Технологии, финансы, аналитика и пропаганда.
Куратор: Илья Пестов.
По рекламе: @nazaretsky
РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67a391c4a16f1b55428d381a
Полезные видео: @grokstv
Тест на логику: @psylogicbot
Created
16 April 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
66 measurements spanning 98 days, net +312. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42,009–43,257 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 66
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 19:38
42,490
+14
10 Nov 2026, 01:26
42,476
-14
8 Nov 2026, 12:50
42,490
-10
7 Nov 2026, 03:47
42,500
+4
6 Nov 2026, 02:36
42,496
-5
5 Nov 2026, 05:28
42,501
-2
4 Nov 2026, 06:15
42,503
-8
3 Nov 2026, 04:49
42,511
-3
1 Nov 2026, 03:49
42,514
-2
31 Oct 2026, 04:09
42,516
-1
30 Oct 2026, 06:00
42,517
-19
29 Oct 2026, 04:57
42,536
+18
28 Oct 2026, 01:29
42,518
-2
27 Oct 2026, 04:20
42,520
+5
26 Oct 2026, 06:44
42,515
+8
25 Oct 2026, 07:27
42,507
-7
24 Oct 2026, 06:07
42,514
-13
23 Oct 2026, 09:04
42,527
-10
22 Oct 2026, 11:29
42,537
+4
21 Oct 2026, 05:30
42,533
first reading
Engagement
179 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 195 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
39.6%
avg views ÷ 42,490 subscribers
Avg views / post
16,800
56 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
56
of 179 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
179 (29 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
942,160
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 00:14 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈746
Videos
≈125
Links
≈3,590
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
11m 36s
Average length
1m 03s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
Ad load
1.68%
3 of 179 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
15,000
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
17,000
over 176 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqwcP1j1
1
18 August 2026
18 August 2026
2W5zFHTESbb
1
22 October 2026
22 October 2026
2W5zFHxHwGM
1
23 October 2026
23 October 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 179 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 19 of 56 posts held from the last 30 days (33.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Трансформация классического SEO в GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) становится ключевым трендом в корпоративном маркетинге. Сегодня руководству компаний уже недостаточно традиционных показателей в поисковой выдаче — фокус смещается на присутствие бренда в ответах искусственного интеллекта и генерации лидов через нейросети.
Для бизнеса это новый вызов: алгоритмы ИИ часто рекомендуют конкурентов или некорректно инт…
В Казани тем временем собираются проводить электрообогрев тротуаров. Не, ну а чё? По сугробам же неудобно ходить. А запасы энергии у нас планетарного масштаба. Поэтому можем себе такое позволить. Вот это, кстати, реальная борьба с климатом, а не вся эта зелёная херомантия с углеродными следами.
https://www.tatar-inform.ru/news/v-kazani-provedut-eksperiment-po-elektroobogrevu-trotuara-6048195
Я тут углубился в устройство евробюджета (не путать с консолидированными бюджетами стран Еврозоны). Так вот, обязательства (commitments) Европарламента систематически превышают платёжные ассигнования. Получается, и здесь дефициты? — Нет, тут всё хитрее.
По уставу ЕС доходы и расходы бюджета должны быть сбалансированы. То есть дефицита у Европарламента по определению быть не может. Однако там есть понятие RAL (reste …
Пха! Канцлер Германии Украины Фридрих Мерц выдвинул ЕС ультиматум и пригрозил заблокировать следующий семилетний бюджет Евросоюза в случае отказа стран объединения финансировать Незалежную. Цитирую Financial Times:
В декабре прошлого года лидеры ЕС договорились о выделении Украине кредита в размере 90 млрд евро, но масштабы военной агрессии России против своего соседа таковы, что Киев заявил о необходимости дополнит…
В Блумберге вышла публикация «Russia’s Japan Tobacco Grab Is Risk for Takaichi’s Spending Plan». И, оказывается, крупнейшим акционером японской табачной компании является правительство Японии, которое в виде дивидендов от JTI получает около $650 млн ежегодно.
Не забывайте, что когда Роснефть частично находится в госсобственности, то это плохой госкапитализм и отсутствие рынка, а если табачка в японской госсобственно…
Рубрика занимательных статистических фактов за последнее время:
• Более 470 млрд руб. направят на строительство студенческих кампусов в 17 городах. Суммарная площадь объектов составит порядка 2 млн кв. м. А в настоящее время в различной стадии реализации уже находится 25 проектов в 23 регионах общей площадью около 3 млн кв. м. Рекомендую взглянуть только на то, что с МГУ делается — это просто «Вау!». Короче, со сле…
Маск сворачивает производство Cybertruck. Cox Automotive оценивает продажи данной модели всего в 11.5 тыс единиц в США за не полный 2026 год (это провал), но гениальный маркетолог Маск объяснил закрытие проекта необходимостью высвободить мощности для производства Cybercab.
