11월 5일 출근길 팟캐스트 — 민주당, 트럼프 일가·가상자산 자금관계 조사 계획…비트코인 8만달러 재돌파 미 민주당의 조사 계획이 정책 불확실성을 키운 가운데 시장은 비트코인 8만달러 재돌파와 대규모 숏 청산으로 강한 반등을 나타냈다. 파생상품과 스테이블코인 거래가 급증해 상승 추격과 위험 관리가 동시에 강화된 흐름이다. #토큰포스트 #출근길브리핑 🔗 토큰포스트 기사 원문

Channel
토큰포스트 공식 채널
@tokenpost_kr
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,936subscribers
-376 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001584728369 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tokenpost_kr |
| Created | 24 August 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tokenpost_kr |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 17:45 | 5,936 | -16 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 22:39 | 5,952 | -5 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 23:06 | 5,957 | -5 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 22:10 | 5,962 | -9 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 12:18 | 5,971 | -15 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 02:38 | 5,986 | -4 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 07:05 | 5,990 | -14 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 14:58 | 6,004 | -7 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 18:56 | 6,011 | -8 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 03:37 | 6,019 | -39 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 23:42 | 6,058 | -117 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 09:59 | 6,175 | -31 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:37 | 6,206 | -11 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 20:41 | 6,217 | -8 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 08:57 | 6,225 | -11 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 02:16 | 6,236 | -9 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 6,245 | -13 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:52 | 6,258 | -13 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:38 | 6,271 | -6 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 6,277 | first reading |
Engagement
213 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.445%
- avg views ÷ 5,936 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 26.4
- 39 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 39
- of 213 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 213 (6 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,031 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 01:08 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😱 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 213 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 213 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 39 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
[이더 옵션 데일리] 미결제약정 64억5733만 달러…5000달러 콜옵션 거래량 선두 이더리움 옵션 미결제약정은 64억5733만 달러로 전일 대비 14% 증가했고, 24시간 거래량은 22억4549만 달러로 집계됐다. 중기 포지션과 단기 거래 모두 콜옵션이 우세한 가운데, 거래량에서는 콜 쏠림이 상대적으로 약했다. #이더옵션데일리 #이더리움 #콜옵션 #미결제약정 #토큰포스트 🔗 토큰포스트 기사 원문
