Channel
@ayedh1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
16,192subscribers
+15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001088767950 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ayedh1 |
| Description | حساب يهتم بالفلسفة والفلاسفة والمذاهب الكلامية والأديان، والاستشراق والحضارة والتاريخ والأخلاق، والدراسات والأبحاث والنصوص والإصدارات المتعلقة بها، للإثراء. |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ayedh1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 16,192 | +5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:41 | 16,187 | +11 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:37 | 16,176 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:26 | 16,181 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 16,180 | +7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 16,173 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:19 | 16,177 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:38 | 16,177 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (25 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 35,507 |
| Reactions total | 305 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 01:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
279 reactions across 23 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 190 | 68.1% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 6.45% | |
| 😢 | 17 | 6.09% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 5.02% | |
| 🤯 | 12 | 4.30% | |
| 👀 | 7 | 2.51% | |
| 🤬 | 7 | 2.51% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 1.79% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.717% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.717% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 0.717% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.717% | |
| 👨💻 | 1 | 0.358% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 305reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
مفهوم الإنسان في وثيقة الثورة الفرنسية! تقول عالمة الاجتماع والعضو في الجمعية الوطنية الفرنسية والعضو في البرلمان الأوروبي فرانسواز جاسبار: "في وثيقة الثورة الفرنسية: (يولد الإنسان ويظل حُرًا ومتمتعًا بالمساواة في ظل القانون)، إن الإنسان المعني لم يكن سوى الرجل". قلتُ: في وثيقة ثورة التنوير الفرنسية كانت المرأة، والعبد، والطفل، لا يدخلون في مفهوم الإنسان! تقول فرانسواز جاسبار: "منذ أن ظهرت تلك المادة إلى حيّز الوج…
❤8👍1
https://twitter.com/ayedh_rs/status/1491783344803049475?s=46&t=rL4yk7hUvutNxc-J3SvMZg
❤1👏1
"حين يتعلق الأمر ب[مفهوم] الإنسان [عند فلاسفة الأنوار]، فجنس الذكور هو وحده المعني، لأن المرأة تعتبر من حيث الأصل قاصرةً مبدئيًا: ف(الجنس الضعيف) و(القاصر) هو من لا يفكر وله رؤية للعالم بالوكالة. عجزه عن استخدام فهمه بحرية دون تدخل طرف آخر، تلك هي المشكلة". ميشال أونفراي
❤7😢2🔥1
"أعتقد -عند بحث تاريخ الأفكار- أنَّ فكرة (المعرفة الخالصة) هي تجريد عال يجب علينا أن نبعده من أذهاننا. فالمعرفة مصحوبة دائماً بملحقات العاطفة والهدف، وعلينا أيضاً أن نتذكر أن هنالك درجات في تعميم الافكار". ألفريد نورث وايتهيد
❤12👍2👏2
"بعض النماذج الرمزية للأنوار [التنوير في الغرب]، وهي من هي [بمكانتها]، تقف إلى جانب المدافعين عن العبودية وتجارة الرقيق، وتشيع أفكارًا عرقية ومتحيزة جنسانيًا، رجعية أو محافظة، وعدد هام من أولئك الفلاسفة يدافعون عن الحكم بالإعدام كانط، روسو، مونتسكيو، ديدرو، فولتير" .ميشال أونفراي
❤5🔥1😱1
وصل الخوف والقلق الأوروبي في عصر النهضة من كثرة اعتناق الأفراد للإسلام هناك مبلغًا عظيمًا مثل مدى قوة الإسلام في التأثير على الإيمان والهوية، إلى درجة عدائهم للقهوة التي كانوا يسمونها: (التوت المحمدي)، و"اعتبروها القوة الرمزية المضادة للمسيحية، والسلاح السري للتحول الإسلامي". وكثيرًا ما قام الغيورون على الهوية في الغرب بتصوير من يشربون القهوة على أنهم "يتخلون عن مسيحيتهم"، ومن أجل تبغيض العامة للقهوة ’الإسلامية‘ اتهم…
❤15🤯9🥰2🔥1
هاجم جان جاك روسو اختراع المطبعة، لأنه في رأيه ساهم في انتشار كتب منحرفة وفاسدة ومضرة، تحمل أفكار وأخلاق العصر الفاسدة، وكان يعتقد أن التقدم المادي والعلمي لا يساوي تقدمًا أخلاقيًا، وأن الطباعة سببت الاضطرابات الرهيبة في أوروبا، وتزايد الشر يومًا بعد يوم، ولهذا طالب بحظرها.
❤14👍6
الأهواء (الأيديولوجية، العنصرية، الاستعمارية، الرأسمالية)، من عظم المحركات والدوافع التي تقف راء كثير من النظريات الغربية، قديمًا وحديثًا، وتغلف وقتها بطابع علمي أو عقلاني، يحقر من يخالفها، ويوصم بالتخلف والرجعية والبربرية!
❤19👏2
"عندما يتعرّق الزنوج، يغطي جلدهم عرقٌ زيتيٌّ مائل إلى السواد يلطّخ الملابس، وينبعث منه عادةً رائحة كراث كريهة للغاية". الطبيب والأنثروبولوجي الفرنسي جوليان-جوزيف فيري
🤬7👀3
" كانط قدوة الأنوار ومحنة تلاميذ المرحلة الثانوية، يعتبر فكرة الاقتراع العام جيدة، ولكن للمواطنين الإيجابيين فقط، أما المواطنون السلبيون كالمستخدمين والعمال والأجراء، وكذلك الزنوج والنساء، لا حق لهم أن يكونوا في العالم على نفس طريقة رجل أبيض مالك مغتسل جيدًا". ميشال أونفراي
🔥8👀2🤯2👍1
متى تبدأ الفلسفة؟ عايض بن سعد الدوسري متى تبدأ الفلسفة؟ | أثارة https://share.google/oTvLS5zN9tkOTuiXi
❤8
"ولم أكن أظن ابن التومرت يقول بالوجود المطلق، حتى وقفتُ بعد هذا على كلامه المبسوط فوجدته كذلك، وأنه كان يقول : الحق حقان: الحق المقيد، والحق المطلق؛ وهو الرب. وتبينت أنه لا يُثبِتُ شيئًا مِنَ الصفات، ولا ما يتميز به موجود عن موجود؛ فإنَّ ذلك يُقَيدُ شيئًا مِنَ الإطلاق". ابن تيمية
❤9
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @ayedh1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@ayedh1 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 386,863 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الدراسات الدينية والفلسفية” (@ayedh1), 16,192 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ayedh1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.