Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Kostya Gorsky’s Channel

Channel

Kostya Gorsky’s Channel

@desprod

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

25,638subscribers

-621 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001136811977
TypeChannel
Username@desprod
DescriptionУ микрофона Костя @gorskiy. Сооснователь https://hirehire.ai и hirehire.me, экс-дизайн-руководитель в Интеркоме и Яндексе, папа дочки. Познаю мир и иногда делюсь тем, что мне интересно. Наблюдения и ссылки: @kostyafinds
Created16 July 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held65
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/desprod

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

25,63326,25925,94625,6385 August 202611 November 2026
65 measurements spanning 98 days, net -621. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,539–26,353 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 20:2825,638+1
10 Nov 2026, 00:1025,637-3
8 Nov 2026, 16:1925,640+7
7 Nov 2026, 07:0125,633-1
6 Nov 2026, 09:3625,634-4
5 Nov 2026, 07:3525,638-5
4 Nov 2026, 08:3925,643-6
3 Nov 2026, 08:2925,649-3
2 Nov 2026, 05:1825,652-3
1 Nov 2026, 07:0125,655-1
31 Oct 2026, 06:3525,656-5
30 Oct 2026, 08:1925,661-8
29 Oct 2026, 11:3825,669-3
28 Oct 2026, 10:1925,672+2
26 Oct 2026, 14:5425,670-2
25 Oct 2026, 12:0525,672-1
24 Oct 2026, 13:3625,673-1
23 Oct 2026, 15:1725,674-5
22 Oct 2026, 16:4625,679-3
21 Oct 2026, 10:1925,682first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 19 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 144 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.6%
avg views ÷ 25,638 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,520
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 October 2026
Posts held41 (19 May 2026 – 20 October 2026)
Views total27,110
Reactions total390
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 20:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
358
Videos
3
Links
398

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
43s
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,334 reactions across 40 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,36954.7%
👎65715.2%
🔥52512.1%
👍3467.98%
🤯1232.84%
🤬962.22%
🤔922.12%
😢821.89%
🕊441.02%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,428 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 20 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
111
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 41 we hold a reading for · 44%
Most on one post
40
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @desprod. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 41 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 May 2026 to 20 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
12.2%
5 of 41 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
5,850
over 5 measured posts
Median views · rest
5,820
over 36 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 20 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (16.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

20 Oct 2026, 15:46 UTC≈5,420 views82 reactions3 Starsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Дорогие дизайнеры! В 2026 все эти длинные бесконечные текстовые кейс-стади с блок-схемами в портфолио уже никто не хочет читать (наконец-то мы это признали!) Сейчас ребята обычно делают портфолио, в которых просто сразу видно красивый визуал и анимации. Обычно это видео, не скриншоты мокапов. Вот примеры портфолио знакомых, которые мне кажутся свежими в 2026: https://daria.works https://garri.cv https://mikeiu.com

❤82

19 Oct 2026, 14:05 UTC≈3,970 views15 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

В чём теперь moat, если продукт можно повторить за неделю? AI-бюджет растёт, а окупается ли он? За что платить человеку и как делить ответственность между людьми и агентами? Готовых ответов пока нет ни у кого, но есть люди, которые принимают такие решения в своих компаниях прямо сейчас. 22–23 октября проходит большая онлайн-конференция «Как оставаться конкурентным в эпоху AI» от R-Founders — это глобального сообщес…

❤15

16 Oct 2026, 12:49 UTC≈4,510 views99 reactions4 Starsread 11 November 2026
Video

можно как угодно (плохо) относиться к Илону Маску но, блин, ну как круто, что он продолжает делать запуски, которые: • взрывают мозг • расходятся тысячами мемов • сначала думаешь, что это AI-генерация, ну не может же такого быть в реальности мне вот этого очень не хватает в нашем мире стерильных одинаковых просчитанных безопасных продуктов если вы пропустили, это новая Tesla Roadster с ракетными двигателями и разг…

❤99

15 Oct 2026, 13:02 UTC≈4,620 views39 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

увидел емейл Figma последний, прочитал фразу "the full-stack creative canvas where teams, agents, and the materials you need come together", почувствовал, что пахнет Bending Spoons

