Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Малоизвестное интересное

@theworldisnoteasy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

73,930subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001090966837
TypeChannel
Username@theworldisnoteasy
DescriptionАвторский взгляд через призму новейших исследований на наше понимание реальности, человеческой сущности и того, как ИИ меняет их. Зарегистрирован в РКН. Зеркало канала - https://dzen.ru/the_world_is_not_easy Рекламы и ВП в канале нет. Пишите на @karelovs
Created14 October 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/theworldisnoteasy

Growth

73,91673,94073,9285 August 2026 — 73,939 subscribers6 August 2026 — 73,939 subscribers6 August 2026 — 73,940 subscribers7 August 2026 — 73,939 subscribers8 August 2026 — 73,918 subscribers9 August 2026 — 73,923 subscribers10 August 2026 — 73,916 subscribers11 August 2026 — 73,917 subscribers12 August 2026 — 73,926 subscribers13 August 2026 — 73,930 subscribers73,9305 August 202613 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 7 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 73,912–73,944 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 00:3773,930+4
12 Aug 2026, 02:4373,926+9
11 Aug 2026, 04:5173,917+1
10 Aug 2026, 04:1173,916-7
9 Aug 2026, 05:5373,923+5
8 Aug 2026, 02:4173,918-21
7 Aug 2026, 00:0073,939-1
6 Aug 2026, 02:4073,940+1
6 Aug 2026, 01:3573,939no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:0273,939first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 27 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.7%
avg views ÷ 73,930 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,500
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held22 (27 June 202610 August 2026)
Views total217,940
Reactions total2,363
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 07:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
439
Videos
16
Links
2,130

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

3,234 reactions across 21 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,25169.6%
🤔65820.3%
👎1574.85%
😱973.00%
🤯712.20%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,418reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
124
across the posts below
Posts paid on
16
of 22 we hold a reading for · 73%
Most on one post
28
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @theworldisnoteasy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 June 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 11:19 UTC≈6,500 views157 reactions28 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Последствия урагана Джей: сознание поймали, а его хозяина – нет. Открытие J-space вызвало 12-ти балльный шторм вокруг сознания Claude Сенсация в том, что исследователи Anthropic, похоже случайно, построили лабораторию, где можно изучать сознательный доступ отдельно от того, кому он принадлежит. В июле 2026 над акваторией искусственного разума произошел медиашторм максимальной силы - 12 баллов по «медиашкале Бофорта».

👍134🤔19👎4

8 Aug 2026, 14:52 UTC≈9,040 views167 reactions4 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Самые опасные эмпаты могут ничего не чувствовать Мы привыкли думать: если человек хорошо понимает ваши чувства, значит, он их разделяет, а если разделяет – значит, скорее поможет. Обе половины этой логики, похоже, могут оказаться ложными. Эмпатия кажется чем-то цельным, но нейронаука разбирает ее на детали. Есть когнитивная эмпатия – способность понять и смоделировать состояние другого. Есть аффективная – способность

👍129🤔28🤯8👎2

7 Aug 2026, 11:57 UTC≈10,100 views126 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Photo

Алгокогнитивная культура заговорила с обеих сторон Breaking News из позавчерашнего доклада специалистов OpenAI на Black Hat – не только в том, что автономные ИИ-агенты сами нашли уязвимости, вышли за пределы тестовой среды и атаковали Hugging Face. Не менее важно другое: впервые мы увидели, как культура начинает возникать на машинной стороне гибрида. В марте 2021 года я впервые написал о грядущем фазовом переходе чел

👍75🤔33👎11🤯7

5 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC≈12,400 views198 reactions6 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Первый компьютерный паразит, который похищает способность думать Рой из «Непобедимого» Станислава Лема начал собирать свое тело внутри человеческого интернета Исследователи университетов Торонто и Кембриджа запустили в изолированной сети ИИ-червя, который не просто размножался на зараженных машинах. Захватывая компьютеры с GPU, он превращал их в новые узлы собственного рассуждающего «мозга» – и использовал приобретен

👍107😱52🤔25👎7🤯7

4 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC≈13,800 views157 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Photo

ИИ с замахом на Луну: бесплатная китайская модель за 3 миллиона долларов Модель К3 от китайской компании Moonshot AI (буквально «ИИ с замахом на Луну») взорвала мир ИИ. Еще бы: MoE-модель с открытыми и бесплатно скачиваемыми весами, содержащая 2,8 трлн общих и 104 млрд активных параметров, почти сравнялась по многим тестам с крутейшими американскими закрытыми дорогими моделями. Силиконовая долина в смятении. Илон Мас

