Channel
@pannpunch
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,250subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002402400717 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pannpunch |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pannpunch |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 3,250 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 3,251 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:40 | 3,252 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:48 | 3,250 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 3,250 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 25 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (29 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 20,083 |
| Reactions total | 29 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
21 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 16 | 76.2% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 19.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
업비트가 거의 매일 상장 공지를 띄운다. 예전엔 상장이 이벤트였다. 지금은 스케줄이다. 이벤트가 매일 열리면 그건 이벤트가 아니다. 신규 물량이 원화마켓에 꽂히고, 대기하던 원화가 그 물량을 받아준다. 새 돈이 들어오는 게 아니라 있던 돈 마저 빠져 나가는 것이다. 상장빔을 노리고 거래소에 돈을 깔아두는 전략은 진작에 수명이 끝났다. 실탄을 대기시켜 놓을수록 유동성 배출 대상이 될 뿐이다. 원화 기준 테더 가격이 계속 눌리는 것도 같은 얘기다. 지금 시드를 해외로 옮기면 싼값에 테더를 사는 셈이라 환전 손실은 오히려 작지만, 이게 국내 시장 전체가 얇아지고 있다는 뜻이기도 하다. 어느 쪽이든 지금 필요한 건 포지션이 아니라 대기다. 그래서 결론은 관망이다. 원화마켓 거래대금이 상장 없이도 회복되는지, 김치 프리미엄이 마이너스에서 벗…
8.05~8.07 상장 모음 GRVT, UB, CAP, KMNO, BSB 전반적인 기조 - 현선 0 - 혹은 낮은 현선 괴리 1~2%띠기 잡풀 - 업비트 시작 갭 별로 없는 편 - 1% 띠기 - 거래량 바닥 - 빗썸의 경우 호가 x - UB/BSB의 경우 거래 시작 전 호가가 없는 수준이라 2~3% 위에 걸어둔 사람이 피뢰침 먹고 이후 노갭 (소액) - 업비트의 경우 거래 시작 후 후펌이 자주 나옴 - 후펌으로 현선 괴리가 벌어지는 경우도 노션 복기 ⤵️ $GRVT 상장 (Up) $UB 상장 (Bit) $CAP 상장 (Up) $KMNO 상장 (Up) $BSB 상장 (Up/Bit) 이번주동안 상장만 총 8차례했네요 모두 크게 특기사항 없이 비슷한 양상이었고, 차트 궁금하신 분들만 노션 보시면 될 것 같네요 따저씨들도 더 이…
❤3
19:26 입금량 KMNO 😇 업비트 약 25.5억 가량 (핫/콜드 집금 기준)
15:56 입금량 BSB 😇 업비트 약 30억 가량 (미집금량 포함 기준) 다음주면 20억 커트가 될것만같은 기분
14:53 입금량 BSB 😇 업비트 약 24억 가량 (미집금량 포함 기준) 😆 빗썸 약 6.3억 가량 자강두천 연기대회 따저씨들 조차 원상러쉬에 지쳐버렸다... 좃썸은 그래도 6억이라 할듯
CAP 14:00 입금량 😇 업비트 약 43억 가량 (미집금량 포함)
12:55 입금량 UB 😆 빗썸 약 6.6억 가량 현선0이라 그런지 생각보다 많이 들어왔네요 연기는 안할듯
Posted without readable text
❤3
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
16:57 입금량 GRVT 😇 업비트 약 52억 가량
👀4
Posted without readable text
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @pannpunch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 11,659 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“판판펀치” (@pannpunch), 3,250 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pannpunch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.