Channel
@bilgasem
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,416subscribers
+667 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001901360941 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bilgasem |
| Description | جزى الله خيرا من وجد شيئا نافعا في،القناة فنشره ولو بدون ذكر مصدره وكتب أجره وضاعف ثوابه |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 December 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 65 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bilgasem |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also sits inside a group of 7 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
No sample pairs were kept for this entry. The counts below were measured, but without the pairs there is nothing here for you to open and check, so treat the relationship as recorded rather than demonstrated.
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @bawh_alruwh | 13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 45 minutes | this entry (13–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 62 comparable posts for this entry, running 8 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 7 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @bilgasem — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 7 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 07:15 | 25,416 | +22 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 19:28 | 25,394 | +3 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 14:15 | 25,391 | +12 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 13:05 | 25,379 | -6 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 10:26 | 25,385 | +5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 06:46 | 25,380 | +6 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 09:55 | 25,374 | +7 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 11:36 | 25,367 | +7 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 08:16 | 25,360 | +8 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 04:58 | 25,352 | -5 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 06:36 | 25,357 | +15 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 03:16 | 25,342 | -1 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 23:00 | 25,343 | +8 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 20:25 | 25,335 | +10 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 17:51 | 25,325 | +3 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 14:36 | 25,322 | +3 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 11:26 | 25,319 | +13 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 08:15 | 25,306 | -7 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 04:29 | 25,313 | +6 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 02:38 | 25,307 | first reading |
73 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 141 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 73 (8 July 2026 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 79,250 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Nov 2026, 21:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (25.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
*ولوالديك* ... أمر الله بالإحسان للوالدين والبر بهما وهو أمر عام يعم كل أنواع الإحسان والبر ولكن الله خص بعد العموم نوعا خاصا من البر وهو بر الشكر والامتنان وقرنه بشكره سبحانه قال تعالى ﴿وَوَصَّیۡنَا ٱلۡإِنسَـٰنَ بِوَ ٰلِدَیۡهِ حَمَلَتۡهُ أُمُّهُۥ وَهۡنًا عَلَىٰ وَهۡنࣲ وَفِصَـٰلُهُۥ فِی عَامَیۡنِ أَنِ ٱشۡكُرۡ لِی وَلِوَ ٰلِدَیۡكَ إِلَیَّ ٱلۡمَصِیرُ ) والشكر له صور منها إظهار الامتنان الدائم والاعتراف المستمر بفضله…
*ما الصفة التي تذكرها عند التوكل؟* *(إِنِّی تَوَكَّلۡتُ عَلَى ٱللَّهِ رَبِّی وَرَبِّكُمۚ مَّا مِن دَاۤبَّةٍ إِلَّا هُوَ ءَاخِذُۢ بِنَاصِیَتِهَاۤۚ إِنَّ رَبِّی عَلَىٰ صِرَ ٰطࣲ مُّسۡتَقِیمࣲ )* توعدت عاد هودا عليه السلام فتوكل على ربه وذكر الصفة المناسبة التي تعلق بها توكله وهو أن كل دابة ومنها قومه فهم في قبضة الله وسلطانه وتحت قهره وحكمه فلا يصل إليه شيء من كيدهم فإذا توكلت على الله في شأن من الشؤون فاذكر صفة ربك ا…