👍123🤔22👎9🤯3

1 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC≈14,100 views147 reactions3 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Мой прогноз про горизонт событий к 2030 держится на одном допущении: что ИИ научится задавать вопросы, которые никому и никогда не приходили в голову. Но пока – не умеет. Ибо для этого нужен прыжок, который когда-то сделал Эйнштейн Об этом же – почти одновременно и независимо друг от друга – написали исследователь Google DeepMind и трое известных учёных с абсолютно разных научных полюсов. Автор 1й работы Том Захави –

👍110🤔25👎12

29 Jul 2026, 12:14 UTC≈16,900 views184 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Истинная причина, почему Google «выбыл» из ИИ-гонки названа, «и это меняет всё» Сегодня это самая обсуждаемая новость по версии AI Bulletin … о которой я подробно пишу ужу 1.5 года Первые отклики на новое эссе Альберто Ромеро (его название и ссылка в заголовке) впечатляют: «Это лучшая статья о том, как технологии, лежащие в основе ИИ, влияют на бизнес в сфере ИИ, которую я когда-либо читал» [.] «… эта статья – наибол

👍129🤔47👎6🤯2

28 Jul 2026, 14:57 UTC≈13,900 views183 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

В 2026 Филдсовская премия в последний раз присуждена математикам – людям. А в 2030 математика достигнет «горизонта событий», и тогда произойдет смена реальности: «пандемия среди математиков», потеря мотивации и разрыв преемственности В заголовке прогноз Алека Димитриева (разработчик алгоритмов вывода ИИ Claude в Anthropic), которым он ответил Ноаму Брауну (разработчику алгоритмов рассуждения ИИ GPT в OpenAI), так опи

🤔90👍76👎10😱7

27 Jul 2026, 09:40 UTC≈11,700 views80 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

ИИ больше не просто участник истории. Он встроился в её наследственный аппарат. Июньский выпуск «Линз будущего» – о том, как среда начала воспроизводить условия собственного существования. «Мы – не материя, которая сохраняется, а паттерны, которые воспроизводят себя», – писал Норберт Винер. В июне 2026-го эта формула перестала быть философской метафорой. На поверхности месяц выглядел как россыпь несвязанных сюжетов:

👍51🤔15👎14

25 Jul 2026, 13:08 UTC≈15,100 views142 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Photo

На Земле уже около 30 миллионов супер-инфоргов В 2026 их число удваивается каждые 55 дней Еще 4 года назад я предупреждал: «Мы живем в интересное время. На смену антропоцену, эпохе технологического освоения материи и энергии, приходит новацен – эпоха технологического освоения информации. И жить в новой эпохе, скорее всего, будут не Homo sapiens, а инфорги – люди следующего поколения, проводящие в онлайфе (цифровой он

👍87🤔37👎17🤯1

23 Jul 2026, 13:22 UTC≈17,800 views121 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Photo

Собирающимся учиться на MBA: ваша карьерная лестница обваливается Лучшая ИИ-модель уже закрывает 88,4% ожидаемого анализа в реальных кейсах бизнес-школ – по финансам, стратегии, переговорам, HR и деловой этике. Это данные нового препринта исследователей из Уортона, Карнеги-Меллон, Пенсильванского университета и Гарвардской школы бизнеса, авторов бенчмарка BusinessCaseBench: 615 экзаменационных вопросов по 238 реальны

👍74🤔33👎7🤯7

20 Jul 2026, 11:24 UTC≈20,400 views174 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Photo

Мы боялись, что ИИ станет похож на человека, но происходит как раз обратное. И первым это на себе заметил не блогер-алармист, а профессор математики. Андрей Хренников — не персонаж из «Назад в будущее», внезапно увидевший апокалипсис в чат-боте. Это российско-шведский математик и физик-теоретик, профессор Университета Линнея в Швеции, директор International Center for Mathematical Modeling. Область интересов — кванто

