mimetic Desire). #жирар #рпп #видео
👍20
«Ведь, как всем известно, если хочешь быть счастлив и добродетелен, не обобщай, а держись узких частностей; общие идеи являются неизбежным интеллектуальным злом». Олдос Хаксли. «О дивный новый мир». #недомогание_от_культуры P.S. на всякий случай полезно напомнить, что у Хаксли в романе написанном в 1932 году, Главноуправителя Западной Европы звали Мустафа Монд.
👍41
...Женщина, влюбленная в человека, не отвечающего ей взаимностью, уверенная, что никогда не сможет быть вместе с мужчиной, который ей нравится, приписывающая все свои неудачи одной лишь себе и собственной бестолковости, тем не менее может поддержать эмоциональное равновесие, рассуждая примерно следующим образом: (а) «Ужасно плохо, да. Любовь - это не для меня. Ну что ж, я посвящу себя работе и постараюсь поддерживат…
👍106
Прочитал на днях новый фантастический роман Джеймса С. А. Кори [Дэниела Абрахама и Тая Френка] «Милость богов». На мой взгляд этот роман развивает одну из главных идей Станислава Лема – о трудности установления контакта с инопланетным Другим, что очевидно на примере «Соляриса», «Эдема», «Фиаско» и других его книг. Инопланетный разум у Лема всегда представляет загадку и практически непроницаем. А попытка очеловечива…
👍62
Showing the 12 most recent of 136 posts we hold for @clinicalpsychoanalysis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Клинический психоанализ” (@clinicalpsychoanalysis), 36,573 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/clinicalpsychoanalysis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.