Channel
@jerryalpha
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,425subscribers
-231 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001651649593 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jerryalpha |
| Created | 17 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jerryalpha |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 6,425 | -61 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:38 | 6,486 | -107 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:19 | 6,593 | -50 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:06 | 6,643 | -13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 6,656 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:09 | 6,656 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (11 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,515 |
| Reactions total | 33 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
54 reactions across 24 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 28 | 51.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 16 | 29.6% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 18.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💠 Botanika: DePIN + RWA + AI 기반 분산형 인프라 프로젝트 Botanika는 DePIN, RWA, AI의 교집합 영역에서 작동하는 신규 프로젝트로 최근 $1.5M 규모의 시드 라운드 투자를 성공적으로 마감함 ✔️ 투자 유치 및 팀 배경 🟢 주요 투자 기관 CRIT Ventures, Baboon Ventures, Marble X, Daedalus Angels 등 참여 🟢 핵심 엔젤 투자자 Fez & Shayn (Voltr), Jongchan (Trepa), Johannes Jäger (Metrix Capital), Soju (@0xSoju), Cristian (@kiddoq) 등 참여 🟢 디파이 빌더들의 참여 Ranger Finance 같은 디파이 빌더들이 엔젤로 참여함 인프라 프로젝트에 디파이 빌더가 들어온 것은 흔치…
❤1❤🔥1👍1
FOMO 관련 비난이 많네요. FOMO는 밈코인 트레이딩 플랫폼이고 파운더가 한국인입니다. 위 이미지는 인게이지먼트 파밍 없고, KOL딜 없다고 하지만 뒤에선 댓글당 $0.15를 준다는 내용 + 최근 이슈인 $30K를 주고 탑급 밈코인 트레이더를 영입 하고 있다는 이슈 등등.. 아무튼 비난이 많은데 유사 플랫폼인 펌프펀의 견제인지 아니면 진짜 잡음인지 알 수 없네요. #FOMO
❤🔥1👍1
https://n.news.naver.com/article/015/0005319567 이재명 대통령이 11일 국무회의에서 “빚을 져서 못 갚는 건 채무자의 잘못인데, 그걸 고려하지 못하고 과도하게 돈을 빌려준 채권자 책임도 있다는 게 최근의 일반적 입장”이라고 밝혔다. “대출업자는 일정 부분 채무가 이행 불능 상태가 될 것을 감안해 비용을 사전 처리하지 않느냐”며 “(빚을) 못 갚은 경우를 청산하는 건 원래 예정된 것”이라고 했다. 이 대통령은 “결국 신용회복위원회든 금융기관, 대출기관이 스스로 청산해야 한다”고 해결책을 제시하며 “더 적극적으로 해달라”고 당부했다. 이재명 대통령님 집 사신 분은 대박이네요. 대통령님께서 빌려준 돈 갚지 않아도 본인 책임이랍니다.
❤🔥1👍1
⚡️⚡️⚡️ 파키스탄 “미국과 이란이 합의에 가까워진 것으로 보인다.” 파키스탄 국방장관이 이슬라마바드에 도착해 기자들과 만나 "미국과 이란이 모종의 합의에 근접한 신호가 포착되고 있다"고 밝힘.
❤🔥1👍1
블랙록, 비트코인 ETF<>현물 교환 기준 낮춰 출처 기존 2500만불에서 100만불로
❤🔥1👍1
정부안에 유예는 없었다…2027년 코인 과세, 무엇을 준비해야 할까[엠블록레터] 정부는 2026년 세제개편안을 통해 가상자산 과세를 2027년 1월 1일부터 시행하며, 유예 조치는 없음을 밝혔습니다. 현재 법에 따라 가상자산을 팔거나 교환해 얻은 이익, 그리고 다른 사람이나 사업자에게 빌려주고 받은 대가도 과세 대상이며, 비트코인을 이더리움 등으로 교환하는 경우에도 거래 시점의 평가이익이 소득으로 인정됩니다. 연간 소득은 양도·교환 대가와 대여 대가를 합산한 후 취득가격과 필요경비를 공제한 뒤 기본공제 250만원을 적용하고, 나머지 금액에 대해 소득세 20%와 지방소득세 2%를 포함한 총 세율 22%를 부과합니다. 출처 #국내
❤2👍1
“손실 봤는데 세금 내라?”…디지털자산 과세, 손실 이월공제 혜택 없다.
❤1👍1
진짜 코베에서 이제 안간거 찾기가 더 어려운 지경에왔군요
❤1👍1
🟢 개인적으로 생각하는 업비트의 원화상장 빈도 증가 ✅ 왜 자주 상장하나? 1️⃣ 네이버 합병 -두나무와 네이버의 주식교환 일정은 연말로 연기(주총 11월 19일, 효력발생일 12월 31일) -두나무는 3분기~4분기 중 주식교환 일정에 앞서 업비트의 주요 지표를 최대한 끌어올려 체급을 올릴 필요가 있음 2️⃣ 디지털자산 기본법 시행 -최근 정부부처는 디지털자산기본법 시행에 대해 강경한 기조로 움직이고 있음 -디지털자산기본법에서 주로 언급 되는 내용 중 상장심사강화가 손에 꼽히고 있음 -규제 불확실성 + 상장절차 강화 전 거래량 안나오는 올드페어 종목을 대신할 신규페어 상장 노리기 3️⃣ 과세 시행 -마찬가지로 정부는 세제개편안을 통해 27년 1월부 가상자산 과세 시행을 거의 못박은 상태 -이미 거래량이 크게 줄어든 상황이지…
❤1👍1
정체불명 지갑, BTC 40배 숏 1억2600만달러. Lookonchain : 신규 생성 지갑 0xff84가 244만 USDC 예치 후 40배 숏 개설 : 포지션 규모 약 1억2600만 달러, 청산가 6만4888달러 : 의도 불명이나 현재가와 청산가 간격이 좁아 변수로 부상 #BTC #고래
❤1👍1
누군가의 일리있는 의견 지난 불장도 최종 고점은 못보고 80% 수준에서 그침. 그래서 저점도 최종 저점은 못볼거라는 의견 차트는 지금 사람들 중 손실 중인 물량 비율이 이미 FTX 사태 때보다 높고, 2018년 대폭락 때 수준에 거의 근접 👉원문 #BTC
👍2❤🔥1
최근 8개월 한국 주식 시장과 김치 프리미엄 상관관계 그냥 재미로 뽑아본건데 흥미롭네요
❤1👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @jerryalpha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,277,311 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“JerrY Alpha” (@jerryalpha), 6,425 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jerryalpha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.