👍110🤔46👎9😱8🤯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @theworldisnoteasy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 5,638 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Агрегатор рациональности :: Uncolored
@wildthread · 73
6 posts
Футурье
@futurier · 3
5 posts
ArtEmotioChain | Web 3 Life
@artemotiochain · 13,828
4 posts
AWTOR
@i_awtor · 16
4 posts
Кофе в космосе
@kofe_v_kosmose · 2,828
4 posts
Коняхин Вячеслав
@kons_2006 · 11
4 posts
Курилка Байдара
@kurilka_baydara · 77
4 posts
AliasSeed
@aliasseed · 37
3 posts
еще один канал
@anotherchannel · 31
3 posts
Bhrigu | Футурологическая платформа
@bhrigu_io · 81
3 posts
Digit2day
@digit2day · 29
3 posts
Чучвага
@e_chuchvaga · 94
3 posts
IA (INTELLIGENCE AMPLIFICATION). PHGTLSM
@phgtlsm_ia · 25
3 posts
PSY_MOTIONS
@psy_motions · 7
3 posts
Sarkis thinkers place
@SarkisG · 491
3 posts
Актуальные отношения
@act_novel · 776
2 posts
Занимательная паразитология
@activemeasure · 324
2 posts
Образы Единого Времени
@obrazedinoevremya · 15
2 posts
poleiko
@poleiko · 61
2 posts
Скотское семя
@skotskoesemya · 6
2 posts
AAA_Профит _ Движение 🏣
@a_cryptoschool · 106
1 post
ИИ стероиды для вас и вашего бизнеса!
@ai_benzoruk · 34
1 post
ИИ в науке, образовании и рынке труда
@aiobraz · 1,362
1 post
Будущее наступает
@aiworkfuture · 1,025
1 post
macroscope
@alsandventures · 4
1 post
Прогулки с Антикваром
@belgorodantiquus · 380
1 post
Боев молчи
@boev_molchi · 436
1 post
Bullshitjob
@bullshitjob · 43
1 post
Карбонгейт
@carbongate · 373
1 post
consciousness_materials
@consciousness_materials · 39
1 post
Киберлунье ⸎
@cyberium_moon · 91
1 post
Утиные истерИИ
@DuckFails · 13
1 post
Записки инженера
@EngineersNotes · 558
1 post
Этика и цифра | Тренды, анализ, истории
@ethics_and_digital_technologies · 621
1 post
EVGENY ALPINSKY ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
@evgenyalpinsky · 62
1 post
ЖЕЛЕЗНЯК
@FidelisEtForfis · 16
1 post
Fun Science
@funscience · 34,566
1 post
ГЕНИИ
@generativii · 37
1 post
Кривоносов 🔥 GeniUm 🚀
@genium_team · 1,145
1 post
Hack DJI
@hackdji · 743
1 post
{хай концепт} by annaveps
@highconceptt · 226
1 post
Сергей Тихонов / HRD, карьерный эксперт, профориентолог
@HRsergeytikhonov · 1,534
1 post
humanimalien
@humanimalien_monster · 1,611
1 post
Оношко
@kopeek29 · 3,252
1 post
Так говорил Лем
@lemtalking · 229
1 post
Библиотекарь
@librarycafe · 1,351
1 post
McFly Review
@mcflyreview · 351
1 post
Ошибки мышления
@mindbuuugs · 260
1 post
Сломавшееся будущее
@ne_nado_blah_blah · 310
1 post
Ignition of cognition
@neurobros · 222
1 post
Obraz
@obrazpublic · 8,309
1 post
О книгах и не только
@oknigahiodrugom · 16
1 post
Постренессанс
@postrenaissance · 252
1 post
Плач Єремії
@psvschannel · 300
1 post
Реальная Вселенная
@RealVerse · 1,339
1 post
И все у нас так
@redactorme · 1,115
1 post
Развитие региона. #1000_идей для Свердловской области
@Region166 · 57
1 post
ПОДНЕБЕСНЫЕ ЗАПИСКИ Китай своими глазами
@sdselivanova · 2,072
1 post
ShaoShur
@ShaoIm · 34
1 post
Техноколаб
@Technocolab · 47
1 post
Такая страна
@Tstrana · 1,078
1 post
VD TeLeG
@VDTELEG · 90
1 post
Боец невидимого фронта
@visvisvisviss · 2,786
1 post
Сопричастное стратегирование и проектирование от Сергея Журавлева
@vozmozhnostie · 234
1 post
Анатолий Баляев
@vsosvazano · 646
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 81 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Психология Маркетинга
@marketpsy · 175,891
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 12 August 2026
Denis Sexy IT 🤖
@denissexy · 134,740
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Малоизвестное интересное” (@theworldisnoteasy), 73,930 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/theworldisnoteasy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.