Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 99 days, net -4,362. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,684–41,365 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 16:56
36,347
+7
10 Nov 2026, 16:10
36,340
+1
9 Nov 2026, 00:39
36,339
-5
7 Nov 2026, 17:07
36,344
-13
6 Nov 2026, 16:37
36,357
-10
5 Nov 2026, 13:47
36,367
-7
4 Nov 2026, 13:21
36,374
-1
3 Nov 2026, 13:30
36,375
+2
1 Nov 2026, 08:30
36,373
+2
31 Oct 2026, 07:35
36,371
-8
30 Oct 2026, 09:40
36,379
-7
29 Oct 2026, 08:20
36,386
-7
28 Oct 2026, 08:27
36,393
-3
27 Oct 2026, 07:01
36,396
+8
26 Oct 2026, 05:09
36,388
-42
24 Oct 2026, 02:18
36,430
-7
23 Oct 2026, 00:46
36,437
+12
22 Oct 2026, 00:48
36,425
-3
20 Oct 2026, 19:17
36,428
+4
19 Oct 2026, 17:15
36,424
first reading
Engagement
171 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 186 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.6%
avg views ÷ 36,347 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,950
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.87%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 171 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held
171 (30 July 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total
197,850
Reactions total
3,709
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Nov 2026, 04:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,590
Videos
≈62
Links
≈2,880
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
50s
Average length
25s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
15,282 reactions across 167 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
7,839
51.3%
🔥
2,809
18.4%
👍
2,124
13.9%
😁
1,112
7.28%
🙏
944
6.18%
👎
258
1.69%
👏
196
1.28%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 171 of the 171 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15,521 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 171 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
75
across the posts below
Posts paid on
39
of 171 we hold a reading for · 23%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @justakindreminder. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 171 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 13 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
1.17%
2 of 171 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
4,290
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
4,910
over 169 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2RanykrwEQT
1
26 August 2026
26 August 2026
2RanynWxxFM
1
31 August 2026
31 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 171 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 13 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 15 of 40 posts held from the last 30 days (37.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Так сколько же яиц можно есть в неделю: три, семь или бесконечно много?
Удивительно, но этот вопрос до сих пор вызывает горячие споры. У яиц в этом смысле вообще очень драматическая история (подробно описали ее здесь): на протяжении всего ХХ века их объявляли то лучшим источником белка, то «убийцей сердца».
Впервые куриные яйца попали в опалу в 1968 году, когда главный мировой трендсеттер в области здоровья сердца …
Откуда берется усталость?
Немного странно, но ученые только в последние годы начали понимать, как возникает ощущение отсутствия энергии. Само понятие энергии было как бы под запретом в медицине: слишком субъективное, даже эзотерическое. Энергию ведь не измеришь как уровень глюкозы в крови. Не приложишь к вискам электросчетчик.
Но открытия последних 5-7 лет в области работы митохондрий, а также сигнальных систем моз…
«Я по жизни скептик. Но когда кто-то предлагает устройство за £599 (около 65 тысяч рублей), которое обещает именно то, чего мне не хватает, я, конечно, должен немедленно его купить и проверить».
Сооснователь креативного агентства nda. Денис Кожаев месяц стимулировал блуждающий нерв (самый разветвленный нерв в нашем организме, он отвечает за связь мозга с внутренними органами) током с помощью специального гаджета — N…
Как узнать, что у студентов началась сессия? В Университете Квинсленда (Австралия) решили поискать ответ в канализации. Исследователи каждый день брали пробы сточных вод кампуса до и во время экзаменов и сравнивали их с пробами из соседнего района.
Во время сессии в стоках кампуса заметно вырос уровень 8-гидроксигуанина — маркера окислительного стресса (точнее — окислительного повреждения ДНК вследствие стресса).
И…
Британке Бетти Бромидж 97 лет, и этим летом она стояла на верхнем крыле летящего биплана, пристегнутая страховочными ремнями, пока самолет выполнял мертвую петлю.
Десять лет назад, в 87 лет, Бетти переехала в дом престарелых и решила, что ей нужно новое занятие. Однажды она увидела по телевизору, как британский путешественник Бен Фогл помогает людям с инвалидностью подняться в горы, и тоже решила сделать что-то необ…
Завтрак — самый «культурно нагруженный» прием пищи.
Про обед и ужин у нас не так много представлений. Разве что, в обед хорошо бы съесть суп, а к ужину, как мы знаем из фильмов, подают мясо с гарниром (и вино).
