Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Stay Hungry in true passion 🥷

Channel

Stay Hungry in true passion 🥷

@Stayhungryteam

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,602subscribers

-160 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001352700247
TypeChannel
Username@Stayhungryteam
DescriptionПривет, я Аня Бичевская, человек оркестр, немного философ и антрополог, помогаю людям искать смысл, быть живыми и устойчивыми в эпоху AI, постправды и одиночеств. И искать своих. @annabichevskaya https://4humanity.community
Created7 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Stayhungryteam

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,6028,7868,6945 August 2026 — 8,762 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,763 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,763 subscribers8 August 2026 — 8,786 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,772 subscribers15 August 2026 — 8,769 subscribers18 August 2026 — 8,759 subscribers21 August 2026 — 8,747 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,743 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,723 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,725 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,724 subscribers6 September 2026 — 8,698 subscribers11 September 2026 — 8,674 subscribers15 September 2026 — 8,670 subscribers19 September 2026 — 8,668 subscribers29 September 2026 — 8,636 subscribers6 October 2026 — 8,643 subscribers13 October 2026 — 8,646 subscribers16 October 2026 — 8,662 subscribers19 October 2026 — 8,657 subscribers22 October 2026 — 8,650 subscribers25 October 2026 — 8,646 subscribers29 October 2026 — 8,636 subscribers1 November 2026 — 8,638 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,615 subscribers7 November 2026 — 8,614 subscribers11 November 2026 — 8,602 subscribers5 August 202611 November 2026
28 measurements spanning 97 days, net -160. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,574–8,814 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 03:068,602-12
7 Nov 2026, 04:498,614-1
4 Nov 2026, 06:458,615-23
1 Nov 2026, 16:018,638+2
29 Oct 2026, 07:498,636-10
25 Oct 2026, 23:158,646-4
22 Oct 2026, 13:108,650-7
19 Oct 2026, 16:368,657-5
16 Oct 2026, 08:158,662+16
13 Oct 2026, 03:098,646+3
6 Oct 2026, 14:418,643+7
29 Sept 2026, 10:018,636-32
19 Sept 2026, 16:378,668-2
15 Sept 2026, 11:408,670-4
11 Sept 2026, 10:218,674-24
6 Sept 2026, 12:208,698-26
1 Sept 2026, 18:548,724-1
29 Aug 2026, 21:558,725+2
26 Aug 2026, 21:038,723-20
24 Aug 2026, 07:368,743first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.92%
avg views ÷ 8,602 subscribers
Avg views / post
767
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held44 (22 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total12,279
Reactions total570
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 13:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,370
Videos
≈78
Links
≈753

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
44s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,144 reactions across 44 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,33962.5%
🔥53825.1%
💯1366.34%
👍301.40%
❤‍🔥221.03%
💔180.84%
👏150.7%
😁130.606%
🤩130.606%
🍓60.28%
🥰40.187%
⚡20.093%
🐳20.093%
💩20.093%
🤗20.093%
💘10.047%
🙈10.047%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,144 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 44 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Stayhungryteam. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 44 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 16 posts held from the last 30 days (37.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 07:51 UTC373 views79 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Вообще то звучит достаточно иронично, что я человек, находящийся в отношениях с одним и тем же мужчиной в течении 30 лет, пишу книгу про одиночество. Изначально я пришла в МИФ с питчем книги про контакт (я же про это), а редактор прочитав мою идею спросила не хочу ли я немного переформатировать направление моего исследования и написать книгу про одиночество. В тот момент мое тело отреагировало мурашками и я поняла,…

❤51🔥19👏5🤗2🥰2

9 Nov 2026, 18:02 UTC669 views24 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

У меня для вас новый анонс - 20 ноября случится следующий философский кружок. В этот раз берем тему одиночества ( теперь в этом канале она будет периодически появляться 😇🧿) Тема неисчерпаемая - в ней есть часть про боль, невидимость, потребность в контакте, социальная изоляция, ощущение отверженности, непонятости и отдельности. И одновременно это процесс, в который можно сознательно себя погрузить, чтобы прожив вс…

❤15🔥7❤‍🔥2

8 Nov 2026, 17:44 UTC758 views70 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Принадлежать группе VS Оставаться собой Принадлежность это не только принятие. Это возможность оставаться узнаваемо собой внутри группы. Исследования групповой идентичности показали, что сильнее всего чувство принадлежности возникает в группах, где есть баланс между тем, чтобы вписываться, и тем, чтобы выделяться. Нас всех частенько качает между желанием вписаться и желанием выделиться. Это абсолютно нормальный пс…

❤44🔥17💯9

6 Nov 2026, 06:58 UTC886 views62 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Агрессия и игнорирование вопроса, как способ не чувствовать. Вторую неделю потихоньку собираю людей, которые готовы поговорить со мной про одиночество. Отдельный тип одиночества - предпринимательский и думаю мужское предпринимательское одиночество отличается от женского предпринимательского ( это гипотеза) Написала вчера в один предпринимательский чатик с запросом на героев и столкнулась с резкой реакцией со сторо…

