Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

말하는 토끼

@malto0115

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,756subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001532588150
TypeChannel
Username@malto0115
Description같이 소통하며 꾸준히 수익 내기! ✔️ 텔레그램 : https://t.me/malto0115 ✔️ 대화방 : https://t.me/+zEQHDO7baCw5MmQ1 ✔️ 블로그 : https://blog.naver.com/malto04 ✔️협업문의 : @malto04
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/malto0115

Growth

5,7565,7625,7598 August 2026 — 5,762 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,759 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,756 subscribers8 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,755–5,763 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 01:435,756-3
9 Aug 2026, 12:025,759-3
8 Aug 2026, 15:475,762first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.87%
avg views ÷ 5,756 subscribers
Avg views / post
280
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 28 of 29 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held29 (5 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total8,124
Reactions total92
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,280
Videos
49
Links
2,900

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

92 reactions across 28 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5155.4%
4144.6%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 02:21 UTC58 viewsread 12 August 2026

업비트 요즘 상장 엄청 많이 하네요. 과세 전 마지막 피날레인가?

12 Aug 2026, 02:21 UTC26 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @shrimp_notice

업비트(Upbit) 공지 [거래] 프롬(PROM) KRW, USDT 마켓 디지털 자산 추가 2026-08-12 11:11:41

👍1

11 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC121 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @mujammin123Photo

멀티플리 세일은 sonar 연결하니 적격 유무 뜨네요 sonar는 작년에 플라즈마, 메가이더, 젠신, 파로스 등 굵직한 녀석들 세일했었음. 소나 kyc 해뒀으면 금방함 8월 14일까지 3일 남았는데 적격 뜨는지 체크해보시고 연결~ https://claim.multiplifoundation.com/

3

11 Aug 2026, 01:52 UTC85 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @shrimp_notice

빗썸(Bithumb) 공지 [마켓 추가] 댑오에스(DOS) 원화 마켓 추가 2026-08-11 10:17:41

3

10 Aug 2026, 06:31 UTC273 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📱 [우리은행] 우리의 소원 적금, 연 최대 8.29%(세전) ⭐️ 쌀먹 요약 - 우리은행 적금 상품 최대 연 8.29% - 최대 50만원, 최대 1년 가입 가능 - 기본 3%~4.29%, 소원 남기기 참여 2%+, 6개월 우리은행 상품 미보유 시 2%+, 총 최대 8.29% ✅ 참여 방법 1️⃣우리은행WON뱅킹 실행 2️⃣오른쪽 하단 혜택 이동 3️⃣진행 중인 이벤트 - 우리의 소원 예적금 진입 4️⃣우리의 소원 적금 가입하러 가기 5️⃣상품 가입 - 예상 금리에서 우리 금리 항목 체크 후 받기 6️⃣50만원 1년 가입 시 총 이자 : 227,356원 💬 코멘트 원금 손실 없는 은행 적금 상품입니다. 주식과 코인에 지치신 분들에게 피난처가 될듯합니다.

👍2

10 Aug 2026, 03:46 UTC283 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @hedgehara

걍 선물하셈 https://www.fnnews.com/news/202608100956278427

👍2

10 Aug 2026, 01:18 UTC188 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @coinboysPhoto

🇰🇷 가상자산 과세, 2030년까지 3년 유예 법안 발의 Source 국민의힘 정성국 의원이 가상자산 과세 시행일을 기존 2027년 1월 1일에서 2030년 1월 1일로 미루는 소득세법 개정안을 발의한다고 함. • 현행 과세 시작: 2027년 1월 1일 • 유예안: 2030년 1월 1일로 3년 연기 • 현재 기준 연 250만 원 초과 수익에 22% 과세 예정 • 과세 대상은 비트코인·이더리움 등 가상자산 양도·대여 소득 • 국민의힘은 별도로 가상자산 과세 자체를 폐지하는 법안도 추진 중 정 의원은 투자자 보호와 공정한 과세 기반이 충분히 마련된 뒤 시행해야 한다는 입장. 다만 아직 ‘발의’ 단계라 실제 유예 확정 여부는 국회 논의를 더 지켜봐야 함!

8

7 Aug 2026, 07:51 UTC346 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @coinnesskr

['가상자산 트래블룰 금액기준 폐지' 특금법, 국무회의 거쳐 20일 시행] 가상자산 트래블룰 금액기준을 폐지하는 내용의 특정금융정보법 개정안이 11일 국무회의에 오른다고 디지털애셋이 전했다. 국무회의 의결을 거치면 오는 20일부터 시행된다. 개정안은 가상자산사업자가 100만원 이상 디지털자산을 이전하는 경우에만 관련 정보를 제공하던 것에서 금액과 상관없이 이전할 때마다 정보를 제공하게 하도록 정했다. https://coinness.com/news/1164985 원문보기 : https://www.digitalasset.works/news/articleView.html?idxno=42351

1👍1

7 Aug 2026, 07:06 UTC316 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📱 생산적 ISA 개편안 부정적 이슈 살펴 보기 저도 ISA 계좌를 만들어서 주식 모으기를 하고 있습니다. 그런데 얼마 전에 ISA 개편 관련 내용이 나와서 AI에 한번 물어 봤습니다. ① 해외 ETF 투자 완전 차단 기존 ISA에서 투자할 수 있었던 국내 상장 해외 ETF, 해외 자산 펀드, 예적금 등은 대상에서 제외돼 사실상 국내 투자 전용 계좌가 됐습니다. TIGER 미국나스닥100레버리지 → 생산적 ISA에 담기 불가 KODEX 미국S&P500 → 생산적 ISA에 담기 불가 → 현재 본인 ISA 전략 자체가 새 ISA에서는 사용 불가 ② 기존 ISA 만기 5년으로 제한 기존 ISA는 최소 3년만 유지하면 사실상 기간 제한 없이 연장이 가능했습니다. 투자자들은 장기간 계좌를 유지하며 과세를 뒤로 미루는 효과와 복리 효과를 동시에 누릴

2👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @malto0115. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,159,484 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“말하는 토끼” (@malto0115), 5,756 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/malto0115.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.