Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🌴 عطايا 🌴

Channel

🌴 عطايا 🌴

@qhsmp

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,971subscribers

-44 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001351981434
TypeChannel
Username@qhsmp
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/qhsmp

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,9692,0151,9926 August 2026 — 2,015 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,015 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,002 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,999 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,992 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,988 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,987 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,984 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,980 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,976 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,974 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,976 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,974 subscribers17 September 2026 — 1,969 subscribers25 September 2026 — 1,971 subscribers1,9716 August 202625 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 50 days, net -44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,962–2,022 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 14:151,971+2
17 Sept 2026, 11:381,969-5
13 Sept 2026, 19:191,974-2
9 Sept 2026, 19:571,976+2
4 Sept 2026, 06:001,974-2
1 Sept 2026, 00:481,976-4
29 Aug 2026, 08:241,980-4
25 Aug 2026, 22:131,984-3
22 Aug 2026, 19:391,987-1
19 Aug 2026, 16:371,988-4
16 Aug 2026, 17:541,992-7
13 Aug 2026, 13:271,999-3
10 Aug 2026, 04:442,002-13
6 Aug 2026, 18:152,015no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:072,015first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 27 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

81 reactions across 27 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5061.7%
💯2227.2%
👍89.88%
🤝11.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 27 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @qhsmp. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC14 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

قال العلامة بكر أبو زيد رحمه الله: “وبهذا تعلم أن تلك البادرة الملعونة من تكفير الأئمة -النووي، وابن دقيق العيد، وابن حجر العسقلاني- أو الحط من أقدارهم، أو أنهم مبتدعة ضلال، كل هذا من عمل الشيطان، وباب ضلالةٍ وإضلال، وفسادٌ وإفساد وإذا جرح شهود الشرع جرح المشهود به، ولكن الأغرار لا يفقهون ولا يتثبتون تصنيف الناس بين الظن واليقين

❤1💯1

7 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC24 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

الرد على جهل الحدادية في تبديع وتكفير العلماء وأئمة المسلمين مثل الإمام النووي وأبو حنيفة وابن حجر العسقلاني والسيوطي https://youtu.be/s45zZrInovA?si=nPBD0_V3hHd7zVad

💯1

7 Aug 2026, 03:32 UTC55 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

لا يطعن في النووي وابن حجر إلا السفهاء. - ابن عثيمين

❤4

7 Aug 2026, 02:46 UTC62 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/SnxknsQaqBY?si=FJSO1Sc1VJ_v25Ud

👍3

6 Aug 2026, 21:44 UTC64 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @almeethaq

«إذا سقطَ الاحترامُ، لم تُغنِ المودَّةُ، ولم يثبتِ الحبُّ، ولم تدمِ الصداقةُ، ولم تُصلِحِ القرابةُ ما أفسدهُ سوءُ الخُلُق. فالاحترامُ أصلُ كلِّ علاقةٍ، وعِمادُ كلِّ مودَّة؛ فإذا زال، لم يبقَ من الوصلِ إلا اسمٌ، ومن القربِ إلا صورةٌ لا روحَ فيها.»

💯5

6 Aug 2026, 20:40 UTC79 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

لماذا تصبح الطاعة مذلة داخل الزواج فقط؟ ====== نحن نقبل الطاعة في العمل، والإدارة، وسائر المؤسسات؛ لأن اختلاف الآراء يحتاج في النهاية إلى نظام يُوصل الجميع إلى قرار. والزواج كذلك. حين تختلف وجهات النظر بين الزوجين، لا يمكن أن يظل كل طرف متمسكًا برأيه إلى ما لا نهاية، وإلا تحولت العلاقة إلى صراع مستمر. قال تعالى: ﴿فَإِنْ أَطَعْنَكُمْ فَلَا تَبْغُوا عَلَيْهِنَّ سَبِيلًا﴾ والطاعة هنا ليست انتقاصًا من كرامة المرأ…

❤4💯1

6 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC83 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Naho_BoyotDafea

