https://methag.msaaq.net

Channel
قناة فايز الزهراني
@fayz_zhr
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
14,884subscribers
+221 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001823492511 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fayz_zhr |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fayz_zhr |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:23 | 14,884 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 14,887 | +2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 14,885 | +11 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:38 | 14,874 | +10 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:29 | 14,864 | +12 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 14,852 | +66 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 14,786 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:21 | 14,787 | +11 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 14,776 | +29 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 14,747 | +63 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:41 | 14,684 | +21 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:21 | 14,663 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:08 | 14,663 | first reading |
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 45.6%
- avg views ÷ 14,884 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6,790
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (12 July 2026 – 16 August 2026) |
| Views total | 135,860 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 39s
- Average length
- 20s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
أم للإنسان ما تمنى مسالك النفوس في الانحراف العلمي
دعاءٌ مغفولٌ عنه اطلب من الله حاجاتك الدينية، كالإعانة على عبادة ضعفت عن القيام بها، أو الإعانة على ترك محرّم غلبتك نفسك عليه. اطلبه تعالى وادعه وارجه وابتهل إليه كما تفعل عند حاجاتك الدنيوية من طلب رزق وتزويج وشفاء من مرض وتفريج هم. وافعل ذلك في سجودك وأوقات الإجابة، وكرره. الله تعالى قادر، ويحب هذه "الاستعانة" منك به، لذلك نقول في كل ركعة: "إياك نعبد وإياك نستعين". فلا نستطع عبادته إلا إذا أعاننا. ثم هو يستجيب و…
الحكمة في دراسة الظواهر عدد من قضايانا التربوية والاجتماعية؛ هي ظواهر، مثل الإغراق في الصغائر، وضياع الأوقات، والمشكلات الزوجية، والجهل بالدين. وحق الظواهر ألا تعالَج من زاوية واحدة، بل حقها أن نحولها إلى مادة بحثية ودراسة تحليلية نتقصى فيها أطرافها ونتعرف أسبابها وأصولها ومآلاتها، ونخرج من ذلك بمنظومة حلول وتوصيات. وأولى من يلزمه ذلك: المؤسسات المتخصصة، والمفتون والمستشارون والباحثون. فإذا سأل إنسان عن حالة خاصة…
ابن عاشور: "فإن القرآن يأتي بذكر الحوادث التاريخية تعليماً للأمة بفوائد ما في التاريخ، ويختار لذلك ما هو من تاريخ أهل الشرائع، لأنه أقرب للغرض الذي جاء لأجله القرآن". التحرير والتنوير ٤٣٥/٢ ٰ
هذا فصل نفيس في كتاب صيد الخاطر، بسط ابن الجوزي فيه النقاش في التصور الصحيح لطلب المال والتعلق به والزهد فيه وما إلى ذلك. ووددت لو أن كل خطيب وإمام وشيخ ومعلم ومربً قرأه بعناية..
"لا يؤخذ العلم إلا ممن شُهد له بالطلب". قاعدة منهجية أولية في تلقي العلم. كتاب المذهبات، ص٣١
هذه وصية من ابن الجوزي -رحمه الله- للشباب خاصة، حول استغلال أوقاتهم في طلب العلم والاستزادة منه.. يقول: "تأملت أحوال الناس في حالة علو شأنهم فرأيت أكثر الخلق تبين خسارتهم حينئذ. فمنهم: من بالغ في المعاصي في الشباب. ومنهم: من فرط في اكتساب العلم. ومنهم: من أكثر الاستمتاع باللذات حينئذ. فكلهم نادم في حالة الكبر، حين فوات الاستدراك لذنوب سلفت، أو قوى ضعفت، أو فضيلة فاتت، فيمضي زمان الكبَر في حسرات. فإن كانت للشيخ إفاق…
هل يُرَدُّ على السفهاء؟ قال تعالى: ﴿سيقول السفهاء من الناس ما ولاهم عن قبلتهم التي كانوا عليها قل لله المشرق والمغرب يهدي من يشاء إلى صراط مستقيم﴾ [البقرة: ١٤٢]. على الرغم من أن الله وسمهم بالسفه وضعف الرأي هنا ومن قبل؛ فإنه نقض مقولاتهم وردَّ كلامهم وناقش شبههم التي يوردونها كل مرة، وهذا يدل على أن مدافعة أقوالهم في الأمة ذات أهمية، وإن كانوا سفهاء، أو كانت مقولاتهم ضعيفة الاحتجاج؛ لأن العبرة بنفاذ الكلمة وتأثير …
Video, posted without a caption
"من أعظم الجهل: استبداد الإنسان بعلمه". ابن الجوزي
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @fayz_zhr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 4,070 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@Alrawd_Almitar · 2413 postsالكُنّاشَة التَرْبَوِيَّة
@Kn_Tarbawiya · 1,9802 postsقناة محمد القحطاني العلمية
@moh396 · 12,0702 postsوارِفة.
@NouraMusfir · 922 postsقناة | د. عبدالله بن إبراهيم
@AbnTmim · 2751 post۞ أهل القرآن ۞
@Ahlalquraann · 5,3731 postرَقم السَّوانح
@Alsawaneh · 8891 postعمريات
@Amrodeh · 14,1521 postقلم يسعىٰ
@Atharwazaker · 2481 postبراءة
@barahgh16 · 1,9491 postإعلانات دروس ودورات علمية وشرعية
@elan_durus_dawrat · 451 postفُرْقَان.
@fur_qan_8 · 4361 postأهل القرآن
@haneenabd76 · 1,1951 postقناة | فيصل بن تركي
@IFaisal_Turki · 14,3961 postمذكّرات
@LeenahTutki · 31 postلطفي أحمد الطوخي🔻
@LotfiELtokhi · 24,5201 postالقرآن وقيام الليل
@maaalquran · 2591 postمشوار صنع تاريخاً 🏹🫧
@Meshwar_H · 2,4711 postنفائس تربوية
@nafaes0 · 2,5561 postربيع قلبي 🌱
@RABIIQALBI · 2,7021 postرَحَمات
@rahamaatt · 1441 postعن الذكر .. حياة القلوب ..
@s_zekr · 331 postصَفَاوَة🩵🌵
@safawah · 2991 postكتب وثقافة
@saud44422 · 5,1281 postطلب الإشراف (عمل لله) 🔖
@wnanuzj · 2,3141 postقناة يوسف بن عمر
@ybomar · 13,2631 post🍁زادُ يومِ المعاد🍁
@zaad_99 · 4291 postالزواج عند البلوغ
@zwagok · 3,7761 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ybh_100 · 95,008
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 August 2026
@ahmad_abdelmon3em · 144,900
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
@handastajyal · 107,843
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
@ayatqurancenter · 326,297
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
@itsTheQuraan · 276,966
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 10 August 2026
@husaini76 · 97,199
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
@HusseinAhmed1983 · 100,258
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 August 2026
@Quransr · 155,401
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 12 August 2026
@alsayed_ah · 519,898
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 August 2026
@Sherif_Aly · 87,824
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 17 August 2026
@Nafae3 · 106,571
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
@Rafed111 · 96,214
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 August 2026
@QusayAlosaily · 125,756
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
@shrou7alsunnah · 254,182
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
@thamar58500 · 97,657
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 August 2026
@amgadsamir · 196,354
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 16 August 2026
@alanshitaleama1 · 114,012
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
@MsjdAboAhmed · 230,437
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
@swaadelaalwaai · 93,601
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 August 2026
@Ahmed_Elaraby · 177,498
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة فايز الزهراني” (@fayz_zhr), 14,884 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fayz_zhr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.