Channel
@face_east
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
75subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004408918318 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @face_east |
| Created | 17 June 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/face_east |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 75 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:39 | 75 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (17 June 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 11,330 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 21:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
우리가 현재 쓰는 생성형 AI를 가능하게 만든 Attention Is All You Need라고 하는 논문의 공동저자이자 니어 프로토콜의 공동창립자인 일리야 폴로수킨과 인터뷰를 했습니다. AI 시대에 일리야는 자녀 교육을 어떻게 시킬 계획인지, 오픈소스 vs 클로즈드 소스의 대결, AI에게 대체되지 않을 일, 그리고 크립토와 AI에 모두 몸 담고 있는 사람으로써 어떤 생각을 가지고 있는지 들어볼 수 있는 아주 귀한 자리였습니다. 지금 유튜브에서 시청하세요: https://youtu.be/CUAnFJY4XjQ
한국의 레버리지가 절정에 달했을 때 심판을 내리는 이가 있었으니 그의 이름은 케네스 그리핀이라고 한다. 오늘은 그가 우리의 돈을 어떻게 빼앗아갔는지 이야기해보는 시간을 가져갔습니다. 유튜브에서 시청하세요: https://youtu.be/DH1Awsf5N7o
Video, posted without a caption
AI 시대는 이미 왔습니다. 노답 삼형제가 나름 AI 시대에서 어떻게 살아남아야 하는지 본인들의 생각을 풀어봤습니다. 유튜브에서 시청하세요: https://youtu.be/fCrQfMyXHCs
절대로 빡빡이를 믿어선 안됩니다. 이번 에피소드에서는 최근에 있었던 밈코인 펌핑에 대한 생각들과 하이닉스 고점 시그널 등에 대해서 이야기 해봤습니다. 유튜브에서 시청하세요: https://youtu.be/drIQROVj76s
두번째 에피소드는 19금입니다. 유튜브에서 지금 바로 시청하세요: https://youtu.be/zYx0nxYX0SU
face 팟캐스트 첫 에피소드가 공개되었습니다! 다 포기하고 하이닉스 풀매수 하신 분, 스테이블코인은 세계정부가 우리를 조종하려고 하는 기술이라고 하는 분, 비트코인은 시총 1위 자리를 내려놔야 한다고 하는 분, 세 명이 모여서 크립토와 21세기 금융에 대해서 떠들어봤습니다. 유튜브에서 시청하세요: https://youtu.be/S7NANB28uBQ
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @face_east. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 64,140 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“face” (@face_east), 75 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/face_east.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.