Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

웹3 & AI 에이전트 광기 연구실

@ryotmadness

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,941subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002307869453
TypeChannel
Username@ryotmadness
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ryotmadness

Growth

1,9411,9501,945.56 August 2026 — 1,949 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,950 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,949 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,941 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,940–1,951 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 05:221,941-8
9 Aug 2026, 13:011,949-1
6 Aug 2026, 15:201,950+1
6 Aug 2026, 11:471,949first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.3%
avg views ÷ 1,941 subscribers
Avg views / post
258
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.572%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 25 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held25 (29 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total6,460
Reactions total6
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
583.3%
👍116.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC174 viewsread 7 August 2026

요즘 본 짤 중에서 가장 공감대가 가는 짤…

7 Aug 2026, 04:34 UTC210 viewsread 7 August 2026

돈을 벌어서 정당하게 바꾸는 것이니 사실 자본주의 사회에서 당연한 것 이지만 정말 짜증나는군요 솔라나 살려내라 이새키들아

7 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTC182 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @BChoSNPhoto

펌프펀, 625만불치 SOL 판매 출처

7 Aug 2026, 02:57 UTC220 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

에이…클래리티 법안 여름 이후로 지연

5 Aug 2026, 05:12 UTC290 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

제가 존경해 마지않는 스티브님은 결국 닿지 않는 곳까지 진출해버리는근영 흑흑 양지의 크립토신 스티브

1

5 Aug 2026, 05:11 UTC110 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @catallactic

제가 삼프로 티비에 출연하게 되었습니다. 항상 구독자의 입장이었다가 이렇게 직접 출연하게 되니 감회가 매우 새롭네요. 구독자 300만의 채널에서 무엇을 이야기를 해야 업계에 조금이나마 도움이 될 수 있을까 고민하다가 "과세"이야기를 좀 해봤습니다. 그냥 단순히 "과세 유예해주세요."라는 이야기를 하려는 것이 아니라, 리서치 회사의 대표로써 왜 현재 크립토 과세가 시장의 왜곡을 일으킬 수 있는지, 그리고 이게 왜 더 많은 정부 개입과 규제를 야기할 수 있는지를 이야기 해봤습니다. 1. 현재 정부의 정책 기조와 과세 체계는 서로 상충됩니다. 정부는 법인의 거래소 계좌를 점진적으로 허용하겠다는 방향을 제시하고 있습니다. 이는 분명 업계에는 긍정적인 변화입니다. 저희처럼 벨리데이터를 운영하며 업무 특성상 가상자산을 지속적으로 취득하는 회사들은,

1

2 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC397 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

덕분에인지는 모르겠지만 지캐시는 다른 메이저 애들 6-70퍼씩 빠질 때에도 상당히 이상적인 방어선을 지키는 중 프라이버시는 계속해서 주목을 받을 소재같은데 지캐시는 누가 뭐래도 해당 카테고리의 킹인지라 빠지기 쉽지 않은건가 싶네요

2 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC322 viewsread 7 August 2026

많은 분들이 눈치 못채셨을 수 있지만, 지캐시가 최근에 ironwood 업데이트를 진행했습니다. shielded pool은 밖에서 잔액이나 거래 흐름을 못 보는 대신 supply integrity에 대한 신뢰가 정말 중요합니다. 이번 신규 구조는 기존 Orchard 잔고가 새 pool로 넘어가는 경로를 통해, 과거에 발생했을지 모르는 공급 불일치를 분리하고 확인할 수 있게 설계되었다고 합니다. Ironwood는 Orchard의 Action 구조와 Halo2 proof를 그대로 이어받았지만, 별도 note commitment tree와 별도 pool balance를 가진 새 pool입니다. 특히 이번 업데이트를 통해 지캐시는 지난번 ai가 발견하고 수정한 무한프린팅 버그를 아무도 악용하지 않았다는 사실을 확고히 데이터를 통해 재확인할 수

1 Aug 2026, 13:43 UTC365 viewsread 7 August 2026

AI 문장은 생성하기는 매우 편하지만, 그 특유의 문체 때문에 AI 생성여부를 알아보기가 쉽습니다 (특히 AI를 통해 긴 글을 만들어본 사람들의 경우는 더욱). AI는 문장의 구조 등이 매우 어색합니다. AI 문제가 진짜 거지같은 가장 큰 이유가 뭐냐면, 영어권에서 이미 비판받는 AI 특유의 장황하고 상투적인 문체에 영어식 문장 구조와 번역체까지 사용해버리기 때문입니다. AI가 만든 문구의 대표주자로 여러 케이스를 들 수 있는데, 예를 들어 "그렇기에 내가 오늘 처음 한 일은 A가 아니라 B이다." 라는 식의, 아무도 당연하다고 생각하지 않았고 시키지도 않은 제멋대로의 가정(A)에 대한 자가 반박 (B) 형태가 그 중 하나이고, "생각보다 단단하지 않다" 같은 어울리지 않는 단어의 조합 (대체 누가 생각을 단단하다고 할까?) 혹은 "이 정도

1 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC301 viewsread 7 August 2026

솔라나는 정말 실적도 잘나오고 유즈케이스도 계속 확장되고 월가도 좋아하고 디젠도 좋아하고 사용량도 월렛수도 계속해서 늘어가는 정말 몇 안되는 유용한 체인인데 차트는 정말 레잔도

1 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC248 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @waitstudyPhoto

$SOL 10개월 연속 월봉 음봉

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @ryotmadness. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 392,072 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“웹3 & AI 에이전트 광기 연구실” (@ryotmadness), 1,941 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ryotmadness.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.