Канал доктора Бурлакова (диетолог, ex pediatr, научный журналист, автор книги «в гармонии с едой», сo-founder BodyCoach).
Nº 7419162339
VK- https://vk.com/dr_burlakov
Ютуб канал- https://youtube.com/@dr.burlakov
Created
7 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 97 days, net -412. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,130–34,704 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 16:07
34,226
+30
9 Nov 2026, 20:50
34,196
-5
8 Nov 2026, 10:16
34,201
-2
7 Nov 2026, 07:47
34,203
-2
6 Nov 2026, 06:47
34,205
-6
5 Nov 2026, 08:49
34,211
-5
4 Nov 2026, 09:17
34,216
-13
3 Nov 2026, 08:35
34,229
-6
2 Nov 2026, 11:36
34,235
-16
1 Nov 2026, 10:54
34,251
+3
31 Oct 2026, 11:54
34,248
-6
30 Oct 2026, 14:05
34,254
-5
29 Oct 2026, 13:58
34,259
+6
28 Oct 2026, 10:16
34,253
-7
27 Oct 2026, 06:56
34,260
-8
26 Oct 2026, 08:47
34,268
-6
25 Oct 2026, 09:55
34,274
-7
24 Oct 2026, 09:10
34,281
-6
23 Oct 2026, 06:09
34,287
-10
22 Oct 2026, 06:36
34,297
first reading
Engagement
134 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 177 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.37%
avg views ÷ 34,226 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,210
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 134 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
134 (1 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
128,240
Reactions total
5,081
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 18:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,830
Videos
≈960
Links
≈1,760
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 40m
Average length
2m 03s
Measured directly from 78 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
19,065 reactions across 132 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
5,584
29.3%
❤
4,809
25.2%
😁
3,340
17.5%
🔥
2,975
15.6%
🤣
1,007
5.28%
🙈
276
1.45%
🤡
259
1.36%
🤯
214
1.12%
👏
148
0.776%
🤬
105
0.551%
😭
48
0.252%
🥴
41
0.215%
🤪
29
0.152%
❤🔥
26
0.136%
😱
26
0.136%
👀
24
0.126%
🤔
23
0.121%
🥰
23
0.121%
💯
20
0.105%
💅
17
0.089%
18 further kinds
71
0.372%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 134 of the 134 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19,347 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 134 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 40 posts held from the last 30 days (15.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Инсулиновая катастрофа от Зубаревой
«Какие анализы покажут нам с вами инсулинорезистентность?»
Никакие. Чувствительность тканей к инсулину напрямую измеряет только золотой стандарт, гиперинсулинемический эугликемический клэмп-тест. Человеку вводят в вену инсулин в постоянной дозе и одновременно глюкозу, подстраивая её так, чтобы глюкоза крови оставалась нормальной. Чем больше глюкозы нужно влить, тем лучше ткани чув…
Паразиты всего от провизора
«90% всех хронических заболеваний в мире вызваны банальным паразитарным обострением, инвазиями. И официальной фарм-системе тотально невыгодно, чтобы мы об этом знали.»
ВОЗ выделяет 4 главные группы неинфекционных болезней, среди них рак и диабет, а среди важных факторов риска курение, алкоголь, нездоровое питание и малоподвижность. Даже в раке на все инфекции приходится 12%, в основном эт…
Метаболизм на 2 метра, как повод попить витамины на всякий случай.
«Все процессы, которые вы видите на карте, в своей основе лежат на витаминах и минералах. Только благодаря им возможны все эти биохимические процессы».
Витамины нужны, тут спора нет. Но то, что их надо докупать в банках, карта обмена веществ не доказывает.
«Миоинозитол… витамин К, витамин Е, витамин D… витамин B12».
Миоинозитол вообще не витамин, кл…
Иммунитет из далёкого космоса.
«иммунитета как системы защиты от вирусов не существует.»
Удивительно точно тогда меряют несуществующее. Антитела и Т-клетки после болезни или прививки измеряют в лаборатории, а по уровню антител предсказывают защиту от многих инфекций.
«любой вирус или патоген, это просто какой-то фрагмент кода. В поле вашей цельности он теряет допуск к вам и мгновенно распадается.»
Что бывает при тя…
«Врачи лечат только симптомы». Правда или миф?
