Предприниматель, визионер, отец 5-ых. Создал миллиардные компании в рублях (Нетология и Фоксфорд). Ращу единорогов в долларах.
Контакт менеджера: @collaboration_spiridonov
Created
24 February 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 52 days, net +4,197. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 62,231–67,688 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 14:19
67,058
+234
19 Sept 2026, 11:42
66,824
+117
17 Sept 2026, 03:41
66,707
+85
15 Sept 2026, 02:16
66,622
+79
13 Sept 2026, 10:19
66,543
+220
11 Sept 2026, 12:55
66,323
+133
8 Sept 2026, 18:17
66,190
+128
5 Sept 2026, 11:20
66,062
+68
3 Sept 2026, 15:17
65,994
+1
2 Sept 2026, 09:07
65,993
-12
1 Sept 2026, 06:38
66,005
-82
31 Aug 2026, 04:25
66,087
-39
30 Aug 2026, 05:14
66,126
+139
29 Aug 2026, 04:38
65,987
+215
28 Aug 2026, 07:45
65,772
+385
27 Aug 2026, 05:48
65,387
+604
26 Aug 2026, 02:12
64,783
+361
25 Aug 2026, 00:59
64,422
+117
23 Aug 2026, 16:17
64,305
+92
22 Aug 2026, 03:34
64,213
first reading
Engagement
108 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 110 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.8%
avg views ÷ 67,058 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,900
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
50
of 108 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held
108 (24 July 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total
394,850
Reactions total
9,287
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Sept 2026, 14:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,530
Videos
≈145
Links
≈1,450
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 13s
Average length
37s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
19,822 reactions across 104 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
5,446
27.5%
👍
5,317
26.8%
❤
4,716
23.8%
😁
3,590
18.1%
😢
508
2.56%
💔
245
1.24%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 108 of the 108 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20,561 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 108 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
437
across the posts below
Posts paid on
52
of 108 we hold a reading for · 48%
Most on one post
114
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mspiridonov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 108 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 29 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
6.48%
7 of 108 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
7,040
over 7 measured posts
Median views · rest
7,620
over 101 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2Vtzqufbz8T
1
31 August 2026
31 August 2026
2VtzqwEWzfn
1
9 September 2026
9 September 2026
3apb1QrvkeffTh1dHuFNAPdoCfU5NR1Z25UChbhD3Gx4C
1
4 August 2026
4 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 108 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 29 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Недавно моя младшая дочь окончила университет в Германии. Графический дизайн, диплом на руках, портфолио готово – а постоянную работу найти не может уже несколько месяцев.
И дело не в том, что она плохой дизайнер (по мне – классный, хотя как отец я не объективен). Дело в том, что рынок начинающих дизайнеров сейчас – это мясорубка. Как и рынки начинающих редакторов, аналитиков, юристов и т. п. Компании, которые раньш…
Цукерберга наконец-то посетила муза.
Новое приложение Muse от Meta мгновенно стало хитом. Оно взлетело на первую строчку американского App Store, собрав больше 3,4 миллиона скачиваний и подвинув даже ChatGPT. На этом хайпе акции компании с начала месяца выросли аж на 30%.
Muse – это ИИ-агент, который бронирует поездки, разгребает почту, делает покупки и вообще расправляется с бытовой рутиной за хозяина. Командовать…
Вчера сходил на спектакль “Вдовы” местного русскоязычного театра. Это абсурдистская комедия по пьесе Славомира Мрожека.
Честно сказать, до первых минут действия, настроен был скептически. Тем сильнее было впечатление. Ребята играли фактически профессионально. Режиссура, сценография – всё на месте и на отличном уровне.
Пхукет гигантскими шагами становится “альтернативной Москвой” со своими ресторанами, клубами, школ…
Чтобы построить бизнес на миллиарды, больше не нужна корпорация. Хватит одного человека.
В новом выпуске “Визионеров” мы с Ароном Закрией говорим о солопренёрах – людях, которые ведут дело без штата и многоэтажной управленческой пирамиды. Арон знает тему не понаслышке: он сваял ИИ-сервис буквально за несколько часов, а через пять дней после запуска продал его за миллион рублей (до миллиардов пока далековато, но темп…
Спать на работе можно. Главное – чтобы все видели.
