Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for قناة د. عيسى السعدي

Channel

قناة د. عيسى السعدي

@dr_alsaady

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,563subscribers

-86 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001209376060
TypeChannel
Username@dr_alsaady
Descriptionالقناة الرسمية للدكتور / عيسى بن عبدالله السعدي . مؤلف وأستاذ في العقيدة / الطائف . وهي قناة تعنى بنشر الدروس والفوائد العقدية خاصة ، والعلمية عامة . رابط قناة الدروس العلمية على اليوتيوب www.youtube.com/channel/UCwngxWmURPfci1JQ9wkJ3yA
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/dr_alsaady

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@dr_alsaady/6478 · this entry23 Jul 2026, 22:18 UTC@alfraid1/1947824 Jul 2026, 04:29 UTC1.006.2 hours
@dr_alsaady/6481 · this entry25 Jul 2026, 19:34 UTC@alfraid1/1948026 Jul 2026, 03:53 UTC1.008.3 hours
@dr_alsaady/6482 · this entry25 Jul 2026, 21:21 UTC@alfraid1/1948126 Jul 2026, 03:53 UTC1.006.5 hours
@dr_alsaady/6484 · this entry26 Jul 2026, 21:43 UTC@alfraid1/1948327 Jul 2026, 01:48 UTC1.004.1 hours
@dr_alsaady/6489 · this entry29 Jul 2026, 21:58 UTC@alfraid1/1949630 Jul 2026, 08:06 UTC1.0010 hours
@dr_alsaady/6491 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 04:20 UTC@alfraid1/194983 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC1.006.5 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@alfraid114 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.006.5 hoursthis entry (14–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 76 comparable posts for this entry, running 22 July 2026 to 8 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @dr_alsaady — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

13,56313,66013,611.56 August 2026 — 13,649 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,647 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,650 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,649 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,644 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,645 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,643 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,655 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,657 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,653 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,652 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,648 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,646 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,648 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,658 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,652 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,655 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,660 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,657 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,659 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,658 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,653 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,655 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,660 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,656 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,648 subscribers8 September 2026 — 13,653 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,654 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,656 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,654 subscribers16 September 2026 — 13,646 subscribers18 September 2026 — 13,635 subscribers1 October 2026 — 13,631 subscribers6 October 2026 — 13,609 subscribers10 October 2026 — 13,613 subscribers13 October 2026 — 13,619 subscribers15 October 2026 — 13,623 subscribers16 October 2026 — 13,616 subscribers18 October 2026 — 13,618 subscribers19 October 2026 — 13,616 subscribers20 October 2026 — 13,612 subscribers21 October 2026 — 13,605 subscribers24 October 2026 — 13,599 subscribers26 October 2026 — 13,597 subscribers27 October 2026 — 13,595 subscribers28 October 2026 — 13,592 subscribers29 October 2026 — 13,590 subscribers30 October 2026 — 13,589 subscribers31 October 2026 — 13,590 subscribers1 November 2026 — 13,585 subscribers2 November 2026 — 13,581 subscribers4 November 2026 — 13,583 subscribers5 November 2026 — 13,581 subscribers6 November 2026 — 13,573 subscribers7 November 2026 — 13,575 subscribers8 November 2026 — 13,573 subscribers9 November 2026 — 13,563 subscribers6 August 20269 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 96 days, net -86. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,548–13,675 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 17:1713,563-10
8 Nov 2026, 09:0013,573-2
7 Nov 2026, 06:3913,575+2
6 Nov 2026, 03:0713,573-8
5 Nov 2026, 03:0713,581-2
4 Nov 2026, 03:0713,583+2
2 Nov 2026, 06:2713,581-4
1 Nov 2026, 09:4613,585-5
31 Oct 2026, 12:4513,590+1
30 Oct 2026, 09:3513,589-1
29 Oct 2026, 11:1713,590-2
28 Oct 2026, 11:5013,592-3
27 Oct 2026, 11:2113,595-2
26 Oct 2026, 14:4413,597-2
24 Oct 2026, 19:2813,599-6
21 Oct 2026, 13:4013,605-7
20 Oct 2026, 08:2913,612-4
19 Oct 2026, 06:2713,616-2
18 Oct 2026, 05:2713,618+2
16 Oct 2026, 04:2713,616first reading

Engagement

100 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.6%
avg views ÷ 13,563 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,980
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
33
of 100 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held100 (22 July 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total59,283
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 19:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
101
Videos
20
Links
77

