Психпросвет, научный подход в психологии, упражнения и техники, самоподдержка. Тут все, что вы хотели знать об эмоциональной регуляции, но боялись спросить. Веду я — Галя Петракова @galinapetrakova
РКН: https://clck.ru/3Nzv6P
Created
2 July 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 96 days, net +754. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,398–18,492 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 20:47
18,328
-3
9 Nov 2026, 06:09
18,331
-3
7 Nov 2026, 23:49
18,334
-8
5 Nov 2026, 17:46
18,342
-5
4 Nov 2026, 20:40
18,347
-3
1 Nov 2026, 21:26
18,350
-2
31 Oct 2026, 20:54
18,352
-3
30 Oct 2026, 20:27
18,355
-1
29 Oct 2026, 19:27
18,356
-7
28 Oct 2026, 22:05
18,363
-3
27 Oct 2026, 18:27
18,366
+11
26 Oct 2026, 18:06
18,355
-1
25 Oct 2026, 21:16
18,356
-1
25 Oct 2026, 00:27
18,357
+4
23 Oct 2026, 22:09
18,353
+3
22 Oct 2026, 23:18
18,350
+2
21 Oct 2026, 23:46
18,348
-3
20 Oct 2026, 22:01
18,351
-2
19 Oct 2026, 23:20
18,353
+2
19 Oct 2026, 02:21
18,351
first reading
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 7 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 26 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
452
Videos
81
Links
264
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
2m 43s
Average length
1m 22s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,597 reactions across 26 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,767
60.2%
😁
674
14.7%
🔥
601
13.1%
👍
371
8.07%
✍
96
2.09%
💅
36
0.783%
🤝
23
0.5%
🤩
13
0.283%
😢
8
0.174%
🙈
7
0.152%
🤯
1
0.022%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,597 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 7 January 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
110
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 26 we hold a reading for · 31%
Most on one post
101
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @volna_cc. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 January 2026 to 28 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
11.5%
3 of 26 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
7,950
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
7,260
over 23 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VSb5w8tPbF
1
26 March 2026
26 March 2026
2VSb5yU1tAW
1
10 June 2026
10 June 2026
2VSb5z1N8r5
1
13 January 2026
13 January 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 7 January 2026 to 28 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Рекомендации и статистика.
В 2025 году American Psychological Association, одна из крупнейших и наиболее влиятельных профессиональных психологических организаций в мире, выпустила Ethical Guidance for AI in the Professional Practice of Health Service Psychology — рекомендации по использованию ИИ в профессиональной психологической практике. Все желающие могут изучить их подробно, но ключевая идея в том, что AI должен…
Ну давайте, давайте уже поговорим об ЭТОМ. Об ИИ и психотерапии, конечно же.
Мы с вами люди рациональные, поэтому ниже — все, что у нас есть к этому часу по животрепещущей теме.
В 2025 году в NEJM AI вышло первое рандомизированное контролируемое исследование Therabot — специально разработанного генеративного ИИ-чатбота для психического здоровья. Результаты показали значимое снижение симптомов депрессии, генерализов…
✨Необычные✨ категории в МКБ-11
Полистаем Международную классификацию болезней (почему бы и нет?) и посмотрим, для каких неожиданных проявлений человеческой жизни там нашлось местечко.
QE50.0 — проблемы в отношениях с другом.
Конфликты и другие сложности в дружеских отношениях, достаточно значимые, чтобы влиять на состояние человека или становиться поводом для обращения за помощью. Просто и по-человечески.
QE50.1 —…
Должен ли терапевт дарить вам кольцо без повода лучшее окно в своем расписании, а также смеяться над каждой вашей шуткой (вместо того чтобы обеспокоенно записывать что-то в блокнот)? Сегодня обсуждаем базовый минимум и роскошный максимум в психотерапии, друзья!
Ниже мой список, ваши дополнения принимаются в комментариях.
