❃ الحمد لله رب العالمين ❃ عودتنا بإذن الله مع كتاب قيِّم نافع بالغ النفع، تَغَيَّا فيه مؤلفه رحمه الله بحث الأصول التي قام عليها البحث اللغوي عند العرب، فنظر في المصادر اللغوية والأدبية المتقدمة، ودرسها دراسة متفحصة، تستنطق خباياها، وتستوضح خفاياها، إلى أن تم له نظره واستقام له رأيه، ثم أخذ يحاكم بعض آراء المستشرقين ومن تبعهم من العرب المُحدَثين في هذه الأصول اللغوية. ورأيانا أن يكون استئناف مقرأتنا بهذا الك…

Channel
إبراهيم المنوفي
@roqua_a
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,147subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001396992220 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @roqua_a |
| Description | فُلان |
| Created | 25 May 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/roqua_a |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 9,147 | -7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:51 | 9,154 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 9,151 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:30 | 9,152 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:23 | 9,152 | first reading |
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.0%
- avg views ÷ 9,147 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,280
- 22 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.07%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 22
- of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 22 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (19 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 28,191 |
| Reactions total | 245 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 528
- Videos
- 96
- Links
- 118
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
245 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 203 | 82.9% | |
| 😁 | 26 | 10.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 3.67% | |
| 👌 | 7 | 2.86% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 245reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
فإن أكثر طلاب العلم يطلبونه محبة ابن تيمية
❤27
من عنده أسئلة أو استشكالات حول الموضوع يتفضل بها في التعليقات، لعلها تثري الخواطر.
❤2
خواطر عن الفصاحة [١] لم يدُر في خلد أحد من علماء العربية الأولين أن للغة العربية مستويين بين العرَب كما تزعم طائفة من المستشرقين ومن تبعهم من العرب. وذلك أنهم يقولون أن العرب الجاهليين كانوا يستعملون اللغة العربية على مستويين: الأول: مستوى الخطاب اليومي بين الناس وبعضهم، ويزعمون أنهم في هذا المستوى كانوا يستعملون لغة أشبه بالعامية -على قول بعضهم-، أو لغة لهَجِيَّة تظهر فيها لهجة كل قبيلة بما لا يكاد يفهمها غير أهل ه…
❤6
الإفادات والإنشادات و بعض ما تحملته من لطائف المحاضرات - العلامة محمد عبد الحي الكتاني.
❤2
احتياجات التأليف وأنواع التصنيف في العلوم تختلف من جيل إلى جيل، تبعا لتغيرات العصر ومتطلبات أهله، ولا يصح أن تقلد الأجيال بعضها في طرق التأليف مع الاستغناء عن بعضها، والغفلة عما يحتاجه أهل كل زمان. وعصرنا هذا هو عصر التفريع العلمي والتدقيق في فروع العلم، ومن أنفع أنواع التصنيف في عصر كهذا هو ما يمكن أن يسمى "التأليف التكميلي التنقيحي" وهو أن يستغل الباحث نتائج المؤلفات والأبحاث المخصَّصة في المسائل الفرعية، ويزاوج بي…
❤7
قال ابن عباس: الجُبن والبخل والحرص غرائزُ سُوء، يجمعها كلها سوءُ الظن بالله عز وجل.
❤14
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3
«في مستقبله [أي الفعل: ربَط] لغتين، وهما: الضم والكسر، والعامة تختار الضم، والفصحاء لا يكادون يقولونه إلا بالكسر لخفته .. وليس كل ما ترك الفصحاء استعماله بخطأ؛ فقد يتركون استعمال الفصيح؛ لاستغنائهم بفصيح آخر». ابن درستويه.
❤2
«يقال للقصير: كُوتِي، وأصله [أي في الفارسية] كُوتَهْ». • المنتخب من كلام العرب لكراع النمل (ص: ٦٠٠).
😁26❤3
«فالخلاف إذًا بين العلماء أعم منه بين العرب. وذلك أن العلماء اختلفوا في الاعتلال لما اتفقت العرب عليه كما اختلفوا أيضًا فيما اختفلت العرب فيه وكل ذهب مذهبًا وإن كان بعضه قويًا وبعضه ضعيفًا». ابن جني.
«ومن أبيات الكتاب: فاليوم أشربْ غير مستحقبٍ •• إثمًا من الله ولا واغل أى: أشربُ. وأما اعتراض أبى العباس هنا على الكتاب [أي على تسكين باء ”أشرب“ مع كونه فعلا مضارعا حقه الرفع هنا] فإنما هو على العرب لا على صاحب الكتاب؛ لأنه حكاه كما سمعه، ولا يمكن فى الوزن أيضا غيره. وقول أبى العباس: إنما الرواية: فاليوم فاشربْ [على صيغة الأمر]، فكأنه قال لسيبويه: كذبت على العرب، ولم تسمع ما حكيته عنهم. وإذا بلغ الأمر هذا الحدّ من ا…
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @roqua_a. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 162,815 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@falakatun · 1352 postsفوائد الديوانين
@arrewayahalthkafh · 8,7301 posterror 404
@error4046998 · 3091 postغِراس الأُترج
@ghras1 · 4,9521 postنافذة
@Nafeza01 · 1471 postنورة
@nagn7oogy · 1,2721 postساعد تسعد |Sa3ed Tas3ad 4th
@sa3ed123443 · 3,3881 postزاد الرقية الشرعية(الحصن المتين )
@zaaad8 · 1,1141 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Ahmed_Elaraby · 177,586
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026
@Rawwda · 229,965
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 August 2026
@uraware2014 · 222,943
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
@itsTheQuraan · 277,179
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 10 August 2026
@Quran_Station · 365,885
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 August 2026
@alsayed_ah · 520,524
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“إبراهيم المنوفي” (@roqua_a), 9,147 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/roqua_a.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.