https://x.com/dar_alomariah/status/2086858781539922269?s=46&t=_nnQx7TuKykcfLL41a_RaA

Channel
قناة || عبدالله السليمان
@KNASH333
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
19,260subscribers
+119 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001116045090 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KNASH333 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 31 December 2019— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KNASH333 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 19,260 | +10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 19,250 | +17 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:01 | 19,233 | +25 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 19,208 | +13 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 19,195 | +23 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 19,172 | +10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:50 | 19,162 | +21 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 19,141 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:08 | 19,141 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 22.4%
- avg views ÷ 19,260 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4,320
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (5 June 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 17,270 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 23:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 43m 51s
- Average length
- 4m 52s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
فرحة وحسرة! ورقتان من الرقّ أندلسية عتيقة عزيزة جدا، سلمت بعد رحلة شاقة لتخبرنا عن نبأ هذه النسخة من الكتاب! أحسب أنها من كتاب "العلل" للإمام الحافظ الجهبذ أبي الحسن علي بن عبد الله بن جعفر السعدي بالولاء المديني البصري (ت ٢٣٤ هـ)، أو من كتاب آخر له، من منسوخات ق ٥ هـ. مخطوط بمكتبة معهد اللغات والحضارات في باريس في فرنسا، رقم: (MS.ARA.107A). استعملت لتقوية الجلد... وهذه حالُ من لم يعرف قيمة المكتوب (فإنه يجعل الو…
وفي الباب 👇🏻
سلم الجسد وماتت الروح من أولى ما يراعى عند إنشاد القصائد: المناسبة بين القصيدة واللحن، وهذه المناسبة من جانبين: - جانب عروضي (الجسد): موافقة اللحن لبحر القصيدة، ليسلم الحرف والصوت من الزيادة والنقص. فيسلم من اختلاس الحروف أو التمطيط والمد المفسد لها المخرج لها من حقيقتها إلى حقيقة أخرى. ويسلم من اختلال اللحن وخروجه عن قانون النغم. وهو نشاز جلي مدرك*. - جانب موضوعي (الروح): انسجام اللحن مع موضوع القصيدة وغرضها، ليسلم…
https://x.com/abuzaare/status/2073862654850900152?s=46&t=_nnQx7TuKykcfLL41a_RaA
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته حياكم الله يا شيخ عبد الله هل الكلام مستقيم ( وجعله اصل الشرك.. ) مجموع الفتاوى ج١ ص٧٦ ◾️◾️◾️◾️◾️◾️ وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته الله يحييك في المطبوع خلل -تقديم وتأخير وتداخل في الكلام- يعسر شرحه. لكن فيما يتعلق بهذا الموضع المشار إليه من الرسالة فخلاصة الأمر أنه وقع فيه إقحام. فمن قوله ص٧٦: «وجعله أصل الشرك…» إلى آخر الكلام ص٧٧: «… هو الدين النافع» ليس تابعًا لما قبله، بل ليس…
عرض الشيخ د.عبدالله البطاطي لكتاب «عقيدة البغوي» وكتاب «عقيدة ابن قدامة» تحقيق عبدالله السليمان آل غيهب برنامج الخزانة الحلقة 912 الأربعاء ٩ / ١ / ١٤٤٨هـ https://x.com/dar_alomariah/status/2070480433565901100?s=46&t=_nnQx7TuKykcfLL41a_RaA
عرض الشيخ د.عبدالله البطاطي لكتاب قاعدة في تفضيل مذهب الإمام أحمد وذكر محاسنه والذب عنه تأليف شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية تحقيق عبدالله السليمان آل غيهب برنامج الخزانة الحلقة 912 الأربعاء ٩ / ١ / ١٤٤٨هـ https://x.com/dar_alomariah/status/2070477753497923654?s=46&t=_nnQx7TuKykcfLL41a_RaA
عرض الشيخ د.عبدالله البطاطي لكتاب الآداب الشرعية للعلامة الفقيه عز الدين ابن شيخ السلامية الحنبلي (ت: ٧٦٩هـ) تحقيق عبدالله المزروع عبدالله السليمان برنامج الخزانة الحلقة 912 الأربعاء ٩ / ١ / ١٤٤٨هـ https://x.com/dar_alomariah/status/2070476823314444537?s=46&t=_nnQx7TuKykcfLL41a_RaA
عرض الشيخ د.عبدالله البطاطي لكتاب شرح المكودي لألفية ابن مالك خدم نصوصه وقدم له خبيب بن عبد القادر الواضحي وكتاب ألفية ابن مالك الخلاصة برنامج الخزانة الحلقة 912 الأربعاء ٩ / ١ / ١٤٤٨هـ https://x.com/dar_alomariah/status/2070472960893174263?s=46&t=_nnQx7TuKykcfLL41a_RaA
عرض الشيخ د.عبدالله البطاطي لكتاب منتهى الإرادات في جمع المقنع مع التنقيح وزيادات للعلامة الفقيه تقي الدين محمد بن أحمد ابن النجار الفتوحي الحنبلي (ت: ٩٧٢هـ) تحقيق محمد بن خالد باحبيل الكربي برنامج الخزانة الحلقة 912 الأربعاء ٩ / ١ / ١٤٤٨هـ https://x.com/dar_alomariah/status/2070469574756045061?s=46&t=_nnQx7TuKykcfLL41a_RaA
عرض الشيخ د.عبدالله البطاطي لكتاب الآراء المبهمة في أصول الفقه دراسة استقرائية تحليلية تأليف د.مصعب بن أحمد الدهيشي برنامج الخزانة الحلقة 912 الأربعاء ٩ / ١ / ١٤٤٨هـ https://x.com/dar_alomariah/status/2070474526069055659?s=46&t=_nnQx7TuKykcfLL41a_RaA
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @KNASH333. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 41,713 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@tahrerat · 10,5293 posts•|[ كُنَّاشَةُ المَنْهُومِ المُسْتَهَامِ ]|•
@abo7eean · 8,4291 postالعقلية
@alaqliya · 2361 postالأنابيش
@anabeshy · 3,0971 post𝐸.𝐻
@hzeryv · 271 postالرواق التيميّ
@ibntaymiya_itweio · 771 postقناة د/ سلطان العميري
@sutanalomairi · 37,3311 postخطوط الأعلام
@wejada_mss · 1,2711 postياسر_يارب يكون طالب علم حقاً
@Yseerthos · 341 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@lovekotob · 495,879
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
@alsayed_ah · 520,524
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 August 2026
@saudinews50 · 168,255
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
@wadhefadotcom · 265,879
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 August 2026
@A3rf_78k · 148,812
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة || عبدالله السليمان” (@KNASH333), 19,260 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KNASH333.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.