Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

قناة د. عبدالرحمن الجابر

@dr_aljaber

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,276subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001571291772
TypeChannel
Username@dr_aljaber
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dr_aljaber

Growth

1,2711,2761,273.57 August 2026 — 1,271 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,271 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,274 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,276 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,270–1,277 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 04:241,276+2
10 Aug 2026, 10:441,274+3
7 Aug 2026, 09:471,271no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:371,271first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.6%
avg views ÷ 1,276 subscribers
Avg views / post
174
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (9 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total870
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 09:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

18 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯633.3%
527.8%
👌316.7%
🏆211.1%
👏211.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 19:11 UTC79 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

> *قيادة العمل الشبابي |* 🧭 يُطلق #مجلس_الجمعيات_الشبابية بالشراكة مع جامعة ليدز في المملكة المتحدة النسخة الثانية من > *الزمالة السعودية البريطانية في قيادة العمل الشبابي* 🎓 برنامج قيادي تطبيقي يستهدف القيادات العليا والوسطى في المنظمات العاملة مع الشباب، ويجمع بين التأصيل المعرفي، والممارسة التطبيقية، والتعلّم الدولي، لإعداد قيادات قادرة على تطوير منظماتها، وتعزيز أثر القطاع الشبابي للتسجيل والاطلاع على الدليل

Signed د. عبد الرحمن الجابر

3 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC116 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

*هل يمكن للذكاء الاصطناعي أن يضاعف أثر المبادرات الشبابية دون أن يفقدها بعدها الإنساني؟* بين تسارع التقنية وتنامي احتياجات الشباب، لم يعد السؤال: *هل نستخدم الذكاء الاصطناعي؟ بل: كيف نوظفه بذكاء؟* تستعرض هذه المقالة كيف يمكن لتقنيات الذكاء الاصطناعي أن تعزز كفاءة واستدامة المبادرات الشبابية، من التخطيط وتحليل الاحتياجات إلى إدارة المتطوعين وقياس الأثر، مع إبراز الاعتبارات الأخلاقية التي تضمن بقاء الإنسان محور التنم

Signed د. عبد الرحمن الجابر

28 Jul 2026, 16:06 UTC207 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

✍️ *لأن القرارات الأكثر أثرًا تبدأ من فهم أدق احتياجات الشباب* … أصدر مركز مرشاد لبحوث ودراسات الشباب *( الدليل الإجرائي للبحث السريع بالمشاركة مع الشباب)*، ليقدم منهجية عملية وأدوات تطبيقية تساعد الجهات العاملة مع الشباب على تنفيذ بحوث تشاركية تسهم في تطوير البرامج والمبادرات واتخاذ قرارات مبنية على الأدلة. 📥 *حمّل الدليل*: https://mershad.org/sd/6849/?key=iiv6uuyicucph1rvybccpv361z44b1 📭*تابعنا على X*: ‏x.com/m

👌1

Signed د. عبد الرحمن الجابر

27 Jul 2026, 08:18 UTC206 viewsread 7 August 2026

لماذا لم تعد نصيحة «اتبع شغفك» صالحة للجيل الحالي؟ عقود طويلة وكتب التنمية البشرية تردد النصيحة ذاتها:"اتبع شغفك والنجاح سيلاحقك". لكن الحقيقة في سوق العمل اليوم أن هذه المقولة أصبحت أكبر مأزق يواجه الخريجين الجدد، خاصة مع دخول الذكاء الاصطناعي على الخط. إليك ملخص الأزمة والحل في خطوات سريعة: - فخ «اتبع شغفك»: المقارنة تُبنى على حالات نادرة جداً (كالرياضة أو الفنون). الواقع أن ٩٠٪ مما نحبه ونبدع فيه لا يشكل إلا نسبة

Signed د. عبد الرحمن الجابر

22 Jul 2026, 09:36 UTC262 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👏21👌1

Signed د. عبد الرحمن الجابر

16 Jul 2026, 16:14 UTC335 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

> *القيادة .. لا تُمنح |*🤚🏼 *بل تبدأ من الداخل ✨* _قريبًــا_ 🔜 #مجلس_الجمعيات_الشبابية 🖇️ نسخة مطوّرة بشكل كامل

Signed د. عبد الرحمن الجابر

15 Jul 2026, 15:08 UTC310 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

Signed د. عبد الرحمن الجابر

15 Jul 2026, 15:08 UTC303 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed د. عبد الرحمن الجابر

12 Jul 2026, 17:45 UTC321 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

دعو الباحثين والخبراء والمهتمين إلى المشاركة في العدد الخامس من مجلة متقن، والذي يأتي في محور: *الثقة بالذات* نرحّب بالمقالات التي تتناول هذا المحور من زواياه المختلفة؛ بما يجمع بين التحليل والتطبيق، ويسهم في إثراء النقاش حول بناء الثقة بالذات وترميمها، وفهم تشوهاتها تحت ضغط المقارنة والاستهلاك، وفي سياقات الأسرة والعمل والتعليم والهوية.. 📆 آخر موعد لاستقبال المقالات: 17 / 7 / 2026 📨 ترسل المشاركات عبر البريد: bawa

Signed د. عبد الرحمن الجابر

30 Jun 2026, 16:14 UTC376 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

في السابق، كان ما يكتسبه الإنسان من معارف خلال سنوات الدراسة كافيًا لأن يخدمه لسنوات طويلة في مسيرته المهنية. أما اليوم، فقد أصبحت المعرفة سريعة التقادم، بل إن كثيرًا من المهارات التي يتطلبها سوق العمل الآن لم تكن مطروحة أصلًا قبل أعوام قليلة. لذلك لم يعد التحدي الحقيقي مقتصرًا على نيل التعليم، وإنما في القدرة على مواصلة التعلم وعدم التوقف عند حد معين. ومن أكبر الأخطاء في هذا العصر أن يظن الإنسان أن مرحلة التعلم أ

1

Signed د. عبد الرحمن الجابر

26 Jun 2026, 16:31 UTC387 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

يُرهق كثيرٌ من الشباب أنفسهم حين يزنون حياتهم بمقاييس لا تلائم ظروفهم، أو حين يقارنون بداياتهم بمراحل ناضجة في حياة غيرهم. ويبدأ النضج الحقيقي عندما يعي الإنسان أن له طريقه الخاص، وأن قيمة المرء لا تُقاس بسرعة الوصول، بل بصدق السعي واستمرار التقدّم. ليس لازمًا أن يسلك الناس الطريق ذاته، ولا أن يبلغوا المنجزات نفسها في العمر نفسه؛ فلكل إنسان ظروفه الخاصة، وتحدياته المختلفة، والفرص التي تتاح له في وقتها. وما يحتاجه

💯4

Signed د. عبد الرحمن الجابر

23 Jun 2026, 18:25 UTC447 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

Signed د. عبد الرحمن الجابر

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dr_aljaber. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,060,622 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“قناة د. عبدالرحمن الجابر” (@dr_aljaber), 1,276 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dr_aljaber.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.