В новом видео разбираю:
- как лечение против хеликобактера при подтверждённой инфекции снижает возврат язвы двенадцатиперстной кишки в 5 раз, примерно с 64 до 13 случаев из 100;
- почему высокое давление считают причиной инсульта и что даёт каждое его снижение на 10 миллиметров ртутного столба;
- как британские поликлиники за год вывели в ремиссию почти половину людей с…
Разбираем ноопепт, который в 1000 раз сильнее пирацетама
«Советский пероральный пептид, который эффективнее пирацетама в тысячу раз»
Тысяча тут про миллиграммы. У животных похожий эффект ноопепт давал в дозе в 1000 раз меньшей, чем пирацетам, а к самому пирацетаму вопросов хватает.
«который влияет на AMPA и NMDA-рецепторы, таким образом обеспечивая долгосрочную потенциацию и консолидацию памяти»
Это показали на кле…
Разбираем геморрой у всех штангистов
Получается, что все штангисты с геморроем. Да, именно. То есть почти все тяжелые атлеты
Почти все кто-то посчитал? В онлайн-опросе 312 спортсменов о геморрое сообщили 48% занимавшихся бодибилдингом. Но диагноз исследователи не проверяли, а анкету распространяли через общество колопроктологов. Выдавать этот результат за статистику по всем тяжелоатлетам нельзя.
Во-первых, у них п…
Заземление и кровь под микроскопом
«Взять кровь, посмотреть кровь под микроскопом, потом ты встал на землю голыми ногами, и потом снова посмотри кровь под микроскопом»
Идея такая: эритроциты, красные клетки крови, должны меньше слипаться и располагаться по отдельности. Это предлагают считать «разжижением крови». Только две картинки ещё не доказывают эффект заземления. Нужно сравнение с такой же процедурой без подкл…
📌Ежемесячная подборка моих соцсетей и полезных материалов в одном месте 👨💻
Новые видео на YouTube / ВК:
📎Слепота, камни, тошнота. Какие побочки уколов для похудения реальны
🔥Смотреть на YouTube
😄Смотреть в ВК
📎Как правильно сдавать анализ крови: сколько не есть и что искажает результат
🔥Смотреть на YouTube
😄Смотреть в ВК
📎Увлажнитель воздуха: польза или вред?
🔥Смотреть на YouTube
😄Смотреть в ВК
📎Что работает пр…
👍41🔥23❤19🤓2
Showing the 12 most recent of 134 posts we hold for @doc_burlakov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Страшная химия @chemistrybyolga · 33,687 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 4 September 2026
Пей таблетки! | MedIQLab @mediq · 65,591 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 August 2026
Занимательная эндокринология @funwithmedicine · 22,756 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 September 2026
СЪЕДОБНЫЙ НАУЧПОП @e_semika · 45,540 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
Гастроэнтеролог ХАРИТОНОВ Андрей Геннадьевич @ag_kharitonov · 58,836 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 22 August 2026
Доктор Комиссарова ☀️ @doctor_komissarova · 96,409 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 August 2026
Юлия Сидорова |Детский эндокринолог| @sidorovasay · 26,566 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 September 2026
Павел Баранов. Эндокринология/диетология. @pavelbaranov_md · 31,082 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 6 September 2026
ДОКТОР ХАН @doctorkhanstanislav · 57,312 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 23 August 2026
coroner's word 💀 @sudmed_words · 21,262 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 September 2026
Doctor_marusenyka @sovetdaymotiv · 23,797 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
Доктор Утин @doctorutin · 24,617 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 September 2026
Гастроэнтеролог Лопатина М.В. @gastrogram · 36,872 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 1 September 2026
dnevnikdoctora @dnevnikdoctora · 45,184 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
ImmunoBee @immunobee1 · 103,899 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
Здравхаб Игоря Воронцова @HealthCoachIgor · 19,764 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 September 2026
MarysStories @Marys_stories · 31,247 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 5 September 2026
Гастроэнтеролог Саша @gastrosasha95 · 40,761 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 30 August 2026
Гастроэнтеролог & Терапевт @doctor_sitkina · 42,032 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
АЛЕКСАНДРА ФРАНЦ про ХИМИЮ @chemistry_frants · 45,006 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
Docma.ru - ДОКАЗАТЕЛЬНАЯ МЕДИЦИНА @Docma_ru · 41,698 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 29 August 2026
Нефролог I Данила Пыриков @pyrikov · 67,021 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
Газовый гигант (ibs.doc)🪐 @ibs_doc · 21,742 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 23 September 2026
Заготовки с Шелушей @zagotovki_welldone · 31,080 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 62 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Бородатый не пробовал | доктор Бурлаков” (@doc_burlakov), 34,226 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doc_burlakov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.