Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 98 days, net +281. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,796–27,290 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 04:19
27,140
+39
10 Nov 2026, 07:37
27,101
+10
8 Nov 2026, 21:08
27,091
+34
7 Nov 2026, 11:07
27,057
-14
6 Nov 2026, 14:40
27,071
-6
5 Nov 2026, 17:18
27,077
+1
3 Nov 2026, 19:59
27,076
-2
2 Nov 2026, 16:19
27,078
+1
1 Nov 2026, 18:29
27,077
-2
31 Oct 2026, 18:20
27,079
-1
30 Oct 2026, 15:36
27,080
+2
29 Oct 2026, 16:39
27,078
+4
28 Oct 2026, 12:56
27,074
-11
27 Oct 2026, 12:49
27,085
-11
26 Oct 2026, 15:27
27,096
-3
25 Oct 2026, 17:51
27,099
-5
24 Oct 2026, 15:08
27,104
-4
23 Oct 2026, 15:51
27,108
-1
22 Oct 2026, 13:17
27,109
-12
21 Oct 2026, 04:38
27,121
first reading
Engagement
36 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 154 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.4%
avg views ÷ 27,140 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,460
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 36 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
36 (22 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
71,350
Reactions total
2,288
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 16:43 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
691
Videos
100
Links
298
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
5,311 reactions across 36 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,890
73.2%
👍
366
6.89%
😢
276
5.20%
💔
174
3.28%
👌
132
2.49%
👏
113
2.13%
🕊
106
2.00%
😭
78
1.47%
🔥
67
1.26%
😍
53
0.998%
🤔
25
0.471%
🤩
21
0.395%
🤯
7
0.132%
😁
3
0.056%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,311 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
82
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 36 we hold a reading for · 28%
Most on one post
68
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Ali_Hawwa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 36 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 16 posts held from the last 30 days (6.25%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
••
•| رسالة مُحوَّلة |•
أرسل إليّ صاحبٌ لقطةً من محادثةٍ خاصة بينه وبين ثالث، يستشهد بها على موقفٍ له، فوجدت نفسي أقرأ كلامًا لم يُكتب لي، ولم يأذن صاحبه أن أراه. وبعد أيام وصلني تسجيلٌ صوتي «مُعاد توجيهه»، فسمعت رجلًا لا أعرفه يضحك ثم يتنهد ثم يقول كلامًا ما كان ليقوله لو علم أني أسمعه. وتوقفت ثم رأيت أن الأمر أكبر من لقطةٍ أو تسجيل، فرجعت إلى ما ورد فيه.
روى جابر رضي الله عنه أن النبي صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم قال:…
مباركٌ للشيخ الغالي والصاحب الكريم أ. بدر آل مرعي هذا التوأم العلمي المبارك، وإنّ من جميل ما يُفرح به المرء أن يرى ثمار العلم تتوالى، ومواليد الأقلام تتعاقب، وأن يشهد امتداد أثر أهل العلم وتجدد عطائهم.
••
قال الربيع بن سليمان: «كان الشافعي قد جزأ الليل ثلاثة أجزاء، الثلث الأول يكتب، والثلث الثاني يصلي، والثلث الثالث ينام»[١].
ولو قسمنا ليالينا نحن اليوم لوجدناها أثلاثًا كذلك: ثلثٌ في المقاطع، وثلثٌ في المحادثات، وثلثٌ في النوم. القسمة واحدة في عددها، وبيننا وبينه ما بين الشافعي وقوم يقرؤون سيرته ثم ينامون.
________
[١] حلية الأولياء لأبي نعيم ٩/١٣٥.
••
••
•| المنحنى كله لا نقطته |•
﴿وَتِلْكَ الْأَيَّامُ نُدَاوِلُهَا بَيْنَ النَّاسِ﴾ [آل عمران: 140]. من نظر إلى النقطة التي يقف عليها الآن ظنّ الخطّ مستقيمًا إلى الهاوية أو إلى القمة. والتاريخ منحنى، وقراءة اللحظة بمعزل عن المنحنى تجعل كل صاعد يبدو خالدًا وكل هابط يبدو ختامًا.
••
••
•| سمرٌ بلا سُمّار |•
أكتب هذه الكلمات عند منتصف الليل، وأنت تقرؤها في الساعة نفسها، فنحن شريكان فيما سأتحدث عنه. وقد عدت إلى كتب السلف أبحث عن السهر، فوجدت ما جعلني أراجع كثيرًا من ليالينا.
