Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ppprompt | Sexy AI Prompts & Experiments | by @ponchiknews

Channel

Ppprompt | Sexy AI Prompts & Experiments | by @ponchiknews

@ppprompt

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,553subscribers

+752 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001920328611
TypeChannel
Username@ppprompt
DescriptionАвторский канал про AI и технологии от Алексея Иванова @ponchiknews. Про рекламу можно спросить Женю: @RealPonchikTeam
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ppprompt

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,80115,56115,18115,5535 August 20269 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 96 days, net +752. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,687–15,675 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 18:4115,553-4
8 Nov 2026, 07:4715,557+4
7 Nov 2026, 04:2115,553+8
6 Nov 2026, 02:0915,545-5
4 Nov 2026, 22:4515,550+2
3 Nov 2026, 19:1015,548+1
2 Nov 2026, 15:3015,547-4
1 Nov 2026, 13:1815,551+2
31 Oct 2026, 11:4615,549+18
30 Oct 2026, 09:1815,531-10
29 Oct 2026, 08:1415,541+9
28 Oct 2026, 06:4515,532+1
27 Oct 2026, 04:0715,531-9
26 Oct 2026, 01:1615,540-8
25 Oct 2026, 00:3115,548-8
24 Oct 2026, 00:0015,556-1
23 Oct 2026, 00:0015,557-4
21 Oct 2026, 21:3115,561+4
20 Oct 2026, 13:3115,557+5
19 Oct 2026, 09:5715,552first reading

Engagement

77 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.8%
avg views ÷ 15,553 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,860
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.612%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 77 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held77 (22 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total92,640
Reactions total567
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 06:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,740
Videos
≈861
Links
≈1,340

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
45m 07s
Average length
1m 40s

Measured directly from 27 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,615 reactions across 72 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁42126.1%
❤39024.1%
🔥32920.4%
👍19612.1%
🤯815.02%
🙈734.52%
💯442.72%
😨150.929%
🤔140.867%
🤷‍♀140.867%
🤓120.743%
🦄70.433%
👏60.372%
🫡60.372%
☃30.186%
⚡20.124%
👾10.062%
🙏10.062%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 75 of the 77 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,708 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 77 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 77 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ppprompt. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 77 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 24 posts held from the last 30 days (8.33%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 17:34 UTC≈1,580 views38 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

В Норвегии нашли интересный способ с помощью AI и лазера избавлять фермерского лосося от паразитов. Больше 2000 подводных роботов компании Stingray выслеживают на рыбе мелких рачков и отстреливают их по одному. Для рыбы эти паразиты смертельно опасны, а привычная чистка теплой водой или струями настолько травмирует лосося, что стала главной причиной гибели взрослой рыбы на фермах. Поэтому норвежцы отправили в садки…

🔥30❤3👍3⚡1🤯1

10 Nov 2026, 13:10 UTC≈1,660 views6 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Anthropic выпустила Claude Fable 5.2 и Mythos 5.2 По сути, это одна модель в двух версиях: Fable доступна всем, а Mythos организациям с подтверждённым доступом для исследований в кибербезопасности и биомедицине. Fable 5.2 генерирует до 30% быстрее прошлой версии и стоит дешевле: $8 за миллион токенов на вход и $40 на выход. В бенчмарке по коду FrontierCode 2.0 результат вырос с 32,4% до 49,1% (у Opus 5.5 - 45,5%). …

👍6

6 Nov 2026, 12:54 UTC≈3,440 views10 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Google выпустили Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash Увеличили длительность генерации видео до 15 секунд вместо 10, с шагом в одну секунду. Появилось многоходовое редактирование прямо внутри диалога - можно попросить модель доработать уже сгенерированный клип, не начиная заново. Улучшилось следование референсам: персонажам, продуктам, стилю, а изображение стало меньше "плыть" между кадрами. Речь звучит естественнее - лучше липсин…

👍9❤1

5 Nov 2026, 11:08 UTC≈3,690 views15 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Вышло обновление ChatGPT Images 2.6 Что нового: • Теперь можно генерировать гифки из промпта или готовой картинки, менять скорость и редактировать отдельные кадры. • Появились Reference Images: можно сохранить фото себя, питомца или персонажа и потом использовать его в новых генерациях без повторной загрузки. • Для разработчиков анонсировали две модели: Flare генерирует изображения всего за 6 секунд, а Sunburst д…

❤13👍2

4 Nov 2026, 17:12 UTC≈3,790 views35 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Каждой новой модели Claude чувак давал один и тот же промпт. С июля 2025 вышло 13 моделей. В видео выше эволюция результатов за одну минуту. Моя первая мысль: несемся в будущее с невероятной скоростью, конеш! PS: промпт вот Make me a 3D website that's a kind of video game, with an infinite procedural terrain and a camera that keeps moving forward through it forever. The terrain should be full of stuff and objects, …