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 33 posts held from the last 30 days (15.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 21:47 UTC714 viewsread 10 November 2026

‏من أمثال العرب : سقط العشاء به على سرحان ؛ يضرب مثلا للرجل يطلب الأمر التافه فيقع في هلكة. وأصل المثل، أن دابة طلبت العشاء فهجمت على الأسد. والسرحان: الأسد بلغة هذيل، وبلغة غيرهم من العرب: الذئب. ‏الأمالي ١٠٦

8 Nov 2026, 21:35 UTC906 viewsread 10 November 2026

‏( من تحلم بحلم لم يره كلف أن يعقد بين شعيرتين ولن يفعل ) ، رواه البخاري ، وفي رواية للترمذي : ( من تحلم كاذبا كلف يوم القيامة أن يعقد بين شعيرتين ولن يعقد بينهما ) . ‏قال ابن الأثير : إن قيل: إن كذب الكاذب في منامه لا يزيد على كذبه في يقظته، فلم زادت عقوبته ووعيده وتكليفه عقد الشعيرتين؟ ‏قيل: قد صح الخبر : إن الرؤيا الصادقة جزء من النبوة ، والنبوة لا تكون إلا وحيا، والكاذب في رؤياه يدعي أن الله تعالى أراه ما لم يره،…

8 Nov 2026, 05:26 UTC923 viewsread 10 November 2026

‏قال ابن حجر : ومن المستظرفات ما رواه عبد الرزاق عن ابن جريج عن عمرو بن دينار أن إنسانا جاء إلى أبي هريرة فقال: أصبحت صائماً فنسيت فطعمت ، فقال له: لا بأس . ثم قال: دخلت على إنسان فنسيت وطعمت وشربت ، فقال له: لا بأس ؛ الله أطعمك وسقاك ، ثم قال: دخلت على آخر فنسيت فطعمت ! فقال أبو هريرة: أنت إنسان لم تتعود الصيام . ‏فتح الباري ‏ ٤ / ١٥٧

7 Nov 2026, 21:08 UTC≈1,050 viewsread 10 November 2026

‏لما احتضر عنبسة بن أبي سفيان جزع، فقيل له: ما يجزعك، ألم تكن على سمت من الإسلام حسن؟! ‏قال: وما لي لا أجزع؟ ولست أدري على ما أقدم عليه، مع أن أرجى عملي عندي حديث حدثتني به أم حبيبة، أنها سمعت النبي - صلى الله عليه وسلم - يقول: «من حافظ على أربع ركعات قبل الظهر، وأربع بعدها، حرمه الله على النار» ؛ فوالله ما تركتهن منذ يوم سمعتهن إلى يومي هذا. ‏شرح السنة ‏ ٣ / ٤٦٤

6 Nov 2026, 21:52 UTC≈1,460 viewsread 10 November 2026

قيل للصاحب بن عباد: أنت رجل معتزلي وابن المقرئ محدث، وأنت تحبه! قال: لأنه كان صديق والدي، وقد قيل: مودة الآباء قرابة الأبناء ، ولأني كنت نائما فرأيت النبي - صلى الله عليه وسلم - في النوم يقول لي: أنت نائم، وولي من أولياء الله على بابك؟! فانتبهت ودعوت وقلت: من بالباب؟فقال: أبو بكر بن المقرئ. سير اعلام النبلاء ١٦ / ٤٠١

6 Nov 2026, 20:44 UTC≈1,180 viewsread 10 November 2026

‏أصدق بيت قالته العرب قول القائل : ‏ وما حملت من ناقة فوق ظهرها ‏ أبر وأوفى ذمة من محمد ‏بهجة المجالس ‏ ٤٥٥

6 Nov 2026, 20:39 UTC≈1,140 viewsread 10 November 2026

‏قال ابن مسعود - رضي الله عنه - : تكلموا بالحق تعرفوا به ، واعملوا به تكونوا من أهله . ‏بهجة المجالس ‏ ٤٥٤

6 Nov 2026, 20:33 UTC≈1,140 viewsread 10 November 2026

‏قال الشاعر : ‏عسى الكرب الذي أمسيت فيه ‏ يكون وراءه فرج قريب ‏فإن يك صدر هذا اليوم ولى ‏ فإن غدا لناظره قريب ‏ الأمالي ‏ص ٧٢