Главный прикол: в 2019 году, когда Tesla анонсировала свой пикап, Маск собрал около 650 тыс предзаказов на него. Предзаказы были платные. Сто бак…
Дежурно напоминаю, что помимо Грокса у меня ещё есть канал Чванство о курьёзах мировой политоты, который эволюционировал в отдельный проект с большими вдумчивыми текстами. Шеф-редактор Чванства — Антон Галактионов, бывший руководитель пресс-службы губернатора Костромской области.
https://t.me/chvans
А вот этого, кстати, Рютте не говорил. Я заставил ИИшку послушать подкаст на нидерландском. Мол, неужели, глава НАТО сменил риторику? — Нет, не сменил. Это наши тупые медийщики перемогу разгоняют и создают ложные ожидания. Рютте сказал лишь то, что «вряд ли Украина вернет всю свою территорию».
Неоднократно писал об этом (раз, два, три, четыре), но из уст главы НАТО оно в любом случае звонче: Россия может закупить больше вооружений, чем европейские страны-участницы НАТО, при сопоставимых расходах.
«Покупательная способность денег [в российской экономике] гораздо выше, чем у нас. Это связано с тем, как устроена их экономика. На эти деньги они могут купить больше», — сказал Рютте в эфире нидерландского телек…
Рынок встречает ослов. Один лишь Илон Маск миллиардов на 100 долларов беднее стал за сегодня. А всё потому, что ИИ — это темка республиканцев, а демократы топят за регулирование.
Крупнейшая банковская группа Японии Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group запускает цифровой банк без банковских карт. Чтобы получить наличные, достаточно отсканировать QR-код в мобильном приложении, — с гордостью пишет Nikkei.
Инновации! Технологии! Диджитал!
Забавно, что согласно байкам русских либералов, Россия отстаёт от Японии примерно на 30 лет, а согласно байкам русских коммунистов, Россия до сих паразитирует на ве…
Showing the 12 most recent of 179 posts we hold for @groks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@groks edited 11 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 7 posts on @groks as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
10 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
9 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
4 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
4
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 64 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 52 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
5
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
4
vacant every time we have ever looked
@groks named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@peterwildeford named in 1 post, 24 September 2026 – 24 September 2026 · confirmed gone 14 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@radio_sputnik named in 5 posts, 20 September 2026 – 28 September 2026
@dkokotajlo named in 1 post, 24 September 2026 – 24 September 2026
@maxnadeau_ named in 1 post, 24 September 2026 – 24 September 2026
@rt_russian named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Математик в Лондоне @mathbotan · 26,347 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 September 2026
Кримсон Дайджест @crimsondigest · 141,033 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
Итак, это Панов @itakblet · 25,142 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 September 2026
Мараховское время @vmarahovsky · 60,505 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 August 2026
Миша Жуховицкий @juhovitskiy · 47,846 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 30 August 2026
Ряды Фурье @Fourier_series · 43,923 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 August 2026
ФИНСАЙД @finside · 20,222 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 September 2026
TechSparks @techsparks · 46,736 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 August 2026
RationalAnswer | Павел Комаровский @RationalAnswer · 110,207 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 15 August 2026
Малоизвестное интересное @theworldisnoteasy · 74,298 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
Spydell_finance @spydell_finance · 131,111 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
Дизраптор @disruptors_official · 72,494 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 August 2026
Evening Prophet @eveningprophet · 19,092 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 5 October 2026
Графономика @topinfographic · 20,118 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 September 2026
Angry Bonds @angrybonds · 24,239 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 September 2026
Простая экономика @prostoecon · 303,143 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
Рациональные числа @rationalnumbers · 25,574 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 September 2026
The Edinorog 🦄 @Theedinorogblog · 44,127 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
Инфляционный шок! @inflation_shock · 39,789 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
Ватфор | Автострадный think tank @vatfor · 32,343 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 5 September 2026
Forbes Russia | The Globals @forbesglobalrus · 23,106 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
Нецифровая экономика @antidigital · 24,491 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 September 2026
Кимономика @kimonomika · 23,929 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 September 2026
Стартап дня. Александр Горный. @startupoftheday · 62,567 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 117 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Грокс” (@groks), 42,490 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/groks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