👍20❤8🤔7

4 Nov 2026, 14:05 UTC≈3,580 views17 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Роботы Xiaomi вышли на первую 8-часовую смену на автозаводе. Сортируют детали электромобилей примерно по одной в минуту. PS: Робот Cyberone 2 называется @ppprompt

❤11👏4🔥2

3 Nov 2026, 15:04 UTC≈3,660 views15 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

OpenAI показали LifeVal - бенчмарк для личных AI-агентов/ассистентов. Суть - берется N жизненных задач и оценивается умение модели их разруливать: подобрать детсад после переезда, собрать меню для родственника с диабетом, найти дом. Задачи получились после опроса 4 тыс человек, которые пользуются агентами как личными ассистентами. По бенчу выходит, что 10 из 16 задач GPT 6 Astra делает на 100%, остальные - на 88-98%…

❤11🫡3🦄1

3 Nov 2026, 13:07 UTC≈3,420 views29 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Андрей Карпаты поделился сайд-проектом, который сделал на выходных: фронтенд для YouTube, который подбирает видео не по алгоритму, а по тому, что реально рекомендуют друг другу на Hacker News Он попросил Claude (Opus 5.5) проанализировать 43 миллиона комментариев с Hacker News за 20 лет и выделить видео, которые там регулярно советуют друг другу. Получилось 6454 ролика - на их основе собран сайт: hackertube.org Под…

🔥21👍5🙈2❤1

29 Oct 2026, 17:39 UTC≈4,280 views32 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Кажется найден самый актуальный костюм на Хэллоуин 🎃 @ppprompt

😁23👍4🙈3❤2

29 Oct 2026, 14:22 UTC≈4,190 views18 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Nvidia выпустила Nemotron-3.5-Transcribe-30B-A4B - открытую модель для распознавания и понимания речи на 40 языках, включая русский Модель принимает аудио вместе с текстовой инструкцией и может делать транскрипцию, перевод, разметку по спикерам и отвечать на вопросы по содержанию записи. Обрабатывает записи длительностью до часа. По качеству распознавания на английском и в среднем по языкам ошибка держится на уровн…

👍10🔥6❤1🦄1

28 Oct 2026, 13:22 UTC≈3,790 views9 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Google DeepMind представили Genie 4 - новую версию модели для симуляции интерактивных миров Модель генерирует фотореалистичные сцены в реальном времени, которые можно менять командами на естественном языке: добавлять объекты, менять погоду, двигать камеру. По сравнению с Genie 3 заметно выросла реалистичность физики и движений персонажей. Добавилась генерация звука - фоновые шумы, музыка, диалоги, подстраивающиеся …

👍5😁2❤1🤯1

27 Oct 2026, 12:00 UTC≈3,290 views58 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @pppanchikPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

😁40🙈7❤6👍2💯2🫡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 77 posts we hold for @ppprompt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @ppprompt as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
28 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
28 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
4 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Aug 2026, 20:52 UTCAnonymous Poll454 voters

Что важнее?

  1. Model38%
  2. Harness44%
  3. 😇32%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 77 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Миша, давай по новой
@misha_davai_po_novoi · 19,123
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 October 2026
НейроProfit | Соня Pro Ai
@NeuralProfit · 23,625
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 September 2026
CyberYozh AI Security
@CyberYozh_AI_security · 26,008
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 September 2026
Neurogen
@neurogen_news · 22,916
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 September 2026
Tips AI | IT & AI
@tips_ai · 25,790
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 September 2026
Метаверсище и ИИще
@cgevent · 53,591
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
Малоизвестное интересное
@theworldisnoteasy · 74,298
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
Бурый
@sburyi · 20,159
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 4 October 2026
Ai molodca
@strangedalle · 47,602
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 27 August 2026
Силиконовый Мешок
@prompt_design · 92,791
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
Not Boring Tech
@notboring_tech · 21,122
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 September 2026
GPT/ChatGPT/AI Central Александра Горного
@aioftheday · 44,602
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
Neural Shit
@NeuralShit · 54,643
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
Нейроскептик
@neuroskep · 29,744
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
Denis Sexy IT 🤖
@denissexy · 140,753
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
эйай ньюз
@ai_newz · 98,339
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 16 August 2026
Сиолошная
@seeallochnaya · 81,254
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
Руслан Гамзатов | AI маркетинг
@AIGamzatov · 33,948
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
LLM под капотом
@llm_under_hood · 30,219
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 9 September 2026
НЕЙРОГРАМОТНОСТЬ
@edu4telegram · 76,777
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 29 August 2026
Lama AI
@lama_channel_gpt · 24,017
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 September 2026
TechSparks
@techsparks · 46,736
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 August 2026
Serge_AI 1.0
@serge_ai · 56,422
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 August 2026
Технологии | Нейросети | Боты
@aiaiai · 174,276
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 50 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ppprompt | Sexy AI Prompts & Experiments | by @ponchiknews” (@ppprompt), 15,553 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ppprompt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.