Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Во-первых, это красиво!

@hellobeautygirl

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,715subscribers

-33 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001203922071
TypeChannel
Username@hellobeautygirl
DescriptionАвтор канала — Катерина Минкевич. Пишу о PR, маркетинге и самых модных проектах. Пасхальная коллекция доступна https://influence-you.ru/catalog/tproduct/925074541-258649961692-set-shapochek-dlya-pashalnih-yaits-shpus Связь @MinkevichKatya
Created1 August 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/hellobeautygirl

Growth

13,71513,74813,731.56 August 2026 — 13,748 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,748 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,747 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,743 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,739 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,731 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,725 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,727 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,722 subscribers15 August 2026 — 13,715 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net -33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,710–13,753 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 02:2613,715-7
13 Aug 2026, 18:1513,722-5
12 Aug 2026, 13:4513,727+2
11 Aug 2026, 10:4313,725-6
10 Aug 2026, 10:4213,731-8
9 Aug 2026, 07:5313,739-4
8 Aug 2026, 09:3713,743-4
7 Aug 2026, 06:3113,747-1
6 Aug 2026, 06:4513,748no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:3813,748first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.66%
avg views ÷ 13,715 subscribers
Avg views / post
776
41 posts measured
Reaction rate
26.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
41
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held41 (5 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total31,833
Reactions total8,540
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
14,100
Videos
1,970
Links
1,920

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 53s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

8,107 reactions across 39 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 99.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8,07299.6%
💔350.432%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,540reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 41 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hellobeautygirl. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 41 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC292 views108 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Во-первых, это красиво! У меня всё просто: вижу имя Андрея Бартенева, ни секунды не думаю. Потому что точно знаю, что увижу там что-то совершенно необыковенное, как эти костюмы-скульптуры, созданные специально для ТОН-ЦЕНТРА. Там представили новый проект — спектакль с распевом «Радость- свадьба с подменой невесты и другими происшествиями». Свадебный ажиотаж проник и в искусство, так что вдвойне интересно посмотреть

108

14 Aug 2026, 12:57 UTC683 views343 reactionsread 15 August 2026

МЫ ТОЖЕ ЭТОГО ОЧЕНЬ ХОТИМ! https://t.me/imnomimalone/37802

343

14 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC696 views276 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @brandforlife

Не могу ответить в комментариях у Кати, которую я уважаю, она отличный пиар-специалист для fashion, поэтому по Кейсу Рози для Эконики напишу тут: 1. Внятные эксперты не говорили о том, что брать международную знаменитость плохо — наоборот. Эта тема была вообще в кругах, оторванных от потребления в этом сегменте. 2. То, что комментарии взяли у людей, которые работали / работают пиар-директорами известных брендов — о

276

14 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC629 views294 reactionsread 15 August 2026

На планете земля есть только один человек, которому я доверяю и считаю сильнейшим специалистом в коммуникации. Подписывайтесь на Анну Подпрятову! Приказываю!

294

14 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC640 views201 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Если вы хотели увидеть российскую журналистику в деле. Вот разобрали горячий кейс и показали, что сила зарубежного бренда имеет значение даже в подписи экспертов. Когда даже комментарии берут у людей, которые экс-Prada, Louis Vuitton и далее через запятую. А вы задаётесь вопросом, зачем привлекают зарубежных моделей и других героев. Чтобы вы же потом о них и хотели написать. Можно кричать во весь голос, почему не б

201

14 Aug 2026, 10:27 UTC492 views12 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Редко, но метко ИИ может выдавать такие классные истории. Вот такая съёмка могла бы быть у новоиспечённых мужа и жены Криштиану Роналду и Джорджины Родригес. Идея и реализация принадлежат креативному дому House of Z. Что сказать, ребята отработали новость на 10 из 10. Ну и оригинальная идея для кадров молодожёнов, если вам наскучила классическая съёмка на природе или в городе. 📷 House of Z

7💔5

14 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC505 views9 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Не могу нарадоваться тому, что российский глянец в лице Grazia продолжает держать планку по съёмкам. Августовский выпуск с актрисой Ольгой Лерман на обложке — красиво! 📷 Варвара Фельдман

9

13 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC283 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Подружка, не соглашусь. Скорость, это когда у тебя процесс согласования на самом высоком уровне доверия. Скорость это еще про людей и их не только вовлеченность, но и веру в идею, продукт и принцип коммуникации. Я сама бываю тяну время, потому что не верю в результаты, а когда пазл складывается у меня скорость «не успели моргнуть». https://t.me/stasyboooo/1684

1

13 Aug 2026, 12:58 UTC371 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026

https://t.me/annakuzmina_mood/2612 Горжусь, землячка! ❤️

8

13 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC638 views260 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Увидела я тут пост в канале «Цена красоты» о коллаборациях в индустрии красоты. Как человек, который работает с этим каждый — без преувеличения — день, решила поделиться своим видением ситуации. В месяц мы запускаем по 10 коллабораций косметических брендов с ресторанами. Это один из лучших инструментов, чтобы быстро сформировать узнаваемость бренда или привлечь внимание к продукту. Продукт в подарок — это возможнос

260

13 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC743 views365 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Как ваша админка видит себя после покупки в КМ20 леопардовой кепки 🐆

365

13 Aug 2026, 06:06 UTC≈2,460 views232 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Photo

Вчера в столице прошёл самый модный слёт. Точкой сбора был любимый КМ20. В очереди за архивными вещами были замечены братья Хованские, Дашка Монашка, диджей D'maselle, Настя Полетаева и другие светские герои. Лично мы с Булавкой охотились за Moschino и Duran Lantink. Уйти я могла если и не с пустыми руками, то точно в леопардовой кепке.

231💔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @hellobeautygirl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 27,610 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Журнал «Москвичка»
@moskvichka_mag · 101,991
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Во-первых, это красиво!” (@hellobeautygirl), 13,715 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hellobeautygirl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.