Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Лабецкий практикует:

@dailybro

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,104subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001460231793
TypeChannel
Username@dailybro
Created22 November 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dailybro

Growth

2,1042,1112,107.56 August 2026 — 2,111 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,111 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,109 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,108 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,104 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,103–2,112 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:482,104-4
9 Aug 2026, 23:352,108-1
6 Aug 2026, 17:362,109-2
6 Aug 2026, 11:212,111no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:592,111first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
44m 17s
Average length
44m 17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

662 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
39659.8%
🔥15122.8%
👍487.25%
❤‍🔥142.11%
💯142.11%
😁111.66%
👀71.06%
👏71.06%
🤔60.906%
50.755%
🎄10.151%
👌10.151%
🙏10.151%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 662reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2025 to 10 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
117
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 20 we hold a reading for · 70%
Most on one post
61
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dailybro. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2025 to 10 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
5.00%
1 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
1,370
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,560
over 19 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2025 to 10 June 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

10 Jun 2026, 09:04 UTC883 views9 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

Прочитал у Саши Журавлева (основатель Mento.VC) как в эпоху агентов стартап поднял 10 млн только на хорошем вижене финансовой системы. Пост навел на мысли про структуру ответственности агента. Что разработчик не сможет быть единственной точкой ответственности за ошибки агента. Это слишком большой и неуправляемый риск. Как и в платежах сейчас: за ошибку не всегда отвечает “разработчик сайта”; иногда отвечает банк, п

5🔥4

23 Apr 2026, 06:23 UTC961 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Уверен, что будущее всех компаний — это не набор продуктов notion+jira+figma+*, а единый продукт внутри компании, построенный от бизнес процессов, а не функционала. Не ожидал увидеть это уже сегодня в такой степени проработки. Очень круто

5💯5

23 Apr 2026, 06:23 UTC≈1,080 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @aleks_shamisVideo

Last week we demoed the product we built. Quiet a few people called it "insane." We replaced Notion, Airtable, GDrive, Docsend, Mailchimp with our own solution. Forms, Calendly, Spreadsheets, Email Management, Website CMS coming in the next few months. The idea behind this was to have all the data in one place and to enable the team to build any collaborative automation by saying "hey buddy, extract new contacts fr

5

12 Apr 2026, 12:32 UTC≈1,240 views34 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Как развить интуицию Ходил на прошлой неделе к кинезиологу, который, осмотрев меня, предположил, что есть проблемы с печенью. Я знаю, что это правда. У меня есть генетическая особенность с печенью, видел в анализах. Но как ты это понял без них? А ты хорооош. Такая интуиция мгновенно вызывает доверие. Я бы даже сказал, что для меня это обязательный критерий для сильного специалиста. Я видел, как такая интуиция раз

22🔥7👍3🤔2

16 Feb 2026, 06:55 UTC≈1,390 views57 reactions4 Starsread 7 August 2026

Упорство как форма страха Заметил у себя убеждение: “если я действительно чего-то хочу, то добьюсь”. Что-то такое очень раннее, из детства. Когда мир вокруг объясняли просто: не получилось, значит не хотел. Это убеждение помогало не сдаваться. Если взялся, значит хочу и нет дороги назад. Я пробовал, еще пробовал. Часто получалось. Но, со временем, я заметил конфликтующие убеждения. Есть вещи, которые не управляютс

41👍8🔥8

8 Feb 2026, 13:20 UTC≈1,370 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Что стартует из саморазвития в дружественных коммьюнити 1. Evolution.new в Лондоне и в Москве (март и апрель) Новые наборы от программы, в которой я являюсь консультантом. Если вы еще не знаете что такое Эволюция, напишите в комменты, расскажу. 2. Revision — от evolution.new (right now) Новый продукт от Evolution.new. Вкратце — 3 встречи с консультантами + тест, чтобы понять куда двигаться. Такой аналог планировани

11👍3🔥2

16 Nov 2025, 11:34 UTC≈2,020 views118 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026

Большая семья С детства представлял, что в старости у меня будет большая семья: дети, внуки, их семьи и друзья. Большой дом, в который все будут приезжать и проводить время. Такой уголок спокойствия и совместности. Недавно заметил, что в этом образе у меня было идеализированное ощущение отношений: всем со всеми хорошо, и поэтому в едином экстазе все собираются за одним столом. Сейчас понял, что за таким столом со

76❤‍🔥14😁11💯8🔥5👍2🎄1🙏1

29 Oct 2025, 09:26 UTC≈2,210 views69 reactions4 Starsread 7 August 2026

Про это нельзя говорить Гарантированный способ убить отношения — завести темы, о которых нельзя говорить. Деньги, вера, политика, слабости, желания, страхи, ожидания, секс. Любая тема, которую не принято обсуждать — рана на теле отношений. В больную рану не хочется тыкать, проще спрятать и игнорировать. Игнорирование запретных тем разрушает доверие. Я боюсь с тобой про это говорить, потому что не доверяю. Лучше сп

43👍14🔥8🤔4

4 Oct 2025, 11:56 UTC≈2,070 views17 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

Подкаст #4 Так же вчера опубликовали четвертый выпуск подкаста. На мой взгляд, это лучший эпизод из выложенных. Говорим про то, что в какой-то момент жизни ты больше не можешь быть только инструментом для достижения целей. Это запускает цикл исследования а как делать так, чтобы было легко, а не только через насилие над собой и ощущение «надо». У этого есть своя токсичная сторона: ты все время ищешь как делать то

9🔥6👍2

4 Oct 2025, 11:42 UTC≈1,370 views11 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Advertisement

Реклама в канале У меня какое-то время назад появилась реклама в канале. Раньше я жутко боялся это делать. Ощущалось, это испортит мой образ в глазах читателей. Вдруг прорекламирую какую-то фигню. Отвечать потом за рекомендацию. С другой стороны приятно, что к тебе приходят за рекламой. А деньги можно потратить на какие-то радости для себя. А радость от канала повышает желание создавать контент. Хотелось как-то н

11

28 Sept 2025, 14:45 UTC≈1,310 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Подкаст #3 Забыл анонсировать во время публикации, так что если вы пропустили, смотрите третий выпуск подкаста. Говорим про чувство одиночества у фаундеров, как иногда все бесит и как это трансформировать в развитие команды. Ну и еще кое о чем.

11🔥4

17 Sept 2025, 19:40 UTC≈1,560 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ещё один промпт 2 часа ночи. Все вокруг спят. В темной комнате за ноутбуком сидит человек и увлеченно стучит по клавиатуре. В 2025 году сложно предсказать, что он делает: играет или вайбкодит. Чем вайбкодинг так похож на игры? 1. Случайная награда ИИ удивляет. То полная фигня, то «магия». Никогда не знаешь, что будет в итоге запроса. Еще один промпт и все заработает. Я в тебя верю. В играх это называется «эффект

29🔥62👏2💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dailybro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,142,395 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Лабецкий практикует:” (@dailybro), 2,104 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dailybro.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.