❤39

14 Oct 2026, 12:09 UTC≈4,330 views3 reactionsread 11 November 2026
AdvertisementPhoto

Плейбук TripleTen: какие решения стоят за 40+ автоматизированными задачами медиабаинга У команды Максима Епифанова уже была отлаженная методология закупки рекламы. Вместе с AI marketing engineer из Plurio её описали в плейбуке: какие показатели отслеживать, за какой период оценивать результаты, при каких значениях масштабировать кампании, а при каких — останавливать. С учётом целей каждого продукта, региона и воронк…

❤3

13 Oct 2026, 15:06 UTC≈4,260 views152 reactions2 Starsread 11 November 2026

Подумываю ввести у нас в компании новое правило если мы хотим, чтобы какой-то наш текст (пост, емейл и т. д.) прочитали живые люди, то и писать этот текст должен живой человек это начинает казаться каким-то базовым уважением к читателю и пусть наш текст будет неидеальным. может даже с ошибками или с неточной пунктуацией. (часть меня не может поверить, что я это пишу - раньше всегда наоборот ценил грамотность. а те…

❤152

6 Oct 2026, 10:07 UTC≈6,220 views416 reactions15 Starsread 11 November 2026

Долго не мог решиться написать этот пост. Принял решение всё-таки выключить дизлайки в канале. В далёком 2024-м я похвастался, что не выключаю дизлайки -- в отличие от примерно всех моих знакомых. Много постов после этого мы с вами жили в мире и согласии, а дизлайки появлялись иногда у постов, с которыми вы были не согласны. И это был супер-ценный для меня сигнал. Этим летом я вдруг по мотивам поста про Мафию всп…

❤180👍89🤬63🕊28🤔23🤯22😢10🔥1

2 Oct 2026, 08:15 UTC≈6,420 views76 reactions3 Starsread 11 November 2026

Сложно поверить, что уже прошло 5 лет с тех пор, как я стал выпускником Эволюции Давным давно писал пост с подробностями Когда сейчас делаю zoom out и смотрю вообще на свою траекторию жизни, понимаю, что именно тогда началось самое большое моё изменение: завязал с дизайн-карьерой в найме и пустился во все тяжкие. Что в итоге получилось? - куча стресса - куча новых впечатлений и навыков - запустил пару компаний - м…

❤44👎28🔥3🤯1

1 Oct 2026, 08:33 UTC≈5,350 views43 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

А сегодня давайте на другую тему поговорим. Позавчера OpenAI провели свой Dev Day, на котором показали, помимо прочего, dots -- персонального агента (раскатывают сейчас на планах Pro и выше). Получается, прошло примерно полгода с момента, когда OpenClaw съел нам мозг многим понравился, до момента, когда похожие штуки запустили почти одновременно сразу несколько крупных игроков, в частности: - Muse -- версия Цукербе…

❤30👎12🤬1

1 Oct 2026, 08:32 UTC≈4,230 views37 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Мда, вижу, что предыдущий пост вам не зашёл. - То ли одного первого анонса было достаточно, а второй уже выглядит как повторение. - То ли неприятно читать про то, что «AI никогда не устаёт». Страшновато. - То ли вообще слишком банально вышло -- «круто, мы сделали текстовый интерфейс работы с агентом». Хотя мне казалось, что какими должны быть интерфейсы работы с агентами -- совсем ещё не решённый вопрос, хотелось эт…

❤29👎7🤬1

29 Sept 2026, 07:45 UTC≈4,560 views97 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Вчера начал рассказывать про Весну -- агента, который берёт на себя поиск людей для ваших вакансий и переписку с ними: https://vesna.hirehire.ai/alpha С самого начала работы мы выбрали такую концепцию, что Весна должна быть не очередным продуктом со своим интерфейсом, а именно что сотрудником. Буквально как сотрудник на удалёнке, которого вам порекомендовали. (Не хочется использовать слово «фрилансер», слишком оно …

👎58🔥22❤13🤔2🤬1😢1

28 Sept 2026, 16:06 UTC≈4,780 views108 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Мы тут ещё кое-что сумасшедше крутое на работе сделали. Спешу поделиться! Знаете, что больше всего меня утомляет в рекрутинге? - вручную искать кандидатов («сорсить», если по-рекрутерски говорить) -- но это важно, потому что самые сильные и наиболее подходящие для твоей роли люди не всегда активно ищут работу - вручную переписываться с найденными кандидатами -- но это тоже важно, потому что а как ещё понять, открыт …

🔥52👎29❤18😢4👍3🤬1🤯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @desprod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@desprod edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
2 September 2026
Most recent edit
2 September 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Sept 2026, 09:08 UTCAnonymous Poll1,150 voters approx.

