Channel
@so_alobodi
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
19,423subscribers
+129 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001001874520 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @so_alobodi |
| Created | 6 December 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/so_alobodi |
Recorded in 2019 as “قناة سليمان العبودي” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 19,423 | +37 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 19,386 | +22 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:57 | 19,364 | +36 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 19,328 | +21 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:08 | 19,307 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 19,306 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:04 | 19,307 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:36 | 19,306 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 19,305 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:05 | 19,301 | +7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 19,294 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 8 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (8 May 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 64,720 |
| Reactions total | 655 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 08:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2,402 reactions across 22 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,863 | 77.6% | |
| 👍 | 248 | 10.3% | |
| 😢 | 95 | 3.96% | |
| 👏 | 54 | 2.25% | |
| 💯 | 36 | 1.50% | |
| 🕊 | 16 | 0.666% | |
| 🎉 | 14 | 0.583% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 0.458% | |
| 😭 | 11 | 0.458% | |
| ⚡ | 10 | 0.416% | |
| 😍 | 9 | 0.375% | |
| 🍓 | 8 | 0.333% | |
| ✍ | 6 | 0.25% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 0.25% | |
| 🏆 | 4 | 0.167% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 0.125% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 0.083% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 0.083% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.083% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.042% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.042% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,402reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
لا ينبغي لمن يقرأ نصف صفحة ثم يسارق النظر في هاتفه أن يشتكي من ضعف الإنجاز وكثرة النسيان، فقد كان أهل العلم قديمًا يتطلبون البعد عن الملهيات زمن الحفظ وأوان التحصيل، قال ابن الجوزي: لا يُحمد الحفظ بحضرةِ خضرة، وعلى شاطئ نهر؛ لأن ذلك يلهي. والجوال أشد وطأة على القلب مما ذكر.
❤107👍30😢21💯8🍓6🔥3
اعلم أنَّ تركَ النظر إلى الخلق، ومحو الجاه من قلوبهم بالعمل، وإخلاص القصد، وسَترِ الحال؛ هو الذي رفع من رفع! ابن الجوزي رحمه الله
❤69👍7💯4😢2
قيل لعبد الله بن المبارك: لو قيل لك لم يبق من عمرك إلا يوم ما كنت صانعا ؟ قال: كنت أعلّم الناس.
❤66👍7💔2🤨1
لا تشكو إلا إلى خالقك -جل جلاله- فإذا أنزل العبد حاجته إلى خالقه، واستغفره من ذنوبه: (أيّده وقوّاه وهداه، وسدَّ فاقته وأغناه، وقرّبه وأقناه، وحبّه واصطفاه) كما قال وشاهد وجرّب شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية رحمه الله. https://t.me/SenaatAlmostahil
❤47👍4👏4🔥3😢3⚡1
علي آل حواء https://t.me/Ali_Hawwa نفحة من الجمال والرقي والغوص الدقيق، يقول هذا الكاتب أشياء كثيرة، لكنَّ شيئا من الأشياء لا تخطؤه العين وراء سائر حروفه التي ينظمها ببراعة .. هو أنه ما زال في جعبة الجمال بقية!
❤51🕊4👏3🤝1
قناةُ صناعةِ المستحيل قناةٌ مباركة، تُذكِّر بأن الدعاء يصنع ما تعجز عنه الأسباب، وأن ما يراه الناس مستحيلًا، فهو على الله يسير. تُجمعُ فيها المقاطع والمقالات والإشارات الإيمانية التي تُحيي اليقين، وتبعث على الإلحاح في الدعاء، وتعظيم الرجاء بالله. نسأل الله أن يبارك في هذه القناة، وأن ينفع بها، ويجعلها سببًا في إحياء القلوب، وتعظيم شأن الدعاء، وإجابة السائلين، إنه سميعٌ قريب. https://t.me/SenaatAlmostahil
❤31
https://youtu.be/JvbMbemJMpU?si=z0SMYK7Tk-PhfFbQ
❤19👏1
يصل المكتبات قريبًا بعون الله، وأسأل الله الكريم سبحانه أن يجعله من القول السديد المعان بالإلهام والتأييد.
❤104👍15🎉12👏10😍6🕊3
والعلم أقسامٌ ثلاثٌ ما لها من رابعٍ والحق ذو تبيانِ علم بأوصاف الإله وفعله وكذلك الأسماء للرحمنِ والأمر والنهي الذي هو دينه وجزاؤه يومَ المعاد الثاني والكلُّ في القرآن والسنن التي جاءت عن المبعوث بالفرقان والله ما قال امرؤ متحذلقٌ بسواهما .. إلا من الهذيان! ابن القيم رحمه الله
❤81👍4🥰1
الآية التي..أذهلتني عن الشهود كنت أجالس ثلة من الأحبة وأتحدث في تفسير آيات من كتاب الله وذهب بنا الحديث إلى قوله تعالى هُمُ ٱلَّذِینَ یَقُولُونَ لَا تُنفِقُوا۟ عَلَىٰ مَنۡ عِندَ رَسُولِ ٱللَّهِ حَتَّىٰ یَنفَضُّوا۟ۗ وَلِلَّهِ خَزَاۤىِٕنُ ٱلسَّمَـٰوَ ٰتِ وَٱلۡأَرۡضِ وَلَـٰكِنَّ ٱلۡمُنَـٰفِقِینَ لَا یَفۡقَهُونَ ٧﴾ ولم تكن هذه الآية موضوع المدارسة ولكنها جاءت للاستشهاد وعندما وقفت عند قوله تعالى ولله خزائن السموات وا…
❤111💯9👏3🕊3🔥1
ختم الفقه بصورة دورية، مع تعميق النظر وتوسيع الأفق وتدقيق البحث في كل ختمة جديدة هو السبيل للرسوخ في الفقه، أما إطالة النظر مع المبتدئين وأشباههم، وقصد التبحر بهم في زوايا من المسائل، ودقائق من الأبواب، والغرق بهم في أشتات لغوية ومباحث نادرة الوقوع، وما ينشأ عن ذلك من مراكمة السنوات وإطالةِ الزمان ما بين البداية والنهاية، وجعلِ الرحلة ما بين الطهارة والإقرار منهكة للغاية، فتتوالى السنوات ولم يتم المتفقِّه ختمة واحدة …
❤90👍27👏7🏆4😁2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤60👍11👏5🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @so_alobodi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 58,728 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة سليمان بن ناصر العبودي” (@so_alobodi), 19,423 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/so_alobodi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.