$1.33M/24h 오늘의 성적표 https://hypurrscan.io/dashboard 🌧Hyperliquid_KR 공지방 | 채팅방 | X
👍2

Channel
@Hyperliquid_KR_announce
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,961subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002339532413 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Hyperliquid_KR_announce |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Hyperliquid_KR_announce |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 3,961 | -6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 3,967 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:32 | 3,973 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:31 | 3,975 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,588 |
| Reactions total | 54 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
54 reactions across 17 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28 | 51.9% | |
| 👍 | 24 | 44.4% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 3.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
$1.33M/24h 오늘의 성적표 https://hypurrscan.io/dashboard 🌧Hyperliquid_KR 공지방 | 채팅방 | X
👍2
$1.38M/24h 오늘의 성적표 https://hypurrscan.io/dashboard 🌧Hyperliquid_KR 공지방 | 채팅방 | X
❤2
tradeXYZ, UNITREE Pre-IPO Perpetual (IPOP) 마켓이 정식 출시 UNITREE는 상하이 과학기술혁신판(STAR Market)에 종목 코드 688836으로 상장될 예정인 Unitree Technology Co., Ltd.의 A주 1주당 시장 예상 가격을 반영하는 프리 IPO 마켓입니다. Unitree는 4족 보행 로봇, 휴머노이드 로봇 및 로봇 팔을 설계하고 제조하는 기업입니다. IPO가 완료된 이후에는 오라클이 당시의 역외 달러·위안 환율(USD/CNH)을 적용해 위안화 기준 주가를 미국 달러로 환산합니다. https://x.com/tradexyz/status/2085005820417237083?s=20 🌧Hyperliquid_KR 공지방 | 채팅방 | X
❤3
$1.50M/24h 오늘의 성적표 https://hypurrscan.io/dashboard 🌧Hyperliquid_KR 공지방 | 채팅방 | X
❤3
: : [인베스트먼트/리포트] 2026 Q2 Hyperliquid 리포트 작성자: Four Pillars (Ponyo), GLC Research - 본 리포트는 2026년 2분기 하이퍼리퀴드의 재무 성과와 생태계 동향, 구조적 변화를 다룬다. 1분기가 하이퍼리퀴드의 "House of All Finance" 비전이 현실임을 증명한 분기였다면, 2분기는 그 위에서 실물 자산이 본격적으로 거래되고 제도권 자본이 유입되기 시작한 분기다. HIP-3 실물자산(RWA) 시장은 주식과 원자재, Pre-IPO를 아우르며 잇따라 최고 거래대금을 경신했고, 전체 거래대금에서 차지하는 비중도 최근 세 분기 동안 1.8% → 20.7% → 32.2%로 증가했다. 2분기 거래대금만 2,133억 달러로, 플랫폼 전체 거래의 3분의 1에 육박한다. - 제도권 자본은…
$1.27M/24h 오늘의 성적표 https://hypurrscan.io/dashboard 🌧Hyperliquid_KR 공지방 | 채팅방 | X
❤3
시장은 주말에 쉬지만, 뉴스는 쉬지 않습니다. Blockworks Research는 Hyperliquid에서 주식, 원자재, 외환, 지수가 24시간 거래된 총 614번의 주말 데이터를 분석했습니다. 시장이 멈추지 않고 계속 거래될 때 어떤 일이 벌어지는지를 보여주는 최초의 실증 데이터입니다. 주말 시장은 안정적으로 작동했습니다. 다른 모든 시장이 문을 닫은 동안에도 평일 수준의 좁은 스프레드와 유사한 체결 비용을 유지했습니다. 더욱 주목할 점은 주말에 형성된 가격이 시장의 재개장 가격을 상당히 정확하게 예측했다는 것입니다. 일반적인 재개장 가격의 예측 오차를 절반 가까이 줄였으며, 큰 폭의 변동이 발생한 경우에는 94.9%의 확률로 방향을 정확하게 맞혔습니다. https://x.com/HyperliquidPC/status/2084280…
👍2
Price Discovery in Hyperliquid’s Weekend Markets (Blockworks Research) Hyperliquid의 HIP-3를 기반으로 운영되는 TradeXYZ는 주식, 원자재, 외환, 지수, 프리IPO 기업 등 전통자산에 대한 무기한 선물 시장을 24시간 제공하고 있습니다. 출시 후 불과 수개월 만에 100개 이상의 시장을 구축했으며, 최근 30일 기준 일평균 거래량은 약 $3.7B로 Hyperliquid 전체 무기한 선물 거래량의 52%를 차지할 정도로 빠르게 성장했습니다. 이 시장의 가장 큰 특징은 전통시장이 열려 있을 때는 실제 기초자산의 외부 가격을 기준으로 거래되지만, 주말이나 휴장 시간에는 Hyperliquid 내부의 주문과 거래를 통해 자체적으로 가격을 형성한다는 점입니다. 이를 통해 기존…
❤2👏2
$0.73M/24h 오늘의 성적표 https://hypurrscan.io/dashboard 🌧Hyperliquid_KR 공지방 | 채팅방 | X
👍4
주간 업데이트 제품 및 기술 + TWAP 주문에 다음 기능이 추가되었습니다. a) 주문 실행 시간 연장: TWAP 주문의 최대 실행 시간이 기존보다 확대되어 최대 7일까지 설정할 수 있습니다 b) 하위 주문 간격의 동적 설정: 전체 주문 규모와 설정된 실행 시간을 기준으로 하위 주문 간격이 자동으로 산정되며, 최소 간격은 30초로 설정됩니다. c) 최소 주문 규모 인하: TWAP 주문당 최소 명목가치가 $100로 낮아졌으며, 하위 주문당 최소 명목가치는 기존과 동일하게 $10로 유지됩니다. + HIP-4 무허가 배포의 초기 구현 버전이 테스트넷에 출시되었습니다. 자세한 내용은 아래 문서에서 확인할 수 있습니다. https://hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-docs/for-developers/api/hip-4…
❤3👍1
$0.73M/24h 오늘의 성적표 https://hypurrscan.io/dashboard 🌧Hyperliquid_KR 공지방 | 채팅방 | X
❤2
$0.79M/24h 오늘의 성적표 https://hypurrscan.io/dashboard 🌧Hyperliquid_KR 공지방 | 채팅방 | X
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Hyperliquid_KR_announce. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 377,222 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hyperliquid_한국지부 공지방” (@Hyperliquid_KR_announce), 3,961 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Hyperliquid_KR_announce.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.