Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

إيوان الحنابلة | أحمد باقيس

@Alhanabla

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,497subscribers

+89 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001175288178
TypeChannel
Username@Alhanabla
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Alhanabla

Growth

11,40811,49711,452.56 August 2026 — 11,408 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,408 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,416 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,436 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,449 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,460 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,477 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,488 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,497 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +89. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,395–11,510 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:3511,497+9
12 Aug 2026, 10:1511,488+11
11 Aug 2026, 12:5811,477+17
10 Aug 2026, 13:5111,460+11
9 Aug 2026, 10:3711,449+13
8 Aug 2026, 10:5111,436+20
7 Aug 2026, 09:0511,416+8
6 Aug 2026, 06:3111,408no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:2211,408first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 5 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.2%
avg views ÷ 11,497 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,900
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
18
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held22 (5 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total52,160
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 04:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 50s
Average length
9m 50s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 21:53 UTC≈1,050 viewsread 13 August 2026

🌿 حكم حضور المسجد لشارب الدخان: في دليل الطالب: " وكره لمن أكل بصلاً أو فجلاً ونحوه حضور المسجد " - قال العلّامة العوفي في شرحه مسلك الراغب (١/٣٧٠) " مالم يذهب ريحه، للخبر الوارد في ذلك، قلتُ: وكذا شرب دخان " - وقال العلّامة مرعي قبله في رسالته تحقيق البرهان صـ١١٣ " وهذه العلة - أي: التأذي بالرائحة النتنة في الثوم والبصل - موجودةٌ في الدخان بعينه، بل هو أفحشُ رائحةً " - ونقل العلّامة المنقور في الفواكه العديدة (٢/٧٩

7 Aug 2026, 22:13 UTC≈4,060 viewsread 13 August 2026
File

لمحبكم: " الثبات على الكتاب عند سيل المشغلات "

2 Aug 2026, 00:47 UTC≈2,760 viewsread 13 August 2026

🌿 " فجمالُ المعاني المدركة بالعقل والبصيرة أعظم من جمال الصورة الظاهرة للأبصار ، فتكون لذة القلوب بما تدركه من الأمور الشريفة التي تجلُّ عن أن تدركها الحواس أتمَّ وأبلغ " السفاريني - البحور الزاخرة ٣/١٥٤٤ وقبله قال ابن القيم " لو صوِّر العلم صورة = لكانت أجمل من صورة الشمس والقمر " روضة المحبين صـ ٢٠١ قناة📕: https://t.me/Alhanabla

1 Aug 2026, 00:58 UTC≈3,070 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

وحين تركَ الحافظ المقدسي في كتابه ( فضائل الأعمال ) ما ورد في السواك تألّمَ السفاريني من ذلك وكتب هذه القطعة الجميلة . ( تناضل العمّال ١٢٩ / ١ )

1 Aug 2026, 00:53 UTC≈2,380 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

الحافظ ابن الملقن بعد أن خرّج أكثر من مئة حديث في السواك قال : البدر المنير ٢/٦٨

29 Jul 2026, 21:21 UTC≈2,400 viewsread 13 August 2026

🌿 الإمام العلامة المحقق شيخ المذهب المرداوي الحنبلي (ت:٨٨٥) نقل عن الإمام العلامة السيوطي (ت:٩١١) في موسوعته ( التحبير ) في خمس مواضع ووصفه بقوله: ‏" ثمّ ظفرتُ بتصنيف لعلامة زمانه الشيخ جلال الدين عبدالرحمن بن السيوطي ناظم جمع الجوامع " ‏- والمرداوي أسنّ من السيوطي بـ ٣٢ عامًا ! ‏فانظر لأدب العلم عند العلماء، وكيف أن العلم يُؤدب أهله، وانظر إلى قلّة أدب بعض المُتصدّرين [ اليوتيوبر ] مع العلّامة السيوطي! قناة📕: http

29 Jul 2026, 21:18 UTC≈2,180 viewsread 13 August 2026

🌿 نقل الإمام السّفاريني كلامًا للإمام السيوطي واستحسنه ثم قال " فكلام الحافظ جلال الدين السيوطي غير مطروح، ونقله غير مجروح، فهو الحافظ المتقن، والحجة المتفنن " الأجوبة الـنجدية صـ٨٠ قناة📕: https://t.me/Alhanabla

29 Jul 2026, 21:17 UTC≈1,980 viewsread 13 August 2026
File

" النصوص الحنبلية في الثناء على الإمام أبي حنيفة " هذا المقال سبق أن نشرته ، وكنتُ قد جمعتُ ما وقفتُ عليه من نصوص السّادة الحنابلة في الثناء على الإمام أبي حنيـفة، وزدتُ عليه الآن ما وقفتُ من نصوصٍ أخرى في الثناء على الإمام .

29 Jul 2026, 21:16 UTC≈1,990 viewsread 13 August 2026
File

مكانة الإمام النووي عند السّادة الحنابلة إلماحة يسيرة لمكانته .

29 Jul 2026, 18:44 UTC≈2,210 viewsread 13 August 2026

ومن تقريرات السفاريني: " توحيد الإلهيّة وهذا هو المقصود الأعظم، وهو قطب التوحيد، وهو الذي دعت إليه الرسل، ونزلتْ به الكتب، بل ما خَلَقَ الله سبحانه إلا لهذا التوحيد الذي هو توحيد الإلهية المتضمن توحيد الربوبية وهو عبادة الله وحده لا شريك له = فإن المشركين من العرب كان يقرون بتوحيد الربوبية " نتائج الأفكار شرح حديث سيد الاستغفار صـ٢٢٢ قناة📕: https://t.me/Alhanabla

29 Jul 2026, 18:38 UTC≈2,010 viewsread 13 August 2026

🌿 " وقد دخل كثيرٌ من أهل الإسلام في طرقٍ مُبتدعة يطولُ ذكرُها، وأخرجوا من التوحيد ما هو منه كتوحيد الألوهيّة، وإثبات حقائق أسماء الله وصفاته ولم يعرف كثير منهم من التوحيد إلا توحيد الربوبيَّة، وهو أنَّ الله ربُّ كلِّ شيءٍ وخالقُه، وهذا التوحيد كان يقرُّ به المشركون ! وإنما التوحيد الذي أمر اللهُ به العباد هو توحيد الألوهيَّة المتضمِّنُ لتوحيد الرُّبوبيَّة بأنْ يعتقد إثبات الله وصفاته، ويعبده ولا يشرك به شيئًا " الع

24 Jul 2026, 17:45 UTC≈2,870 viewsread 13 August 2026

" أصول الفقه: ما تُبنى عليه مسائل الفقه، لأن بها يُتوصل إلى العلم لا بغيرها، ولا يُمكن النظر فيها إلا بعد الرياضة الطويلة بفروع الفقه " الإمام ابن البنا الحنبلي - الخصال والعقود والأحوال والحدود صـ١٠٧ قناة📕: https://t.me/Alhanabla

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @Alhanabla. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Alhanabla edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 36,980 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

أخبار السعودية
@saudinews50 · 168,255
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“إيوان الحنابلة | أحمد باقيس” (@Alhanabla), 11,497 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Alhanabla.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.