Channel
@KOREASTOCK11
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,798subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001168289390 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KOREASTOCK11 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KOREASTOCK11 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 2,798 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 2,797 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:07 | 2,797 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,956 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
5 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 3 | 60.0% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 40.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
폐쇄형(프라이빗/온프레미스) LLM 시장이 거대한 규모로 성장하는 가장 큰 이유는 기업의 핵심 데이터 유출을 막고, 금융·공공기관의 엄격한 망분리 및 개인정보 규제를 완벽히 충족하는 유일한 대안이기 때문입니다. 실제로 글로벌 엔터프라이즈 LLM 시장은 2026년 기준 약 8조~14조 원 규모를 형성하며 연평균 30% 이상 급성장 중이고, 전체 LLM 구축 수요의 40% 이상을 차지할 만큼 거대한 비중을 차지하고 있습니다. 이러한 폐쇄형 LLM 시장은 특히 국내 IT 기업들에게 매우 유리한 기회의 장입니다. 국내 기업과 공공기관은 보안 문제로 폐쇄형 구축 선호도가 70%를 넘어서며, 이에 따라 국내 프라이빗 AI 시장만 해도 이미 1조 원 안팎 규모로 빠르게 성장했습니다. 해외 빅테크에 데이터 주권을 넘기지 않으려는 '소버린 AI' 트렌드 속…
Palantir. Unity software, Microsoft. Soft > Hard
"유니티 소프트 주가, 오늘 급등하는 이유는?" https://kr.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/article-93CH-2049210
빅샷: 피지컬 AI data 기업에 주목 (feat. SaaS) 팔란티어의 2026년 2분기 실적은 단순히 한 기업의 '어닝 서프라이즈'를 넘어 글로벌 AI 산업이 본격적인 수익 창출 단계에 진입했음을 보여준 상징적인 사건으로 평가된다. 매출은 전년 동기 대비 93% 증가한 19억4,000만 달러를 기록했고, 미국 상업 부문 매출은 149% 급증했다. 여기에 영업활동현금흐름과 잉여현금흐름(FCF) 마진이 각각 63%에 달해 AI 사업이 막대한 현금을 창출할 수 있다는 점을 입증했다. 특히 시장이 주목한 지표는 Rule of 40이다. Rule of 40은 소프트웨어(SaaS) 기업을 평가할 때 가장 널리 사용되는 지표로, 매출 성장률과 영업이익률(또는 FCF 마진)을 합산한 수치를 의미한다. 일반적으로 이 수치가 40%를 넘으면 성장성…
Photo, posted without a caption
* 폐쇄형 LLM : 매우 중요하고,우리나라 수헤주를 찾아서 ....
팔란티어 $PLTR 2026년 2분기 실적 (시간외 +8%) 조정 주당순이익 (Adjusted EPS): $0.41 (예상치 $0.35) 매출액 (Revenue): 19억 4,000만 달러 ($1.94B, 예상치 $1.81B) 조정 EBITDA (Adjusted EBITDA): 12억 달러 ($1.20B, 예상치 $1.09B) 미국 상업 매출 (U.S. Commercial Revenue): 7억 6,400만 달러 ($764M, 예상치 $716.4M) 3분기 매출 전망 (Sees Q3 Revenue): 21억 6,000만 달러 ($2.16B, 예상치 $2.00B) 연간 매출 전망 (Sees FY Revenue): 81억 5,000만 ~ 81억 6,000만 달러 ($8.15B–$8.16B, 이전 전망치 $76.5억–$76.6억 대비 상향) …
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
받) 창신메모리($CXMT ) 기술유출 주동자 및 조직 실체 주모자 : 전직 삼성전자 부장·연구원급 핵심 인력 • 김 모 씨 (전 삼성전자 부장 / CXMT 개발실장): 삼성전자에서 D램 공정 개발에 관여했던 인력. 2016년 CXMT 설립 직후 개발실장으로 영입되어 10나노급 D램 기술 확보를 위한 핵심 인력 영입을 주도. 2026년 4월 파기환송심에서 징역 6년4개월·벌금 2억원 선고. • 전 모 씨 (전 삼성전자 연구원 / CXMT 초기 개발 참여): 삼성전자의 10나노급 D램 핵심 공정정보(PRP 등 수백 단계) 를 자필 노트(12장)에 옮겨 적어 CXMT 이직 시 유출. 2025년 구속기소, 2026년 4월 1심에서 징역 7년 선고. • 양 모 씨 (전 삼성전자 임원 / CXMT 2기 개발실장): 18나노급 D램 개발 전체를 …
일부 보도에서 미국과 일본의 공동 외환시장 개입을 계기로 "2024년 8월 블랙 먼데이가 재연될 수 있다"는 시나리오를 제시했지만, 논리 전개에는 상당한 비약이 있다. 가장 큰 문제는 엔 캐리 트레이드 청산을 글로벌 증시 급락의 핵심 원인처럼 단순화했다는 점이다. 2024년 8월 아시아 증시 급락은 엔 캐리 트레이드만으로 설명되지 않는다. 당시에는 미국 경기 둔화 우려와 연준의 금리 인하 기대 변화, AI 관련 기술주의 과도한 밸류에이션 부담, 대형 기술주 차익실현, 투자심리 위축 등이 동시에 작용했다. 엔 캐리 청산은 여러 변수 가운데 하나였을 뿐이며, 이를 모든 폭락의 원인으로 연결하는 것은 지나친 단순화다. 현재 상황도 당시와는 상당히 다르다. 이번 외환시장 개입은 미국과 일본이 환율의 급격한 변동을 완화하기 위해 공조한 것으로, 본…
마이크로 하면서 소프트 한것들이 움직인다. SaaS
https://www.news1.kr/world/international-economy/6244791#_enliple
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @KOREASTOCK11. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 977,770 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“빅샷 전략 : 새로운 여정” (@KOREASTOCK11), 2,798 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KOREASTOCK11.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.