как вам наш новый сайт?

  1. норм54%
  2. стрём46%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 20 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

No Flame No Game
@proproduct · 38,620
#1
Ваня Замесин
@zamesin · 50,097
#2
Канал Ильи Бирмана
@ilyabirman_channel · 14,097
#3
Скопин | Яндекс | dsgn-директор
@ilyaskopin · 9,981
#4
Дизайн-комьюнити
@sortofdesign · 12,479
#5
Kostya Gorsky's Finds
@kostyafinds · 1,579
#6
Миша Наер
@mikhailnaer · 8,250
#7
kyrillic
@kyrillic · 61,233
#8
Воркель 🧢 | Дизайн и продукт
@designvorkel · 10,057
#9
Дизайнер, привет
@jun_hi · 23,403
#10
как посмотреть
@kak_smotret · 10,063
#11
Now How Channel
@nowhow · 24,300
#12
Познавательная минутка от Курышева
@tasteofrain · 11,343
#13
Векк
@desiqn · 3,776
#14
Ponchik News | Алексей Иванов
@ponchiknews · 15,501
#15
Олег Александров
@olegschanel · 5,088
#16
Поясни за UX
@poyasnizaux · 19,986
#17
Продакты не нужны
@betternotworse · 28,396
#18
Черезнемогу / Надя Здорова
@chereznemogy · 4,829
#19
Шмит16
@Shmit16 · 17,608
#20
Всеволод Устинов (канал): Типичный водолей
@vsevolodustinovchannel · 16,478
#21
Игорь Кузнецов о темных паттернах
@brainshare · 21,719
#22
UX Notes
@uxnotes · 23,488
#23
Артемий Лебедев
@temalebedev · 968,108
#24
40D
@fortyD · 1,947
#25
коллективчик
@collectivchik · 6,172
#26
Rap, design, Berlin 🟡🔵
@Berlindesign · 657
#27
AI Happens
@aihappens · 14,524
#28
Это Лёша
@itslyoshatg · 3,064
#29
Matskevich - brains, love and robots
@Matskevich · 24,983
#30
Ilya Mutovin Channel
@ilyamutovin · 10,807
#31
Катя взрослеет🚀
@katyagrows · 4,134
#32
Дизраптор
@disruptors_official · 72,494
#33
Канал Толи Вербицкого
@io_parlo · 2,269
#34
addmeto
@addmeto · 72,001
#35
Дайджест продуктового дизайна
@pdigest · 49,003
#36
Product design · Студия «Луч»
@uxfail · 13,171
#37
ARE YOU EVE
@ayuev · 12,858
#38
Secret Design
@secretd · 22,102
#39
UX Live 🔥
@uxlive · 36,201
#40
[Женя Арутюнов ARCHIVE]
@e_arutyunov · 3,350
#41
дизайнерс.сайты
@cyrillicdesign · 34,390
#42
Адовый UX
@uxfromhell · 50,311
#43
vladzely.zip
@vladzelyzip · 3,580
#44
табличный дизайн
@thisisnotatable · 7,232
#45
Поток Замесина
@zamesin_flow · 8,455
#46
type.today
@typetoday · 9,224
#47
запуск завтра
@ctodaily · 33,704
#48
EDU
@ProductsAndStartups · 15,345
#49
Фичизм
@fichism · 25,314
#50
Denis Sexy IT 🤖
@denissexy · 140,753
#51
Dumik
@dumik · 21,756
#52
Design Jam
@design_jam · 6,722
#53
Мягкие техники — Кондауров Сергей
@soft_techniques · 4,689
#54
Designdealer
@designdealer · 85,834
#55
дизайнерс.приложения
@cyryllicapps · 4,623
#56
Blink links
@blinklinks · 3,208
#57
GoPractice!
@gopractice · 29,379
#58
мяу-дизайн
@meow_design · 2,985
#59
Ozøn Design
@ozondesign · 17,850
#60
Глеб Кудрявцев — продукты и бизнес
@glebkudr · 17,251
#61
Вправо Вверх 📈 Михаил Табунов
@bossofyourboss · 27,282
#62
Лю 🖤
@ldwg_channel · 2,537
#63
dui
@duiux · 6,594
#64
Wannabe like Rozov
@wannabelikerozov17feb · 16,017
#65
TechSparks
@techsparks · 46,736
#66
ChillHouse
@chillhousetech · 6,784
#67
Богдан Гончаренко про DesignOps
@b_goncharenko · 15,155
#68
Дудь
@yurydud · 849,220
#69
Оди
@awdee · 33,195
#70
Любовь, дизайн и метрики
@designavito · 10,389
#71
Рефы, привет
@refs_hi · 9,579
#72
Лабецкий практикует:
@dailybro · 2,040
#73
Макс Десятых, творческий руководитель
@tvoruk · 4,604
#74
Охуенно
@wowohuenno · 5,043
#75
Ne_znal_ai
@ne_znal_ai · 11,625
#76
Vikki UI © LNDN lead
@vikkidsgn · 4,011
#77
42 секунды
@ftsec · 19,385
#78
Фича дня by @hardclient
@featureoftheday · 12,237
#79
Мысли Романа
@shaaadrin · 1,853
#80
Just leave it here
@justleaveithere · 1,310
#81
turbabaza
@turbabaza · 714
#82
FEDOR BORSHEV
@pmdaily · 23,648
#83
Connectable Jobs
@zarubezhom_jobs · 106,423
#84
UX Horn 🌀
@uxhorn · 21,224
#85
Ушной канал Оленкевича
@ivanolenkevich · 723
#86
Это знак
@thatsasign · 4,422
#87
Local Talent | Design
@local_talent · 9,098
#88
désillusion
@dsllsn · 1,727
#89
DIMABARBANEL
@barbanel · 4,586
#90
Figma Design
@figmadesign · 104,864
#91
Как это сверстано
@kaketosverstano · 8,301
#92
Дизайн-снайпер
@designsniper · 27,989
#93
Craftwork — Design Assets
@craftworkdesign · 4,842
#94
R. G. B.
@newsrgb · 6,742
#95
Design Board
@DesignBoard · 9,370
#96
ROZGI
@rozgirozgi · 1,746
#97