روى إسماعيل القاضي عن خرشة بن الحرّ قال: «رأيت عمر بن الخطاب يضرب الناس على الحديث بعد العشاء ويقول: أسمرًا أول الليل ونومًا آخره؟»[١]. وذكر ابن بطّال عن سلمان الفارسي قوله: «إياكم وسمر أول الليل، فإنه مهدمة لآخره». ثم استثن…
••
﴿وَأَنَّهُ هُوَ أَضْحَكَ وَأَبْكَىٰ﴾ [النجم: ٤٣]. نسب الله إلى نفسه سبحانه ضحكتك كما نسب دمعتك. فما فرحت به هبةٌ تُشكر، وما بكيت منه قدرٌ يُرضى به. ومن عرف مصدر الحالين لم يطغَ في الأولى ولم ينكسر في الثانية.
••
••
بيتي، أرضي، رصيدي… كل ياءٍ تُلحقها بشيء حقيبةٌ تُضاف إلى أمتعتك. وفي المطار يخرج صاحب الحقيبة الصغيرة أولًا، ويبقى أصحاب الحقائب الكبيرة أمام السير ينتظرون. وكذلك الخروج من الدنيا: أقلّ الناس ياءاتٍ أسرعهم عبورًا.
••
••
•| حمّى الرأي |•
تقع حادثة، فتقرأ في ساعةٍ واحدة مئة رأيٍ قاطع في السياسة والطب والاقتصاد والفتوى. وقد قال الله تعالى: ﴿وَلَا تَقْفُ مَا لَيْسَ لَكَ بِهِ عِلْمٌ ۚ إِنَّ السَّمْعَ وَالْبَصَرَ وَالْفُؤَادَ كُلُّ أُولَٰئِكَ كَانَ عَنْهُ مَسْئُولًا﴾ [الإسراء: 36]. سمّها إن شئت: حمّى الرأي؛ ترتفع بها حرارة الناس في كل حادثة، ثم تنخفض ولم يُشفَ بها أحد. والمفارقةٌ العجيبة: حين تجفّ منابع العلم، تفيض أنهار الجزم.
••
••
لماذا نتابع الأخبار؟
ماذا تصنع حين تستيقظ؟ أغلب الظن أنك تمدّ يدك إلى الهاتف قبل أن تمدّها إلى الماء، لترى ما الذي حدث في العالم وأنت نائم، وأنا أفعل ذلك أيضًا، ولا أزعم أني خيرٌ منك فيه. وقد بحث ابن حزم (ت 456هـ) عن غرضٍ يتفق عليه الناس جميعًا، فلم يجد إلا واحدًا: طرد الهم(١). ثم مضى يعدّد: المال يطرد همّ الفقر، والصيت يطرد همّ استعلاء الآخرين، ثم قال: «وإنما هشّ إلى سماع الأخبار ومحادثة الناس من يطلب ذلك ليطرد …
❤117👏14👍13👌7🕊3🤔1😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @Ali_Hawwa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 70 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
القناة الرسمية للشيخ هاني حلمي @hanyhilmy · 23,569 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 September 2026
نصائح في التربية @Thamar18 · 54,332 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
التزكية @ALTazkiah · 21,759 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 September 2026
منصت الوحي - الختمة الصوتية للقرآن @monsit3 · 30,869 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 7 September 2026
ياسر الحزيمي 🎙 @ybh_100 · 94,130 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 August 2026
طرق إبداعية لحفظ القرآن الكريم @quranlearningcourse · 64,885 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
د. عبدالله بن بلقاسم @bilgasem · 25,442 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 September 2026
يتدارسونه @yatadarasonah · 32,932 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
مَوَاعِظُ اِبْنِ الْجَوْزِيِّ @Ibn_Aljuzi · 37,516 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 31 August 2026
قناة هَنَــــاء الماضي @Hanaa577 · 29,343 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 8 September 2026
منصت @monsit · 35,014 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 September 2026
دورات المدربة آسية الحربي @ha13ii · 29,542 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 8 September 2026
فِطرَة @fetra20 · 50,320 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 25 August 2026
بالقُرآنِ نَحيا @quraanna7ya · 31,875 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 5 September 2026
سَرَب @i_Sarab4 · 21,610 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 September 2026
كوثر الجمعة @Kawtharaljumah · 21,710 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 September 2026
اقتباسات @eqtipasat · 22,707 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 17 September 2026
حُبَابَة• @Hobaba7 · 61,317 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 August 2026
فضاء | S P A C E @spacemec · 111,219 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 August 2026
شِـفَـاء ❤️🩹 @shffaaaaa · 25,036 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 30 September 2026
تَدْرُسُون- د-شَيْمَاءمِشْرِف @drShayma_qus · 25,938 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
د. عقيل سالم الشمري @tadabr2 · 31,420 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 6 September 2026
قناة طلال الحسّان. @t_hssan · 35,708 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 3 September 2026
قَبَسٌ• @qabs97 · 35,428 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 95 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة | علي آل حوّاء” (@Ali_Hawwa), 27,140 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ali_Hawwa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