[이더 옵션 데일리] 미결제약정 64억5733만 달러…5000달러 콜옵션 거래량 선두 이더리움 옵션 미결제약정은 64억5733만 달러로 전일 대비 14% 증가했고, 24시간 거래량은 22억4549만 달러로 집계됐다. 중기 포지션과 단기 거래 모두 콜옵션이 우세한 가운데, 거래량에서는 콜 쏠림이 상대적으로 약했다. #이더옵션데일리 #이더리움 #콜옵션 #미결제약정 #토큰포스트 🔗 토큰포스트 기사 원문
GPT-6.1 Sol, DevRev 기업 지원 도구에 적용 DevRev는 직원과 고객의 요청을 처리하는 Computer와 Operator에 GPT-6.1 Sol을 적용했다. 두 제품은 GPT-6 Astra 등 다른 모델과 기업 데이터·권한 제어 환경도 함께 사용한다. #오픈AI #GPT-6.1Sol #DevRev #ai에이전트 🔗 토큰포스트 기사 원문
1000달러 주문 스프레드·슬리피지, 엔비디아 토큰 가격 차 웃돌아 탈로스 분석에서는 거래 수수료를 제외하고도 1000달러 주문의 평균 스프레드와 슬리피지가 관측된 가격 차를 넘어섰다. Bitquery가 배당 재투자 효과를 보정해 집계한 토큰 간 일간 가격 차의 중간값은 0.08~0.12%였다. #엔비디아 #주식토큰 #토큰화주식 #슬리피지 #xStocks 🔗 토큰포스트 기사 원문
오픈AI, 리눅스 취약점 1724건 재현…948건 권한 상승 확인 오픈AI가 리눅스 커널 취약점 후보 2308건 가운데 1724건을 실험 환경에서 재현했다. 변형 분석을 거쳐 서로 다른 로컬 권한 상승 취약점 948건을 집계했다. #오픈AI #리눅스 #사이버보안 #AI보안 🔗 토큰포스트 기사 원문
메이저 코인, 올해 플러스 마감할까…체인링크 34% 가장 높아 절반을 넘긴 종목이 없습니다. 어제보다 가장 크게 움직인 건 솔라나(▲9%p)입니다. - 체인링크(LINK) 34% - 비트코인(BTC) 23% - 솔라나(SOL) 19% 📱 실시간 확률 보기 · ▶ 유튜브 라이브 보기 #예측시장 #비트코인 #이더리움 #XRP #토큰포스트
[비트 옵션 데일리] 미결제약정 343억3515만 달러…8만1000달러 콜옵션 거래량 선두 비트코인 옵션 미결제약정은 343억3515만 달러로 전일 대비 11% 증가했고, 거래량은 89억9020만 달러로 집계됐다. 중기 포지션과 단기 거래 모두 콜옵션이 우세한 가운데, 11월 13일 만기 8만1000달러 콜옵션이 거래량 선두에 올랐다. #비트옵션데일리 #비트코인옵션 #미결제약정 #콜옵션우세 #토큰포스트 🔗 토큰포스트 기사 원문
AWS 운영 시험 모델 실패 80%는 추론 오류로 분류됐다 CloudOpsBench 개발팀은 시험 모델들의 AWS 운영 과제 실패 원인을 분석했다. 공식 리더보드에서 가장 높은 성공률은 Claude Fable 5.1(max)·Claude Code 조합의 60.6%였다. #ai에이전트 #클라우드운영 #AWS #벤치마크 #CloudOpsBench 🔗 토큰포스트 기사 원문
피그마 3분기 매출 약 43% 증가에도 시간외 주가 7% 하락 매출과 조정 주당순이익이 예상치를 웃돌았다. 피그마는 가격을 유지한 채 고객에게 제공하는 AI 크레딧을 늘렸다. #피그마 #3분기실적 #AI크레딧 #미국증시 🔗 토큰포스트 기사 원문
퀄컴, 2027회계연도 1분기 두 고객사에 맞춤형 칩 출하 계획 퀄컴은 2027회계연도 1분기 매출 전망에 대형 클라우드 고객사 두 곳을 위한 맞춤형 칩 출하 시작을 반영했다. 두 고객사 중 한 곳은 아마존웹서비스(AWS)다. #퀄컴 #맞춤형칩 #데이터센터 #AWS #AI추론 🔗 토큰포스트 기사 원문
11월 5일 아침 지금 많이 본 기사 - 리플, RLUSD 확대에도 XRP 중심 전략…"유동성·활용도… - 트럼프, 공화당 중간선거 패배 뒤 공개 일정 모두 취소 보도 - 미 민주당 양원 승리 계기로 이스라엘 야권 네타냐후 사퇴 요구 - 리플(XRP) 809만9291.67개 그대로, 탑밸류 공개 전… - 암호화폐 지지 하이젠가 의원, 개표 95%서 7000표 넘게… 지금 많이 본 쇼츠 - [영상 카드뉴스] 바이낸스 해킹이 던진 비트코인 보관… 696회 - 비트코인과 금, 15분 뒤 오를까 내릴까? 👀 492회 - 그때 엔비디아를 샀더라면? 280회 - 그때 엑스알피(리플)를 샀더라면? 257회 - SK하이닉스 종가 vs 온체인, 밤새 얼마나 벌어졌나… 193회 🏠 토큰포스트 · ▶ 유튜브 라이브 보기 #비트코인 #시황 #쇼츠 #토큰포스
Showing the 12 most recent of 213 posts we hold for @tokenpost_kr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@toncoin_kr · 22,926
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 September 2026
@blockmedia · 32,899
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
@coinkcgchannel · 15,339
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 October 2026
@godmulzoo · 22,634
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“토큰포스트 공식 채널” (@tokenpost_kr), 5,936 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tokenpost_kr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.