Channel
@theblueprintru
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
94,335subscribers
-74 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001327938595 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @theblueprintru |
| Description | Основной канал The Blueprint — независимого издания о моде, красоте и современной культуре Сайт: theblueprint.ru Почта: [email protected] Реклама: [email protected] Показы: [email protected] Запись в РКН: https://theblueprint.ru/l/UB86DFX |
| Created | 2 April 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/theblueprintru |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:06 | 94,335 | -28 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:54 | 94,363 | -61 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:08 | 94,424 | -75 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 94,499 | -37 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:44 | 94,536 | +102 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:51 | 94,434 | +9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:44 | 94,425 | -14 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 94,439 | +20 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:31 | 94,419 | +10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 94,409 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 94,409 | first reading |
84 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 84 (5 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 397,102 |
| Reactions total | 3,489 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 08:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
3,101 reactions across 74 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,145 | 36.9% | |
| custom 5303182852664353024 | 756 | 24.4% | |
| 🔥 | 365 | 11.8% | |
| 👍 | 152 | 4.90% | |
| 😁 | 147 | 4.74% | |
| 😍 | 103 | 3.32% | |
| ⚡ | 88 | 2.84% | |
| 👎 | 58 | 1.87% | |
| 🙏 | 39 | 1.26% | |
| 🍓 | 37 | 1.19% | |
| 🤯 | 36 | 1.16% | |
| 😢 | 34 | 1.10% | |
| 💯 | 26 | 0.838% | |
| 🤔 | 25 | 0.806% | |
| 🕊 | 24 | 0.774% | |
| 💋 | 17 | 0.548% | |
| 👏 | 13 | 0.419% | |
| 🌚 | 11 | 0.355% | |
| 💔 | 11 | 0.355% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 0.226% | |
| 2 further kinds | 7 | 0.226% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 84 of the 84 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,489reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 84 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @theblueprintru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 84 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzquskZgw | 1 | 11 August 2026 | 11 August 2026 |
| 2VtzqvdjzqH | 1 | 13 August 2026 | 13 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 84 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Отпуск можно планировать за полгода, собраться за два дня или вообще не отделять его от работы В первом случае есть риск превратить каникулы в проект с дедлайнами, во втором — провести их в поисках свободного номера, а в третьем — отправиться в путешествие, но так и не расстаться с коллегами. У каждого сценария свои правила и способы испортить отдых. Разобрали их вместе с психотерапевтом, опытными путешественниками…
❤7
«Золотую малину» не выиграть без помощи множества людей, — справедливо замечала актриса Хэлли Берри на вручении «почетной» статуэтки. Впрочем, расстраиваться ей было ни к чему. Всего за несколько лет до этого Хэлли стала первой (и до сих пор — единственной) темнокожей актрисой, взявшей «Оскара» за «Лучшую женскую роль», главной героиней клипа Limp Bizkit Behind Blue Eyes — и кем только не. Сегодня актрисе исполняет…
custom 530318285266435302427❤15🔥7👍5
Video message, posted without a caption
❤16custom 53031828526643530248👍5🔥4
⚡️Юрий Колокольников — новый герой видеорубрики The Blueprint! Что ему подарили после съемок «Игры престолов»? Зачем ему бита у кровати? И как актер снимает напряжение после тяжелого дня? Сувенир из Вестероса, книга мертвых и бита гаишника — что еще мы нашли в спальне Юрия Колокольникова? Смотрите в новом выпуске «Прикроватного столика». Смотрите видео на площадках: 📹YouTube 📺Vk Video 🔹The Blueprint
👍13custom 530318285266435302410🔥9❤5
Очень неленивую работу проделала редакция The Blueprint. Вообще то, что еще вчера казалось кошмаром любого пиарщика, сегодня таковым не кажется совсем. Видя, как много драгоценного внимания бренды приобретают через негатив (а как еще, если мы все прихлопнуты бетонной плитой контента), понимаешь, что выход один: рисковать (ведь контекст может меняться ежедневно), морально быть готовым к тому, что что-то пойдет не по …
❤10custom 53031828526643530245💯3
Жили-были российские музеи — и вдруг в них стало подозрительно много сказок. 15 августа в Великом Новгороде откроется «Сказка рядом» Музея русского импрессионизма — с Репиным, Рерихом и братьями Васнецовыми, а в прошлом году, например, были «Жили-были» на Винзаводе и «Я иду искать!» в Царицыне. Иван Чекалов отправился по сказочному следу и выяснил, почему взрослые снова массово потянулись в тридевятое царство — и чт…
❤25🔥9custom 53031828526643530245
Всегда нужно чувствовать время, в котором ты живешь Съемка Ekonika с британской супермоделью Роузи Хантингтон-Уайтли стала настоящим яблоком раздора: кадры кампейна в Instagram*, в комментариях к которым предъявили разом и бренду — за «неоправданную» трату бюджета, и Хантингтон-Уайтли — за сотрудничество с российской компанией, были удалены через 5 дней после публикации. В попытке выяснить — зачем вообще российским…
custom 530318285266435302424🤯15💯9❤8😡1
Хотите, чтобы подписчики «Карьеры» The Blueprint узнали о новой вакансии в вашей компании или о вашем назначении? Присылайте вакансии и кадровые новости, используя специальные формы на нашем сайте: 📌 Рассказать о вакантном месте в вашей компании https://theblueprint.ru/l/1zlTI4Y 📌 Поделиться новостями о кадровых перестановках https://theblueprint.ru/l/T592zEZ
custom 53031828526643530245❤4👍2
Best dressed по версии редакции 🐶 Делитесь образами своих хвостатых друзей в комментариях! 🔹The Blueprint
❤69😍28🍓15👏1
Лучшие друзья дизайнеров Четвероногим сегодня остается только позавидовать. Они не платят за одежду и аксессуары, а нарядить их стремятся уже не только сами хозяева, но и бренды. Dolce & Gabbana, Marc Jacobs и adidas — лишь часть компаний, которые уже придумали, что предложить вашим питомцам. Добавляем в вишлист! 🔹The Blueprint | Рассылка
😍20🍓8custom 53031828526643530246🥰3💅2
Первая ракетка мира Арина Соболенко — на обложке Time. Стилизовала спортсменку Микаэла Эрлангер в образы Gucci, Nike, Audemars Piguet, Material Good. В интервью изданию белорусская теннисистка рассказала, как переживала из-за проигрыша Наоми Осаке (и где восстанавливалась потом), а также поделилась воспоминаниями о детстве в Минске и гибели отца. Фотограф: Молли Кранна. 🔹The Blueprint News | Рассылка
❤62custom 530318285266435302424👍9🔥5👏4👎3🕊1🤔1
Для макияжа Guerlain Эшодмезон был примерно тем же, кем Карл Лагерфельд стал для Chanel Вчера в возрасте 84 лет умер Оливье Эшодмезон — французский визажист, который с нуля запустил первую линию макияжа Givenchy и преобразил легендарное наследие дома Guerlain. С его именем связывают едва ли не все главные символы макияжа Guerlain — пудру в разноцветных шариках Météorites, бронзирующую пудру Terracotta, помады KissKi…
🕊23💔11🙏7😢3custom 53031828526643530242❤1💋1
Showing the 12 most recent of 84 posts we hold for @theblueprintru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 121 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 35 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Blueprint” (@theblueprintru), 94,335 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/theblueprintru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.