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

No Flame No Game
@proproduct · 38,620
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026
Now How Channel
@nowhow · 24,300
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 15 September 2026
UX Notes
@uxnotes · 23,488
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
Игорь Кузнецов о темных паттернах
@brainshare · 21,719
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 September 2026
Ваня Замесин
@zamesin · 50,097
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
Daily Reminder
@justakindreminder · 36,340
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 September 2026
Matskevich - brains, love and robots
@Matskevich · 24,983
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
Дайджест продуктового дизайна
@pdigest · 49,003
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
Hard Client
@hardclient · 22,912
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 September 2026
Психология
@PsyEducation · 58,838
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
VadimAlesya_Key
@vadimalesyakey · 37,028
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 October 2026
Job for Designers
@fordesigner · 25,361
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
Dumik
@dumik · 21,756
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 September 2026
Продакты не нужны
@betternotworse · 28,396
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 9 September 2026
дизайнерс.сайты
@cyrillicdesign · 34,390
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 2 September 2026
Designdealer
@designdealer · 85,834
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
Дизайнер, привет
@jun_hi · 23,403
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 September 2026
Намочи манту
@namochimanturu · 56,208
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
Поясни за UX
@poyasnizaux · 19,986
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 September 2026
ИЩУ_ДИЗАЙНЕРА
@designer_ru · 81,619
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
Secret Design
@secretd · 22,102
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
ParaGraph
@paradigm_graphics · 34,204
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 2 September 2026
Figma Design
@figmadesign · 104,864
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
UI/UX Designer
@uxidesign · 20,384
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 September 2026

This channel appears in 41 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kostya Gorsky’s Channel” (@desprod), 25,638 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/desprod.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.