❤44💯12🔥6

5 Nov 2026, 16:19 UTC992 views46 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Мозгу должно быть немного трудно В детстве мы постоянно делаем то, чего не умеем. Учимся читать, плавать, кататься на велосипеде, играть, танцевать, говорить на другом языке. Во взрослой жизни ситуация переворачивается и мы всё чаще выбираем то, в чём уже компетентны. И именно это, по мнению нейробиолога Томми Вуда, может быть проблемой для мозга. Нейробиолог Томми Вуд говорит, что нейропластичность сохраняется на …

❤27🔥18👍1

4 Nov 2026, 15:36 UTC889 views13 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @moskvichmagPhoto

Москвич после работы: рейвим в Ленинке, смотрим Поллока в Нью-Йорке и «Айтматова» в «Космосе» «Признаюсь, я предпочла бы что-нибудь помелодичнее. Но пришла не за любимым диджеем, а за столкновением библиотечной тишины и рейвового нойза. Получился не столько танцпол, сколько гигантский перформанс: не знаешь, радоваться или раздражаться. И этим он интересен». #москвич_после_работы — это еженедельная хроника жизни наш…

❤13

4 Nov 2026, 15:36 UTC833 views15 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Удивительный эффект диджитального времени - один ролик может вдруг стать вирусным, событие на нем изображенное стать в момент спорным, разделить общественное мнение, а тебя резко закинуть в центр тайфуна, где люди дерутся не на жизнь, а на смерть, и медиа вокруг вдруг стало важно твое мнение. Вообще внутри такой штуки не очень комфортно, это совсем маленькая капля внимания направленная на тебя, а что будет если вним…

❤15

3 Nov 2026, 11:20 UTC818 views41 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @podumalaPhoto

Хочу делать, но не делаю #подкаст #быть_автором Часто мы откладываем свои задумки, потому что считаем, что нам не хватает таланта или времени. Но редко задумываемся, что для воплощения идей нужны особые навыки и внутренние настройки. И о том, как важна среда: вдохновляющие и поддерживающие люди, рядом с которыми хочется создавать Что это за навыки? И как найти таких людей? Обсудили в новом выпуске моего подкаста Вр…

❤24🔥12❤‍🔥5

3 Nov 2026, 11:20 UTC734 views21 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Вышел наш подкаст с Настей Дьяченко о том, как жить из опоры на себя и свои ценности и о том, какие навыки важно развивать на пути творчества (а путь из собственных ценностей по моему мнению и есть путь творчества). Настя круто написала о нашем разговоре, так что даже не буду пытаться тут что-то добавлять, кроме наверное одного. Как я люблю такие "шахматы" жизни, когда случайно знакомишься с человеком на курсе по э…

❤14🔥7

2 Nov 2026, 13:36 UTC773 views27 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @b_gorodPhoto

В Ленинке прошел первый в истории техно-рейв — вечеринку с диджеями в честь Хеллоуина провела издательская группа «Эксмо-АСТ». Интернет тут же разделился на два лагеря: одни остались в восторге от идеи и мечтают попасть на мероприятие в следующий раз, а другие — возмущены выбором площадки. «Большой Город» собрал разные мнения о вечеринке — от исследования антрополога Анны Бичевской о том, что искусство не обязано нр…

🔥14❤7🤩3💩2👏1

2 Nov 2026, 13:36 UTC749 views22 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Забежала, как говорится, на ЛитРейв на пол часика)) и стала серьезным антропологом)) придется теперь соотвествовать)

🤩10👏5🔥5🐳2

2 Nov 2026, 10:09 UTC848 views83 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Начитавшись комментариев под своим ( и некоторыми чужими) постами про ЛитРейв в Ленинке, я решила создать гайд про коммуникации в интернет комментариях на основе анализа более 1200 комментариев про этот кейс. Как люди манипулируют, провоцируют, как ведут или наоборот не ведут диалог, способны ли слышать друг друг друга и как увидеть это в своей речи и вычислить в чужой. Пока сделала исключительно для себя, чтобы им…

🔥69❤11💯3

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @Stayhungryteam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Dumik
@dumik · 21,756
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 September 2026
Olymarkes Daily
@markesdaily · 27,581
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
deep mind 2.0
@mindfulleadersrussia · 20,591
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 September 2026
Daily Reminder
@justakindreminder · 36,340
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 September 2026
Заготовки с Шелушей
@zagotovki_welldone · 31,080
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 6 September 2026
Matskevich - brains, love and robots
@Matskevich · 24,983
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
Катерина Ленгольд
@Katerinalengold · 71,125
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 20 August 2026
Соколова наизнанку
@naiznankuo · 59,549
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
The Future Of Work
@thefutureofwork · 21,193
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 26 September 2026
Dasha’s notes | люди и смыслы
@technohumanist · 38,355
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 1 September 2026
Полина Мальцева
@polina_education · 125,125
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Stay Hungry in true passion 🥷” (@Stayhungryteam), 8,602 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Stayhungryteam.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.