Картинки же завтрака стоят перед глазами: яйца и бекон, хлопья, йогурт с ягодами, тост с джемом, каша, апельсиновый сок.
Спасибо нужно сказать производителям продуктов питания и их агрессивной маркетинговой…
Что вы могли пропустить в Reminder за прошедшую неделю
*️⃣ 5 медицинских открытий, в которые когда-то отказывались верить даже врачи. Сегодня мы не представляем больницу без мытья рук, операцию без наркоза и не пьем антибиотики при вирусных инфекциях. Но эти максимы были далеко не всегда очевидны: так,
в XIX веке венский врач Игнац Земмельвейс предложил акушерам мыть руки перед принятием родов и тем самым в нескольк…
Эффект Cinnabon
В торговом центре мимо магазинов идет человек и будто случайно роняет ручку или просит у прохожего разменять купюру. Казалось бы, поможет ему незнакомец или нет — дело характера. Но американский психолог Роберт Бэрон с помощью небольшого эксперимента показал, что во многом реакцию людей определяет то, чем в этот момент пахнет.
Бэрон ставил такие сценки в разных зонах торгового центра: то рядом с пек…
«Танпин» (можно перевести как «лежать плашмя») — возникшая в Китае философия добровольного отказа от карьерной гонки и культа достижений. Молодежь бросает работу или сознательно не выходит на нее: все равно мало платят и нужно трудиться целыми днями.
Для правительства это довольно болезненное явление, так как безработица среди 16-24-летних (за вычетом студентов) уже достигает 18%. В этом году Министерство государств…
Если задуматься, фитнес-клуб — довольно странное изобретение. Люди добровольно отдают деньги за возможность поднимать тяжести, чтобы потом поставить их на место, бегать по дорожке, которая никуда не ведет, и крутить педали неподвижного велосипеда. Если бы нам предложили выполнять такую работу бесплатно, мы бы, скорее всего, отказались.
У этого безумия довольно богатая история: идея специально собираться в одном мест…
Летом 2021 года 66-летний учитель музыки Эдвард Фрейтаг ехал на мотоцикле по горной дороге в Теннесси. На повороте он потерял управление и вылетел на обочину. Друзья нашли его в девяти метрах от мотоцикла. У Эдварда были сломаны 11 костей и серьезно поврежден мозг. В больнице он с трудом подбирал слова, плохо запоминал происходящее и странно себя вел. Впрочем, жизни ничего не угрожало: врачи обещали, что через нескол…
🔥53❤30🙏5
Showing the 12 most recent of 171 posts we hold for @justakindreminder. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@justakindreminder edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
14 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @justakindreminder as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
26 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
26 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
26 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 60 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 36 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Чтобы не выгорать @notburningout · 43,519 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
Мастриды @mustreads · 44,952 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
Купрум @tolkosprosit · 42,773 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
deep mind 2.0 @mindfulleadersrussia · 20,588 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 September 2026
Намочи манту @namochimanturu · 56,199 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
ПостНаука @postnauka · 22,296 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 September 2026
The Future Of Work @thefutureofwork · 21,234 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 26 September 2026
З—Ж @t_zdorov · 19,360 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 2 October 2026
Соколова наизнанку @naiznankuo · 59,557 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
Dumik @dumik · 21,747 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 September 2026
Dasha’s notes | люди и смыслы @technohumanist · 39,133 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 1 September 2026
Йод | Лайфхакер @lh_health · 22,577 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 September 2026
Цифровой этикет @digitaletiquette · 24,301 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 16 September 2026
Matskevich - brains, love and robots @Matskevich · 24,970 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
Теории и Практики @tandp_ru · 21,981 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 21 September 2026
Alter @psyalter_ru · 26,504 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 September 2026
Критическое мышление @ThinkCritical · 46,981 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 August 2026
Т—Ж Мозг @t_dopamine · 20,922 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 September 2026
The Content is The Queen @thecontentisthequeen · 21,437 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 September 2026
Психология @PsyEducation · 58,821 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
Лидерская позиция | Андрей Шапенко @leadership_position · 27,495 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 September 2026
Кинжал @Le_kinzhal · 45,997 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
Рецепты Лайфхакера @lh_eda · 38,361 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 31 August 2026
Ваня Замесин @zamesin · 50,070 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 35 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Daily Reminder” (@justakindreminder), 36,347 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/justakindreminder.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
