У микрофона Костя @gorskiy. Сооснователь https://hirehire.ai и hirehire.me, экс-дизайн-руководитель в Интеркоме и Яндексе, папа дочки. Познаю мир и иногда делюсь тем, что мне интересно. Наблюдения и ссылки: @kostyafinds
Created
16 July 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 44 days, net -365. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,839–26,314 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 14:01
25,894
-22
16 Sept 2026, 08:19
25,916
-22
14 Sept 2026, 11:41
25,938
-8
12 Sept 2026, 19:18
25,946
-16
10 Sept 2026, 21:42
25,962
-20
7 Sept 2026, 20:57
25,982
-13
4 Sept 2026, 19:58
25,995
-16
3 Sept 2026, 01:15
26,011
-24
2 Sept 2026, 01:04
26,035
-17
31 Aug 2026, 21:34
26,052
-16
30 Aug 2026, 22:05
26,068
-12
29 Aug 2026, 18:35
26,080
-24
28 Aug 2026, 18:48
26,104
-9
27 Aug 2026, 16:46
26,113
-3
26 Aug 2026, 19:29
26,116
-7
25 Aug 2026, 23:03
26,123
-2
25 Aug 2026, 00:44
26,125
-2
23 Aug 2026, 12:44
26,127
-5
22 Aug 2026, 00:37
26,132
-3
20 Aug 2026, 17:44
26,135
first reading
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 19 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.7%
avg views ÷ 25,894 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,100
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 29 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held
29 (19 May 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total
61,230
Reactions total
1,446
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 10:28 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
346
Videos
1
Links
390
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
3,076 reactions across 28 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,621
52.7%
👎
490
15.9%
🔥
440
14.3%
👍
251
8.16%
🤯
97
3.15%
🤔
67
2.18%
😢
66
2.15%
🤬
28
0.91%
🕊
16
0.52%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,170 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
84
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 29 we hold a reading for · 45%
Most on one post
40
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @desprod. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 29 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 May 2026 to 24 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
13.8%
4 of 29 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
5,310
over 4 measured posts
Median views · rest
5,840
over 25 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 24 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
книжка новая пришла - Protocols by Andrew Huberman
читать только начал, и первое впечатление такое: КАК можно было накатать кирпич почти на 700 страниц воды мелкого текста про такие простые темы как сон, физкультура, стресс, питание, свет (что?), фокус и личностный рост (омг). Это всё названия частей книги в том порядке, как они стоят в оглавлении.
и заслуживают ли вообще эти темы СТОЛЬКО внимания?
ну вот и посмот…
наша радиоточка выходит в эфир с незапланированным сообщением
корреспонденты из Берлина передали, что наш скромный сайт зафичерил в своем докладе Kevin Cannon на дизайнерской конференции Hatch - как пример того, как надо сайты делать 🥹
На прошлой неделе собирался полететь в Лондон, а рейс отменили (вместе с несколькими сотнями других) из-за сбоя в диспетчерской системе.
Мне в итоге пришлось решить нетривиальный логистический паззл, чтобы поздно вечером выбраться из Ирландской глуши и оказаться в Лондоне на следующее утро.
А вот насколько это редкая ситуация?
Если с новыми моделями намного легче взломать всё что угодно, и если количество взломов …
Когда-то уже рассказывал, что мне нравятся каналы, в которых видна личность автора. Не просто какая-то одна тема, а спектр разных вещей, которые человеку интересны.
Сегодня хочу порекомендовать канал @maxvotek
Max Votek - ко-фаундер в Customertimes и инвестор. Компании 19 лет, 1000+ сотрудников, офисы в 9 странах, клиенты - американский крупняк - Abbott, Bayer, L'Oréal, Heineken и т. д.
Он выстроил большой бизнес …
В прошлый четверг появилась новость о том, что Bending Spoons покупают Miro за $1.36 млрд (с учётом кэша на счетах Miro ~$1.79 млрд).
