Channel
@ftsec
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
19,406subscribers
-22 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001325886015 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ftsec |
| Description | Главное про интернет, технологии, медиа, ритейл и финтех из российских и международных источников. За 42 секунды. По рекламе – @fortytwosec Регистрация в перечне РКН – clck.ru/3G3U2m |
| Created | 12 May 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ftsec |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 19,406 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 19,409 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 19,414 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 19,415 | -8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:41 | 19,423 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 19,424 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 19,426 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 19,428 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 19,428 | first reading |
87 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 87 (4 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 245,960 |
| Reactions total | 665 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 23:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
515 reactions across 68 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 412 | 80.0% | |
| 👎 | 103 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 87 of the 87 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 665reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 87 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ftsec. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 87 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
FT: Amazon выявила случаи, когда ИИ приводил к неконтролируемым расходам на IT-проекты – Выявлены «катастрофически дорогостоящие» случаи перерасхода средств – Причиной стали ошибки при внедрении ИИ и отсутствие контроля – Использование моделей для кода создало «незапланированные» расходы – В одном из проектов Amazon подобные расходы составили $1,8 млн – Перерасход при работе над проектом составил 860% от общего бюдж…
👍6
Bloomberg: Roblox сообщил о снижении количества активных пользователей – Показатель DAU игровой платформы Roblox за квартал снизился – DAU за квартал составил 123 млн, аналитики ждали 128,7 млн – Объем бронирований, показывающий продажи, составил $1,56 млрд – Roblox заявил, что наблюдает рост числа новых популярных игр – Сейчас на Roblox приходится около 4% мирового игрового дохода – В этом году акции игровой платфо…
👍3
FT: Revolut сокращает доступ к WeWork для премиум-клиентов из-за повышения цен – Премиум-клиенты Revolut лишились доступа к ряду офисов WeWork – Доступ потерян к самым востребованным европейским офисам – Речь про WeWork в Париже, Брюсселе, Милане, Лондоне, Праге и др. – Указано, что заранее об изменениях клиентов не уведомляли – WeWork попытался взимать с Revolut доп. плату за услуги для клиентов – Однако Revolut от…
👍6👎1
Reuters: Квартальная прибыль Sony превзошла ожидания благодаря игровому бизнесу – Японская компания Sony повысила прогноз прибыли на весь год – По итогам прошедшего квартала прибыль выросла на 40% – Компанию хвалили за переориентацию на сферу развлечений – Однако инвесторов беспокоит рост цен на чипы памяти и др. – Sony заявила, что обеспечила достаточные поставки чипов на год – Операц. прибыль Sony за прошлый кварт…
👍4
Bloomberg: Китайская модель Kimi от Moonshot обучалась на 20 тыс. чипах Nvidia – Чипы Nvidia китайскому стартапу Moonshot предоставила Alibaba – Для обучения Kimi использовали около 20 тыс. чипов Nvidia – Зависимость китайских разработчиков ИИ от Nvidia сохраняется – Kimi K3 по ряду показателей не уступает моделям OpenAI и др. – Alibaba является одним из крупнейших инвесторов для Moonshot – Однако Alibaba и Moonshot…
👍5
FT: Moonshot AI стремится получить одобрение властей Китая для выхода на фондовый рынок – Китайский стартап Moonshot AI обновил свою корп. структуру – Стартап привлек несколько крупных госинвесторов и др. – Moonshot AI пытается получить одобрение властей на свое IPO – IPO нужно, чтобы профинансировать новые разработки и др. – Не исключено, что IPO потребует нового изменения структуры – Официально сроки выхода Moonsh…
👍4
The Information: Проект Microsoft по созданию собственного ИИ-чипа подает признаки жизни после медленного старта – В след. году Microsoft хочет значительно увеличить производство чипов – Microsoft хочет убедить крупных клиентов использовать новые чипы – Внедрение чипов текущего поколения Maia 200 идет весьма медленно – Microsoft планирует представить свой новый чип Maia 300 осенью – Компания хочет, чтобы TSMC увелич…
👍4
Habr: Сервис для проверки видимости компаний в нейросетях ГЕОранк изучил, как системно влиять на попадание в рекомендации ИИ – В классическом поиске логика давно знакома: позиции, показы, клики и др. – Более высокие позиции в выдаче приносят бизнесу больше трафика и др. – В нейросетях процесс поиска и ответа для пользователя выглядит совсем иначе – Пользователь пишет длинный вопрос и получает ответ на несколько абза…
👎9👍3
Ведомости: Выручка Yandex B2B Tech за H1 2026 выросла на 32%, составив 28,9 млрд руб. – Выручка Яндекс 360 – 11,6 млрд, Yandex Cloud – 16,7 млрд руб. (+42 и 30%) – Офисное направление Yandex B2B Tech растет быстрее облачного – Однако Yandex Cloud приносит Yandex B2B Tech более половины выручки – Общая скорр. EBITDA за H1 2026 составила 6,4 млрд руб. (+45%) – MAU виртуального офиса Яндекс 360 вырос на 26%, составив 1…
👍7👎3
Reuters: Qualcomm будет поставлять BMW чипы для будущих автомобильных платформ – Qualcomm подписала долгосрочное соглашение на поставку чипов – Чипы нужны для передовых систем помощи водителю и др. – Qualcomm будет поставлять чипы BMW в течение след. десятилетия – Соглашение заключено на фоне усиления конкуренции на рынке – Сделка включает решения Qualcomm Snapdragon Digital Chassis и др. – Чипы Qualcomm будут аппар…
👍4
Forbes: Соцсеть Looky запустит собственный мессенджер – Российская соцсеть Looky планирует создать собственный мессенджер – В ближайшее время мессенджер появится в магазинах приложений – Решение принято после ухода с рынка ряда зарубежных сервисов и др. – Сказалось также удаление популярных российских приложений – Looky инвестирует в разработку мессенджера и маркетинговое промо – Сейчас функциональность работает уже…
👎8👍2
Reuters: Бразильская платежная система Pix набирает популярность во всем мире – Бразильская Pix является одной из самых успешных платежных систем – Система стала горячей точкой между властями Бразилии и США – США ограждают американские фирмы от растущей популярности Pix – Pix позволяет переводить средства в режиме реального времени – Переводы способны миновать большую часть традиционной цепочки – Компании получают в…
👍23
Showing the 12 most recent of 87 posts we hold for @ftsec. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 121,387 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“42 секунды” (@ftsec), 19,406 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ftsec.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.