5 Nov 2026, 21:38 UTC≈1,240 viewsread 10 November 2026

‏وتنسمنا نسيم نجد وهواءها المضروب به المثل، فانتعشت النفوس والاجسام ببرد نسيمه وصحة هوائه … وما أرى أن في المعمور أرضا أفسح بسيطا، ولا أوسع أنفا، ولا أطيب نسيما ، ولا أصح هواء، ولا أمد استواء، ولا أصفى جوا، ولا انقى تربة، ولا أنعش للنفوس والابدان، ولا أحسن اعتدالا، في كل الأزمان، من ارض نجد . ‏رحلة ابن جبير ، ص ١٧١ ، ١٧٢

5 Nov 2026, 21:20 UTC≈1,300 viewsread 10 November 2026

‏يقول د / محمود الطناحي : خطأ شائع يقع فيه كثير من الناس ؛ حين يقولون : كتب الله له السلامة في حِله وترحاله . ‏هكذا يقولون (حِله ) بكسر الحاء ، والصواب في حَله بفتح الحاء ، والحَل الحلول ، نقيض الارتحال ، وأما الحِل بكسر الحاء فهو الحلال ضد الحرام ، وشواهده كثيرة منها ( وطعام الذين أوتوا الكتاب حل لكم ) . ‏من أسرار اللغة ، ص ٤١٥ ‏ باختصار

5 Nov 2026, 20:58 UTC≈1,180 viewsread 10 November 2026

‏عن حفصة - رضي الله عنها - قالت: « كان رسول الله ﷺ إذا طلع الفجر لا يصلي إلا ركعتين خفيفتين .» رواه مسلم ‏قال البغوي : عامة أهل العلم كرهوا أن يصلي الرجل بعد طلوع الفجر إلا ركعتي الفجر . ‏شرح السنة ‏ ٣ / ٤٥٩

4 Nov 2026, 21:00 UTC≈1,490 viewsread 10 November 2026

‏قال الحسن البصري:لا تستقيم أمانة رجل حتى يستقيم لسانه، ولا يستقيم لسانه حتى يستقيم قلبه. ‏بهجة المجالس ص ٤٤٨

Showing the 12 most recent of 100 posts we hold for @dr_alsaady. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

قناة إبراهيم المديهش العلمية
@ibrahim_almdehesh · 23,091
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 September 2026
القناة الرسمية للشيخ أ.د. سعد الخثلان
@saadalkhthlan · 36,159
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 2 September 2026
كتب الإمام ابن القيم
@ktbibnalqaim · 87,468
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
قناة د. أحمد الخليل 📚
@alkhalil_1 · 35,476
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
قناة الدكتور مطلق الجاسر الرسمية
@mutlaqaljasser · 21,722
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 September 2026
💎دُرَرُ الطَّريفِي💎
@drr_altarefe · 29,058
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 September 2026
قناة مؤسسة الدرر السنية
@dorarnet_telegram · 109,181
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 August 2026
جامع الدروس العلمية
@droselmyh · 38,380
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
شيخنا العصيمي
@osaimi39 · 20,769
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 September 2026
ثلاثون ثانية
@Thirty_s30 · 27,790
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 September 2026
قناة عبدالرحمن السديس
@assdais · 24,072
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
قناة طلال الحسّان.
@t_hssan · 35,696
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 3 September 2026
المصحف المرتل كاملاً 🇵🇸 ❤️
@quran1tv · 41,048
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 August 2026
مؤسسة الشيخ عبد العزيز بن باز الخيرية
@binbaz1420 · 32,089
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 5 September 2026
كناش الأنظار والفوائد
@tr728 · 22,880
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 September 2026
عبدالعزيز الطريفي
@abdulazizatarefe · 58,907
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 August 2026
‏🅾️ الْقُرْآن تَدَبَّر وَ عَمَلْ 🅾️
@tdabur1 · 71,312
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
سَرَب
@i_Sarab4 · 21,606
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 September 2026
الشيخ ابن باز رحمه الله
@A_Binbaz · 23,029
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 19 September 2026
على مُكث | أحمد السيد
@alamukth · 56,987
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 23 August 2026
ياسر الحزيمي 🎙
@ybh_100 · 94,155
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 August 2026
📚 قناة علمية فقهية تربوية 📚
@Algoayme · 46,021
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
قناة سليمان بن ناصر العبودي
@so_alobodi · 20,794
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 September 2026
شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية
@abntaymia3 · 51,966
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 107 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“قناة د. عيسى السعدي” (@dr_alsaady), 13,563 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dr_alsaady.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.