بعض أخطاء نقل الأخبار
❤19💯5

Channel
@ybh_100
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
94,685subscribers
-387 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001334259104 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ybh_100 |
| Description | مهتم بتبسيط المعرفة ونشر القيم || من بلاد التوحيد وأرض المروءات من السعودية أكتب عن الذات والعلاقات || أسعد بكم في حسابي الرسمي الوحيد |
| Created | 28 February 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ybh_100 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Sept 2026, 21:01 | 94,685 | -92 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 16:58 | 94,777 | -41 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 06:58 | 94,818 | -28 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 16:41 | 94,846 | -39 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 00:59 | 94,885 | -4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 03:16 | 94,889 | -53 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 02:37 | 94,942 | -12 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 20:42 | 94,954 | -54 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 07:57 | 95,008 | -12 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:58 | 95,020 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 95,023 | +38 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:55 | 94,985 | -28 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 95,013 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 95,015 | +29 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 94,986 | -14 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:55 | 95,000 | -9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 95,009 | -17 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 95,026 | -19 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 95,045 | -26 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:19 | 95,071 | first reading |
116 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 112 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 116 (23 June 2026 – 29 September 2026) |
| Views total | 456,040 |
| Reactions total | 6,135 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Sept 2026, 23:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 53 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
12,734 reactions across 113 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9,465 | 74.3% | |
| 💯 | 1,006 | 7.90% | |
| 👍 | 907 | 7.12% | |
| 👏 | 407 | 3.20% | |
| 👌 | 188 | 1.48% | |
| 😍 | 182 | 1.43% | |
| 😢 | 155 | 1.22% | |
| 🤩 | 96 | 0.754% | |
| 🔥 | 71 | 0.558% | |
| 💔 | 68 | 0.534% | |
| 🎉 | 60 | 0.471% | |
| 🫡 | 44 | 0.346% | |
| 😭 | 30 | 0.236% | |
| 🥰 | 25 | 0.196% | |
| 🙏 | 23 | 0.181% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 0.055% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 115 of the 116 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,025 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 116 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
بعض أخطاء نقل الأخبار
❤19💯5
الحمد لله من قبل ومن بعد ياسر الحزيمي في بودكاست سعودي يصل للعالمية وإليكم الوصفة السرّية لنجاحه | غينيس للأرقام القياسية https://share.google/ZrF6NyV1rUWPsMnkW
❤34🎉14👏8😍6💯4👌1
الدنيا مطبوعة على الكدر
❤34💯9💔3😭1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤70💯18🫡9👍3
تخلق | أدب نقل الأخبار
❤57💯3🔥2👍1😭1
لا تجعل حالة شعورية تجعلك تتخذ قرارا دائما ازعل يومين بس لا تطلق قدم اجازة بس لا تستقيل استرح بس لا تنسحب
❤144👍35👌19💯19😢12😍2
قال عبد الله بن المبارك رحمه الله: «كان الرَّجل إذا رأى من أخيه ما يكره، أمره في سِتْر، ونهاه في سِتْر، فيُؤجر في سِتْره، ويُؤجر في نهيه». 📗 روضة العقلاء لابن حبان (1/ 197)
❤108👍16💯5👌4👏4
ما الذي يجعل للحياة معنى؟ في حديث #كيف_تعيش_الحياة_بمعنى يشارك أ. ياسر الحزيمي رؤيته حول المعنى الذي يمنح الإنسان ثباتًا في نظرته إلى نفسه، ويجعل ما يعيشه أكثر اتصالًا بما يؤمن به، وأقرب إلى القيم التي تعبّر عن هويته. وفي #الشباب_والهوية يقترب الحديث من سؤال يرافق كثيرًا من الشباب: كيف نعيش حياةً لها معنى، ونرى فيها أثر قيمنا وهويتنا؟ 📅 الأربعاء | 30 سبتمبر 2026 📍 جامعة الملك سعود – قاعة الشيخ حمد الجاسر …
❤47👏5💯4👍3😢2🤩1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤69😢25💔13😭9💯8👍6🙏2
لم تكن مكة المكرمة في يوم ما هدفا عسكريا ولذلك لا يجب أن يكون استهدافها حدثا عاديا استهداف مكة ليس قضية شخصية بل هي قضية كل مسلم غيور على مقدساته يرى في التهاون معها خذلان لرسالته وتمييعاً لمبادئه
❤84💯14🫡4👏3😁3👍2👌1
من آداب الداخل إلى المسجد: الحرصُ على الصف الأول، وإكمال الصفوف: الأَوَّل فالأول، في كل صلاةٍ، وفي الجُمع والأعياد بخاصة؛ لأنه يكثر فيهما الإخلال بهذا الأدب، وقد رغَّب النبي ﷺ في ذلك بقوله ﷺ: (لو يعلم الناس ما في النداء والصف الأول، ثمَّ لم يجدوا إلا أن يستَهِموا عليه لاستَهَموا) كما أنَّ مما ينبغي الحرص عليه: الصلاةُ في ميامن الصف، لما جاء في الحديث عنه ﷺ من قوله: (إن الله وملائكته يصلون على ميامن الصفوف). وكلَّم…
❤48👍4💯4😍2
دام عزك يا وطن
❤78👍7💯7💔4🥰3😢3🔥2😁2
Showing the 12 most recent of 116 posts we hold for @ybh_100. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 59 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ياسر الحزيمي 🎙” (@ybh_100), 94,685 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ybh_100.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.