Если вы не слышали про Bending Spoons, это очень любопытная итальянская компания. Что они делают:
- тщательно выбирают хорошие продуктовые компании (рассматривают сотни, делают всего несколько сделок в год)
- покупают их максимально дёшево (Miro купили примерно за 2.3 годовые выручки,…
я: стараюсь поменьше залипать в телефон
• давно удалил все приложения соцсетей
• делаю экран чёрно-белым (чтобы окружающий мир был ярче того, что в телефоне)
• минимизировал нотификации, и периодически выключаю их вообще совсем
Apple: вот тебе ещё больше крупных ярких экранов, можешь залипать в два приложения одновременно
P. S. а ещё вот странное, но я привык пользоваться телефоном левой рукой почему-то. Хотя пишу …
Обсуждали давеча с ребятами в нашей форум-группе, кто с чего бы начинал сейчас делать новый стартап. Ну, если бы захотелось начать с нуля.
У меня сейчас реакция однозначная: я бы начинал с продаж и/или тестирования спроса.
Интересно, конечно, что если взять меня пять лет назад, то я про такой подход тогда слышал, но внутри чувствовал совсем по-другому. Вот сначала сделаем классный продукт, а потом разберёмся.
Кост…
Подсмотрел у Саши Шамиса классный принцип, к которому можно стремиться в работе с AI
Он звучит так:
Единственное, что в компании должны делать люди - говорить.
Друг с другом (встречи) или с агентами (промпты). Всю остальную работу за компьютером агенты должны работать сами.
С нами в hirehire срезонировало сразу же, мы не так уж и далеки от этого принципа.
100% встреч у нас транскрибируется, и агенты автоматическ…
Похоже, наш новый сайт hirehire.me вызвал довольно полярные реакции. 43% из вас проголосовали за то, что это «стрём» — это много :(
Раз так, попробую немного объяснить анекдот, о чём мы думали.
Мы долго шли к этой версии, прошли внутри несколько редизайнов, пытаясь нащупать стиль. Делали воркшопы с командой, описывали ценности бренда, собирали референсы. И кое-что из того, что получилось, скоро тоже покажем.
В ито…
Давно ничего не писал про работу, пора бы и исправиться, тем более, что у нас очень много всего происходит.
Например, мы сделали новый сайт нашего агентства!
Очень им горжусь:
https://hirehire.me
Делали очень долго, переделывали много месяцев. Ужасно рад, что сайт доехал наконец до продакшена.
Как вам?
Каждый раз, когда прилетаю в условный Ереван, набрасываюсь на сырники.
Никогда их даже особенно не любил, пока мы не переехали в Ирландию. Там выяснилось, что в стране существует ровно 0 кафе, где можно заказать сырники. И поначалу особо этого не замечали. Только со временем хронический дефицит сырников в организме стал ощущаться явно.
Мы в итоге научились покупать творог, я научился готовить сырники и раз в пару н…
❤164🔥19👎8👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @desprod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@desprod edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
2 September 2026
Most recent edit
2 September 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 24 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
No Flame No Game @proproduct · 38,759 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026
Now How Channel @nowhow · 24,611 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 15 September 2026
UX Notes @uxnotes · 23,715 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
Игорь Кузнецов о темных паттернах @brainshare · 21,960 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 September 2026
Ваня Замесин @zamesin · 50,297 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
Daily Reminder @justakindreminder · 36,572 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 September 2026
Matskevich - brains, love and robots @Matskevich · 25,245 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
Дайджест продуктового дизайна @pdigest · 49,453 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
Hard Client @hardclient · 22,892 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 September 2026
Психология @PsyEducation · 59,345 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
Job for Designers @fordesigner · 24,592 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
Dumik @dumik · 22,244 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 September 2026
Продакты не нужны @betternotworse · 28,526 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 9 September 2026
дизайнерс.сайты @cyrillicdesign · 34,919 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 2 September 2026
Designdealer @designdealer · 86,726 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
Дизайнер, привет @jun_hi · 23,435 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 September 2026
Намочи манту @namochimanturu · 56,464 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
ИЩУ_ДИЗАЙНЕРА @designer_ru · 79,665 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
Secret Design @secretd · 22,350 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
ParaGraph @paradigm_graphics · 34,891 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 2 September 2026
Figma Design @figmadesign · 105,902 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
UI/UX Designer @uxidesign · 20,725 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 September 2026
Оди @awdee · 33,522 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 4 September 2026
GoPractice! @gopractice · 29,053 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 39 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kostya Gorsky’s Channel” (@desprod), 25,894 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/desprod.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.