تتزوج فلانة... وتبدأ أول تجربة حقيقية للمعايشة تحت سقف واحد مع رجل كان غريبًا عنها، فتتفاجأ ببعض تصرفاته؛ من ناحية عادات النوم، والأكل، وطريقة التفكير، والإدارة، والاستيعاب... إلخ. ثم تكتب على صفحتها، معبرة عن دهشتها أو استنكارها لعالم الرجال، تحت مسمى: "هما الرجالة ليه بجد !؟" فيمر المنشور على عدد لا حصر له من النساء، فيتخطينه وتتفاعل معه كل من مرت بتجربة مشابهة مع زوجها، متحدثات بثقة وجزم: "كل الرجالة كده... ا…

❤2

6 Aug 2026, 11:57 UTC72 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Gb5NmRkFile

​الزوجة الصالحة تسعى بذكائها وعاطفتها لمراضاة زوجها قائلةً بلسانِ حالِها ومقالِها: «لا أذوق غمضًا حتى ترضى»، تجسيدًا لأعلى درجات المودة وحسن التبعل. لكل أنثى تسعى لتكون سكنًا لزوجها #حلة_الحسناء #على_الفطرة_السوية

👍3❤1

6 Aug 2026, 05:03 UTC88 views4 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @alsheikah

بين الألم والأمل… لحظةُ يقين ليس أشدَّ على القلب من لحظةٍ يشتد فيها الألم، حتى يظن صاحبُه أن الأبواب قد أُغلقت، وأن الطريق قد انقطع، وأن الفرج قد تأخر. لكن بين الألم والأمل تقف لحظةٌ فارقة، لا يملكها إلا من عرف ربَّه حقَّ المعرفة؛ لحظةُ يقين. لحظةٌ يستقر فيها القلب، وإن اضطربت الأحوال، ويطمئن فيها الفؤاد، وإن تأخر المطلوب؛ لأنه يعلم أن تدبير الله جل وعلا خيرٌ من تدبيره، وأن اختيار الله جل جلاله أرحم من اختياره لنف…

❤4

6 Aug 2026, 03:30 UTC81 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @fegh_alnafs

‏سألت أحد الأصدقاء وهو طبيب نفسي حاذق، قلت له: أنتم كغيركم قد تمرّون بعوارض نفسية ومصاعب، عندما يمرّ بك شيء من ذلك هل تُشخِّص نفسك؟ ‏قال: لا، ولكن أعرض نفسي على أحد الزملاء. ‏وهذا الذي قاله هو عين العقل والحكمة، وقد قال الشاعر: ‏شاوِر سِواكَ إِذا نابَتكَ نائِبَةٌ ‏ يَومًا وَإِن كُنتَ مِن أَهلِ المَشوراتِ ‏فَالعَينُ تَنْظُرُ مِنْها ما نَأىٰ وَدَنا ‏ وَلا تَرى نَفْسَها إِلّا بِمِرآةِ د.بندر الشراري

💯2

6 Aug 2026, 02:49 UTC89 views3 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @alsheikah

كان من دُعاء الحُسين رضي الله عنه : ‏َ ‏" اللهم أنت ثقتي في كل كرب ورجائي في كل شدة وأنت لي في كل أمر نزل بي ثقة وعُدّة ؛ فكم من همٍّ يضعف فيه الفؤاد وتَقِلُّ فيه الحِيلة ويَخذُلُ فيه الصديق ويَشمتُ فيه العدو فأنزلته بك وشكوته إليك رغبة فيك إليك عمن سواك". ‏ ‏تاريخ دمشق ١٤ / ٢١٧

❤3

5 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC114 views5 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @lenaltazm

اختلاط زوجتك في بيت العائلة أشرّ من الاختلاط في الشارع! قال رسول الله 👑 (الحمو الموت)

💯5

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @qhsmp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Creatures مَخلوقَاتٌ
@Creatures0 · 40,591
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
Ahmed Amer - أحمد عامر
@AhmedAmerCaller · 124,968
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 August 2026
المقرأة الحرة (نساء)
@elmaqraaelhura2 · 32,806
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 4 September 2026
افتح لي قلبك
@iftahlyqalbak · 167,809
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🌴 عطايا 🌴” (@qhsmp), 1,971 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qhsmp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.