Channel
@beloveshkin
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9,477subscribers
-25 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001194385771 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @beloveshkin |
| Created | 29 January 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/beloveshkin |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:25 | 9,477 | -13 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 9,490 | -12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 9,502 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 9,502 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (5 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 11,663 |
| Reactions total | 287 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
461 reactions across 24 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 166 | 36.0% | |
| 👍 | 137 | 29.7% | |
| 💔 | 36 | 7.81% | |
| 👀 | 24 | 5.21% | |
| 😭 | 24 | 5.21% | |
| 💯 | 22 | 4.77% | |
| 🌚 | 20 | 4.34% | |
| 😁 | 14 | 3.04% | |
| ✍ | 5 | 1.08% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 0.868% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.651% | |
| 😐 | 2 | 0.434% | |
| 🥱 | 2 | 0.434% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.217% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 0.217% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 461reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
7. Be a missionary of your ideas, values, and beliefs. Tell people everywhere what you do and why you do not do certain things, and why they are important to you. Be a mentor, teach, spread, and plant the seeds of these ideas and values. https://belaveshkin.substack.com/p/see-no-evil-hear-no-evil-speak-no
👍4
Signed Andrew Belaveshkin
Criticizing is easy and pleasant, especially when a person is wrong. Angry condemnation, public ridicule, and debunking propaganda, conspiracy theories, incorrect treatment methods, and misconceptions seem important and useful. But is that really so? Real facts and observations suggest the opposite. By ridiculing and criticizing, we spread harmful ideas and memes and make their supporters even more convinced of them.…
👍2
Signed Andrew Belaveshkin
🤍 Hugs aren’t the only way to stimulate oxytocin ✓ Eye-to-eye contact ✓ Affectionate touch, massage & holding hands ✓ Warm social interaction ✓ Giving and receiving compliments ✓ Expressing gratitude ✓ Deep personal conversations ✓ Laughing and singing together ✓ Synchronized movement and shared activities ✓ Caring for others ✓ Interacting with babies and children ✓ Playing with dogs ✓ Looking at cute babies, puppies…
❤40
Signed Andrew Belaveshkin
Acceptance therapy. “Fate leads the willing and drags the unwilling.” — Seneca, Moral Letters to Lucilius, Letter 107 Ducunt volentem fata, nolentem trahunt. Author: Hugo Lederer. Title: Das Schicksal (“Fate”). Year: 1905.
❤12👍6🌚1
Signed Andrew Belaveshkin
Absurdity is a weapon. When you drag propaganda or lies into your feed “just to laugh at them” or to say, “Look at these idiots,” the idiots are you. The more absurd the lie, the more deeply it can hook you emotionally — and the more deeply you may remember it. You become the Trojan horse: spreading the lie yourself and reinforcing it with emotion. It doesn’t matter whether you laugh at it or hate it. You’re help…
👍11💯6❤2
Signed Andrew Belaveshkin
Photo, posted without a caption
❤4
Signed Andrew Belaveshkin
If you pick up an ordinary lottery ticket, it looks harmless compared to injectable drugs — but it can cause comparable harm. People have long noticed the corrupting influence of gambling: Plato and Aristotle criticized gambling as a vice leading to loss of self-control. In the Sigalovada Sutta, gambling is named as one of the causes of a person's downfall and is viewed as an activity that intensifies greed, attachme…
❤18👍3
Signed Andrew Belaveshkin
10 ideas for how a mirror can benefit your health ✅1. Mirrors and body image. Body image and mirror therapy. Mindfully looking at yourself in a full-length mirror (mirror exposure, ME)—nonjudgmentally, in the present moment—can reduce body dissatisfaction ✅2. Mirrors and self-reflection. Mirror practice can increase self-compassion, reduce self-criticism, and develop the habit of looking at yourself with approval. …
❤6👍3
Signed Andrew Belaveshkin
Nothing predicts future behavior as much as past impunity. We know there are two ways to destroy a nation: punishing the innocent and not punishing the guilty, and recently we have seen both simultaneously. This exchange was a double impunity – Putin was not punished for persecuting political prisoners and was not punished for ordering a hitman to kill people. The release of a serial killer and his heroic acclaim is …
💯8👍3👀1
Signed Andrew Belaveshkin
— This is the hottest summer of my life. — Don't worry. It's also the coolest summer you'll experience for the rest of your life.
👀17🌚7❤2
Signed Andrew Belaveshkin
Excessive information does not just fail to improve decision-making; it can worsen it. The abundance of information can be a surrogate for behavioral change, tricking us into consuming information rather than engaging in the desired behavior. ✅Health podcasts and health For example, heavy consumption of health-related podcasts doesn't correlate with increased physical activity or implementing healthy habits. Instea…
👍7✍5👏3
Signed Andrew Belaveshkin
No, I didn’t kill the children by taking way their food and medicine. It was all the people who didn’t provide them food and medicine after I took the food and medicine that killed the children: https://muskdeathcount.com/
🌚5😁2
Signed Andrew Belaveshkin
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @beloveshkin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 303,466 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dr. Belaveshkin” (@beloveshkin), 9,477 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beloveshkin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.