*(وجه النهار)* سمى الله أول النهار وجه النهار في قوله تعالى ﴿وَقَالَت طَّاۤىِٕفَةࣱ مِّنۡ أَهۡلِ ٱلۡكِتَـٰبِ ءَامِنُوا۟ بِٱلَّذِیۤ أُنزِلَ عَلَى ٱلَّذِینَ ءَامَنُوا۟ وَجۡهَ ٱلنَّهَارِ وَٱكۡفُرُوۤا۟ ءَاخِرَهُۥ لَعَلَّهُمۡ یَرۡجِعُونَ (٧٢)﴾ [آل عمران ٧٢] قال الطبري رحمه الله ﴿وَجْهَ النَّهَارِ﴾. يعنى: أوَّل النهار. وسُمِّى أولُه وجهًا له؛ لأنه أحسنُه، وفي ذلك فوائد منها: من استقام له وجه الشيء استقام له بقيته فمن وفق لص…
( *في شغل)* أغنى رجل في العالم لا بد أن يشعر بالسأم مهما تكاملت عنده الملذات والصحة والأموال لأن له طاقة محدودة في كل شهواته تنتهي عند الإشباع يشبع من قصره يشبع من طعامه وشرابه يشبع من ملذاته يشبع من السفر بعد أيام يسأم من الجزيرة والنهر والشلالات والحفلات يسأم لأن طاقته للمتعة واللذة محدودة ونافدة وشحيحة الوفرة ممكن أن تكون حولنا لكن الندرة في داخلنا في قدرتنا على التلذذ والاستمتاع قال تعالى عن أهل الجنة ﴿ إِنَّ أ…
*نافذة الراحة .....* أنجع أدوية الهم والضيق والخوف ....دواء نص الله عليه في كتابه وعلق عليه فلاح العبد وطيب حياته ومآله وجعل هذا الدواء يسيرا وفي طوق الإنسان وإمكانه. دواء يسهل تناوله على كل أحد ويسهل فهمه ويمكن البدء على الفور في أي ظرف في أي مكان وأي زمان إنه العمل ....الصالح العمل لا مجرد التفكير والحزن والهم العمل الطارد للهواجس والهموم والتوتر تشعر الآن بحزن اعمل الآن ....لا تتأخر سبح ....اقرأ القرآن .....قم إل…
(وحسن أولئك رفيقا) نفكر في نعيم الجنة فتذهب خيالاتنا لنعيم المطاعم والمشارب واللذات والمساكن وهي نعيم عظيم بلا ريب وهناك نعيم آخر من كمالات النعيم وهو أن سكان الجنة لا يشبهون سكان الدنيا فهم خلق مطهرون ليس عندهم خلق أو طبع أو سلوك واحد تنفر النفوس منه كل ما يؤلمك هنا من الخلق من الأقارب من الأصدقاء من المعارف من الذي تلقاهم في المجامع ليس في الجنة شيء منه لن ترى إلا خلقا تسعد بهم تحبهم يعجبك كل شيء فيهم يعجبك كلامهم …
فتحسسوا علامة الفأل الحركة والبحث عن مفاتيح الفرج الواثقون بروح الله يخرجون للبحث عنه مهما بدا أن الأماكن كلها مقفرة من أسباب الفرج لا تقعد مكبلا ترسف في قيود حزنك رغم يأسهم من أخيهم (فلما استيأسوا منه خلصوا نجيا) ومع ذلك قال أبوهم (فتحسسوا) نتحسس عنهم ماذا وكيف وأين لم يقل لهم تحسسوا فحسب الثقة لا تعني القعود قد يكون حتى الخروج المجرد ميلادا لليسر والأمل قم لا تقل إلى أين قم ليس للبحث عن شيء بعينه لكن التعرض في ا…
وأحاذر يساور الإنسان القلق في أوجاعه فهو لا يتألم فحسب بل يخاف مما سيؤول إليه مرضه وأسباب ألمه ومدى خطورة ما يشعر به هل هو مرض عارض؟ أو مؤشر لمرض عضال؟ وربنا اللطيف بما أوحى إلى رسوله صلى الله عليه وسلم يعلمنا دواء للألم والخوف معا ففي صحيح مسلم عن عثمان بن أبي العاص أنَّه شَكا إلى رَسولِ اللهِ صلَّى اللهُ عليه وسلَّم وجَعًا يَجِدُه في جَسَدِه مُنذُ أسلَمَ، فقال له رَسولُ اللهِ صلَّى اللهُ عليه وسلَّم: ضَعْ يَدَكَ …
وأحسن كما أحسن الله إليك أدركت الناس إذا أنعم الله على أحدهم بنعمة شارك الآخرين فرحته بطعام أو هدية أو توزيع. فإذا نجا من حادث أولم وجمعهم وسماه عيد سلامة؛ وإذا باع شيئا ذبح وضيف أو قسم؛ وإذا توظف أو ترقى أو بنى بيتا أو حصد زرعا أو أنتجت له ماشيته بل كانوا يذبحون عند صبة البيت؛ وعند الفراغ من العمل ويسمونها عمالة. ويولمون عند الصلح وعند القدوم من الحج والسفر وعند البشارة بالماء عند حفر البئر وعند البشارة بشيء؛ …
قال الله تعالى: {وكأين من نبي قاتل معه ربيون كثير فما وهنوا لما أصابهم في سبيل الله وما ضعفوا وما استكانوا والله يحب الصابرين}. وقرأ بعض السبعة: {قُتل معه}. قال ابن تيمية: «كون النبي قاتل معه -أو قتل معه- ربيون كثير؛ لا يستلزم أن يكون معهم في الغزاة، بل كل من اتبع النبي وقاتل على دينه؛ فقد قاتل معه. وكذلك كل من قتل على دينه؛ فقد قتل معه. وحينئذ تظهر كثرة هؤلاء، فإن الذين قاتلوا وأصيبوا وهم على دين الأنبياء كثيرون. …
نعمة الإيمان... قال لي صاحبي ماذا لو كان مصمم خرائط القوقل مسلما كيف سيكون أجره!؟ قلت: سيكون عظيما؛ فكل دلالة واحدة على الطريق: صدقة كما في في صحيح البخاري (ودَلُّ الطريقِ صدقةٌ) وعند الترمذي وإرشادُك الرجلَ في أرضِ الضلالِ لك صدقة، بل بعتق رقبة قال صلى الله عليه وسلم من مَنح مَنيحةَ لَبَنٍ أو ورِقٍ، أو هَدَّى زُقاقًا؛ كان له مثلُ عِتقِ رَقَبَة". هدى زقاقا أيذ: دل طريقا رواه أحمد والترمذي -واللفظ له- وابن حبان في …
كيف أخلص وأنجو من الرياء؟ #الإخلاص
Showing the 12 most recent of 73 posts we hold for @bilgasem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@bilgasem edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 1 post on @bilgasem as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 53 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 175 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“د. عبدالله بن بلقاسم” (@bilgasem), 25,416 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bilgasem.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.