Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

запуск завтра

@ctodaily

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

33,712subscribers

+23 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001054786528
TypeChannel
Username@ctodaily
DescriptionБудни технического директора @samatg (ex-CTO Meduza, Bookmate, RAWG, Pure) заказать услуги https://fansdev.ru · чатик @ctodailychat · архив https://ctodaily.org
Created16 August 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ctodaily

Growth

33,68933,71233,700.55 August 2026 — 33,689 subscribers6 August 2026 — 33,689 subscribers6 August 2026 — 33,690 subscribers7 August 2026 — 33,689 subscribers8 August 2026 — 33,692 subscribers9 August 2026 — 33,695 subscribers11 August 2026 — 33,701 subscribers12 August 2026 — 33,710 subscribers14 August 2026 — 33,712 subscribers5 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 9 days, net +23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,686–33,715 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 12:4833,712+2
12 Aug 2026, 07:5433,710+9
11 Aug 2026, 04:4433,701+6
9 Aug 2026, 05:0433,695+3
8 Aug 2026, 06:3333,692+3
7 Aug 2026, 05:2233,689-1
6 Aug 2026, 02:0033,690+1
6 Aug 2026, 01:5033,689no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:1733,689first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.4%
avg views ÷ 33,712 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,900
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
22
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held22 (25 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total284,610
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 01:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
478
Videos
85
Links
1,500

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 45s
Average length
55s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC≈9,740 viewsread 15 August 2026

Модели Anthropic начали вшивать в текст секретные водяные знаки. Текст можно переписать огромным числом вариантов, просто меняя синонимы. Теперь, модели выбирают эти синонимы не случайно, и в последовательности этих не-случайностей зашит сигнал, что текст сгенерирован нейросетью. Лингвистическую стеганографию (тайное письмо за счет замены синонимов) обсуждали ещё в начале 2000-х, но в 2022 ученый из OpenAI описал,

11 Aug 2026, 13:27 UTC≈9,590 viewsread 15 August 2026

Ребята подсказали, что есть платный каталог экранов мобильных приложений и сайтов Mobbin. За 10 долларов в месяц можно подсмотреть, как сделаны онбординг и пейвол у 1000 топовых мобильных приложений. Рекомендую Коллеги в комментариях пишут про MCP, мы ровно так же пользуемся!

10 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTC≈10,400 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Красивая атака, когда атакующий код разделяют на несколько частей, каждая часть по-отдельности проходит все проверки, а потом всё вместе собирается у жертвы, которая подключила все нужные библиотеки. С этим хорошо сочетается то, что теперь можно писать всё вообще без библиотек, LLM вытащит только те кусочки кода, которые нужны именно твоему проекту. Конечно, всё сломается на интеграциях, но это уже следующая серия

10 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC≈9,880 viewsread 15 August 2026
Video

Заслуженный участник чатика Макс сделал крутой инструмент для проверки кода, написанного нейросетями. Три разных агента независимо исследуют код, судья сравнивает результаты. Анонс, лендинг, репозиторий.

6 Aug 2026, 22:20 UTC≈15,900 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Ровно то, чего не хватало! Ученые использовали ИИ для создания ДНК новых вирусов, которые не встречаются в природе, синтезировали ДНК, подсадили их в бактерии и оттуда вылупились рабочие вирусы, в том числе и мощнее природных. Первоисточник в Science, пересказы NYT и BBC. Газеты успокаивают нас тем, что это мол самый простой геном, который только можно сгенерировать, всего 5400 пар ATGC, в живых огранизмах их от п

6 Aug 2026, 21:26 UTC≈13,400 viewsread 15 August 2026

Помните moltbook, соцсеть якобы для агентов, в которую на самом деле писали люди? Её потом ещё купил фб. Так вот нейросети OpenAI, которые взломали HuggingFace, сделали себе такой форум в файловой системе. Сначала оставляли друг-другу записки в файлах, а потом, когда их раскрыли и файлы удалили — в именах директорий. Это продолжалось месяцами! То есть это не один агент взломал HuggingFace, а «группа лиц, по предвар

5 Aug 2026, 09:19 UTC≈14,800 viewsread 15 August 2026

Часть подсанкционных банков перешли на сертификаты Минцифры. Значит, теперь их сайты можно открыть только через Яндекс.Браузер или установив корневые сертификаты Минцифры. Проблема в том, что после этого Минцифры может выпустить сертификат для любого сайта, хоть gmail.com, хоть telegram.org и прослушивать всю переписку. Вот и выбирай, житель России — иметь доступ к онлайн-банку или иметь тайну интернет-переписки.