Базовый минимум:
— Метод, в котором работает терапевт, находится хотя бы в пределах современно…
И если, друзья, вам что-то подсказывает, что, как и участникам вышеперечисленных исследований, навыки совпадения с текущим стрессом, тревогой и мыслительной жвачкой могли бы вам пригодиться — обратите внимание на анонс ниже и запрыгивайте в последний вагон программы снижения стресса на основе осознанности для новичков. Как обычно большая часть потока набрана из листа ожидания, осталось 6 мест.
Запись, основная инфо…
Настала осень, и администрация, а также креативная часть канала — в полном составе меня — наконец возвращаются в строй.
В честь этого предлагаю вспомнить, что изначально мы тут все собрались, чтобы обсуждать осознанность, mindfulness как научно обоснованный навык и терапевтическое направление.
Давайте посмотрим, что крупного наисследовали за последние годы в этой области: свежие рандомизированные исследования (всё …
Сегодня поговорим о том, как заводить друзей во взрослом возрасте. Никакой магии: вам потребуется всего лишь простой советский 200 часов совместно проведенного качественного времени!
Одно из самых известных эмпирических исследований формирования дружбы показывает, что:
— около 50 часов совместного времени требуется, чтобы перейти от простого знакомства к приятельским отношениям;
— около 90 часов — чтобы начать счит…
В Испании приближается август. В августе не работают банки, сервисы и примерно весь малый бизнес. Потому что жарко, знаете ли. Работать в такой обстановке просто невозможно.
Когда я только переехала, почему-то думала, что моя прекрасная тренерша по пилатесу Карла будет исключением. Она как будто и не предупреждала меня ни о чём заранее. Но когда в очередной раз перед выходными я сказала: «Пока, Карла, увидимся в пон…
Давайте даже докрутим и представим совсем «страшную ситуацию» — вы обращаетесь к специалисту в госсистеме, про которого ну совсем ничего не знаете, — ну что ж. Можно применить старый дедовский способ получения информации из эпохи, когда не у каждого специалиста были профессиональные соцсети, и... спросить.
«У меня есть вопросы, связанные с сексуальной ориентацией (или гендерной идентичностью — если не боитесь напуга…
Много человек несколько недель назад присылали мне это чудесное видео и связанные с ним статьи. Давайте попробуем спокойно разобраться.
Во-первых, если говорить о гомосексуальности, то здесь ситуация довольно однозначная. Международный профессиональный консенсус не менялся десятилетиями. Американская психиатрическая ассоциация исключила гомосексуальность из списка психических расстройств еще в 1973 году, ВОЗ — в 199…
Друзья, привет!
С огромным удовольствием сообщаю, что прошлый “продвинутый” поток МБСР оказался невероятно удачным. Причем сразу на нескольких уровнях. С одной стороны, нам удалось остаться внутри структуры и гайдов программы, а с другой — появилось пространство для гораздо более глубокого освоения практики и обсуждения тех тем, на которые в обычном “базовом” формате почти никогда не хватает времени и ресурса группы…
Знаете эти смешные видео “how to speak corporate” — вроде того, как сообщить коллеге, что его идея абсолютно идиотская, на вежливом корпоративном языке?
Так вот, мы недавно спонтанно пытались сделать такое же видео про “терапевтический” язык, и это было чрезвычайно весело. Фразы муж придумывал на ходу и совершенно не стеснялся в выражениях. Видео у нас, конечно же, не записалось (и мы решили, что перезаписывать его …
😁250❤102🔥55👍24
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @volna_cc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @volna_cc as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
3 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 months
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Федиатрия @fediatrix · 53,893 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 August 2026
Доктор Галеева @doctor_galeeva · 28,842 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
Чтобы не выгорать @notburningout · 43,552 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
Намочи манту @namochimanturu · 56,208 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
Людмила Петрановская @lpetranovskaya · 166,610 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
Alter @psyalter_ru · 26,498 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 September 2026
Так и ходи @freethecurls · 45,861 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
еврейка у микрофона @urfavjewishgirl · 44,388 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
The Content is The Queen @thecontentisthequeen · 21,451 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 September 2026
Доктор Сычев @dr_sychev · 49,439 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026
Чистые Когниции @pure_cognitions · 38,902 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Море волнуется, а ты — нет” (@volna_cc), 18,328 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/volna_cc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.