Илон Маск три года подряд жил на заводах Tesla. В буквальном смысле – по его собственному признанию, тогда это было его основным местом жительства. Спал то на диване, то в палатке на крыше, а то и вовсе на полу под своим столом. Причём стол этот стоял прямо в цеху, у всех на виду. И это не случайность.
Ночевал он там намеренно – чтобы каждая пересменка заставала бо…
#реклама
Держать часть команды на самозанятости удобно и законно. Ровно до тех пор, пока к вам не нагрянет выездная проверка.
Сам по себе договор с таким исполнителем налоговую не смущает. Подозрения у инспекторов вызывают вещи, которые многим кажутся мелочами. Скажем, человек годами берёт заказы только у вас и получает оплату дважды в месяц, аккурат в дни, когда зарплату выдают штату. Да ещё и в договоре мелькают …
Безумный Маск и все-все-все.
Если хочется за минуту прочувствовать драйв и хаос гонки за AGI, посмотрите этот ролик – эдакую “Дорогу ярости” в исполнении техномиллиардеров. Тут вам и наглядная расстановка сил, и точная иллюстрация характеров главных игроков, и увлекательный квест с поиском пасхалок.
Для разгона – пара моих находок. Цукерберг очухивается от метавселенной с криком “Упс, не тот тренд!” и судорожно дог…
Друзья, лимит на сторис в моём канале усох до пары штук в день, а мне всегда есть что вам показать.
Если вы счастливый обладатель Telegram Premium, давайте восстановим справедливость и прокачаем канал бустами: https://t.me/mspiridonov?boost
Клуб да не тот.
Я уже не раз писал, что молодёжь охладевает к алкоголю. Во многих странах мира бары, рестораны и ночные клубы отмечают снижение посещаемости и закрываются один за другим.
Так вот, теперь выяснилось, куда переместился весь этот поток. В фитнес-клубы и прочие спортзалы. И если вы думаете, что молодые люди идут туда только ради сжигания калорий, то это лишь половина правды. Они устраивают там вечеринки…
❤86🔥55😁45👍38😢2
Showing the 12 most recent of 108 posts we hold for @mspiridonov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@mspiridonov edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
17 September 2026
Most recent edit
17 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 42 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Телеграмма от Максима Юрина @yumaks · 42,740 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 29 August 2026
Гуринович делится! @gurinovich_shares · 29,434 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 September 2026
Александр Кравцов | Следующий уровень @akravtsovcom · 33,179 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
Радислав Гандапас @radislavgandapascom · 53,031 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
Тёмная сторона / Темнографика @temno · 79,668 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 August 2026
Mikhail Tokovinin @mtokovinin · 108,209 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 August 2026
Маргулан Сейсембай @MargulanSeissembai · 209,546 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 August 2026
Алекс Яновский @AlexYanovsky · 20,771 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 September 2026
Итак, это Панов @itakblet · 25,172 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 September 2026
Мастриды @mustreads · 45,141 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
Упал, поднялся — блог Славы Рюмина @ruminblog · 63,983 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
Александр Высоцкий @alexander_visotsky · 36,850 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 1 September 2026
Oleg Torbosov @TorbosovLife · 107,412 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
Dumik @dumik · 22,156 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 September 2026
Чирков Максим @maxchirtop · 49,529 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 August 2026
Михаил Дашкиев @mikhaildashkiev · 43,937 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
Стартап дня. Александр Горный. @startupoftheday · 60,633 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
Sokolovskiy @sokolay · 109,366 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 August 2026
Matskevich - brains, love and robots @Matskevich · 25,245 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
состояние потока @optimalexperience · 20,706 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 September 2026
Максонская ложа (Канал) @nomarketolog · 26,764 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 September 2026
Индекс дятла @dindex · 22,106 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 September 2026
Регулярный менеджмент для руководителей (Евгений Севастьянов) @regularmanagement · 22,896 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
Павел Гительман @potok_gitelman · 38,562 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 130 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Максим Спиридонов” (@mspiridonov), 67,058 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mspiridonov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