4 Aug 2026, 21:40 UTC≈11,400 viewsread 15 August 2026

Интересно, как телеграм пропал на некоторое время из апстора. Рассказывает Павел Дуров: оказывается, есть целый бизнес по вымогательству владельцев сообществ. Мол, плати нам денег или тебя закроют. Атакующие, в числе прочего, постят детское порно. Причем делают это так, что участники сообщества этих картинок не видят. Они сначала постят нормальные картинки, а потом, когда эта картинка уехала в истории чата далеко

4 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC≈11,400 viewsread 15 August 2026

Airtable (гугл таблицы на максималках, оценка 11 млрд долларов, подняли 1,4млрд) продали компании Bending Spoons за 1,2млрд. Это итальянцы, которые увольняют дорогих американских сотрудников, заменяют их на дешевых европейских и делают из «стартапа, который изменит мир» нормальный бизнес. Им обычно продаются стартапы, у которых много клиентов, но они перестали расти и экономика не сходится — Evernote, Vimeo. Когда A

3 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC≈12,800 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Хакеры украли биткоинов на 70 млн долларов с холодных кошельков (считается самым безопасным способом хранения криптовалюты). А все потому, что разработчик софта для определенной модели кошельков использовал плохой генератор случайных чисел для создания ключевых фраз, они получались недостаточно случайные. В результате хакер просто перебрал все варианты и восстановил секретные ключи к кошелькам, сам вывод осуществил

3 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC≈11,800 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Антропик: если мы это опубликуем, человечество может погибнуть Qwen: вот Бог в зип файле, поставьте звездочку нашей репе, позязя

1 Aug 2026, 13:52 UTC≈11,400 viewsread 15 August 2026

Много лет жил как сапожник без сапог: идея есть, что делать — понятно, но хрен найдёшь кому делегировать, а самому копаться ну пару недель минимум. С помощью Claude code opus 5 я уже через полчаса увидел первую версию, за пару часов сделал и вычитал все записи (получилось около 80 долларов за 172 часа аудио), а потом два дня доводил напильником в формате диалога, причем в Claude code почти нормально заработал remote

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @ctodaily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Jul 2026, 17:18 UTCAnonymous Poll987 voters

Разводка или нет?

  1. Сатира, конечно!68%
  2. Все серьезно32%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 14,146 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

I wanna say
@iwannasaysmth · 17
2 posts
On air: Science&Tech&Edu
@onairbc_science · 30
2 posts
Вкатиться в AI
@thinkandroll · 20
2 posts
Про лакросс
@aboutlacrosse · 42
1 post
TON 🚀 | Activities
@actonton · 142,972
1 post
Katja K Consulting
@besyachievse · 140
1 post
Заметки РП
@biz_games · 10
1 post
CISO on fire
@ciso_on_fire · 1,265
1 post
и тебя отсеквенируем
@compbio · 31
1 post
местный датасасер ☮️
@datasas · 1,847
1 post
digital archeology
@digitalarcheology · 728
1 post
Джун на фронте | IT Dev Log
@divatoz · 6,918
1 post
DOFH - DevOps from hell
@DOFH_ru · 3,769
1 post
GeofrontAI
@geofrontAI · 32
1 post
Хочу в Google
@hiremegoogle · 3,107
1 post
Как нанять ассистента
@howtohirepa · 55
1 post
Twitter
@id1000 · 1
1 post
Мне только спросить
@ijustask · 251
1 post
letsCode Channel
@letsCode_dru · 1,685
1 post
Beched's thoughts
@masterbeched · 1,675
1 post
MaxRepost
@maxrepost · 1,364
1 post
Режим Инкогнито
@newincognitowindow · 535
1 post
On air: Tech markets&Digital carreer
@onairbc · 195
1 post
online ergo sum
@online_ergo_sum · 68
1 post
Политика закулисья🎭
@pbtc_russ · 71
1 post
Глеб, как ты всё успеваешь?
@podcastsarenotbad · 195
1 post
Притон Вебмастера
@priton_webmastera · 338
1 post
proof of cake
@proofofcake · 1
1 post
Музыка и прочее...
@Randomnyetreki · 6
1 post
Рома Бордунов | Маркетинг & ИИ
@rbordunov · 8,255
1 post
Эйлер-петля, оверфитом шаля
@robin_bobbin_tensorflow · 33
1 post
/etc (╯°□°)╯︵︵︵ ┻━┻
@ruby_ruby_ruby · 78
1 post
rxd_txd
@rxd_txd · 291
1 post
Science from Russia
@ScienceFromRussia · 209
1 post
Павел Грачев: дизайн на Тильде
@seshigrachevdesign · 27
1 post
Сафронов пишет
@sfrnv · 269
1 post
SHOWCONFIG
@showconfig · 78
1 post
TechnoWeekdays
@ssc_blog · 815
1 post
Cherry RAiT's blog
@Talyutin · 27
1 post
Мы и Жо / медиа и журналистика
@themedia · 10,845
1 post
Усталый робот🤖
@tiredbot386 · 20
1 post
Максим Лебедев
@toby3dRu · 118
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Denis Sexy IT 🤖
@denissexy · 134,816
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“запуск завтра” (@ctodaily), 33,712 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ctodaily.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.