*حين يستحي الله تعالى من عبده* في مواقف منثورة في الحياة في البيع والشراء في السفر في التعاملات حاجز يحجزك عن أخذ حقك أو استيفاء نصيبك يقال لم لم تفعل؟ لماذا لم تتصل؟ كان في وسعك أن تطلب مواقف صغيرة كثيفة في الحياة تتخطاها في كل مرة كنت تريد من المطعم شيئا لكن ..... كنت تريد من الفندق أمرا كنت تريد أن تطلب من المضيف في الطائرة حاجة كنت ترغب من المكتب الذي تتعامل معه ودفعت أجره تسريع الخدمة حتى من يعمل عندك ....هناك…

Channel
قناة فقهية
@dr_alghfaily
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,958subscribers
-23 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001017417710 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dr_alghfaily |
| Created | 8 January 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dr_alghfaily |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “قناة د.عبدالله بن منصور الغفيلي” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 01:41 | 7,958 | -7 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 16:38 | 7,965 | -1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 15:36 | 7,966 | -21 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:03 | 7,987 | +4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 7,983 | +5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 7,978 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:09 | 7,980 | -7 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 7,987 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 06:12 | 7,988 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 7,990 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:35 | 7,991 | +8 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:21 | 7,983 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:20 | 7,985 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 7,981 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 7,981 | first reading |
Engagement
42 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.61%
- avg views ÷ 7,958 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 446
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 6
- of 42 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 42 (9 July 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,678 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 28m 02s
- Average length
- 4m 00s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
⌑ العنوان: تقسيط الزكاة على الفقير ⌑ المؤلف: مها الداغري #باب_الزكاة
⌑ العنوان ضوابط تغيير الخلقة للزينة في الفقه الإسلامي وتطبيقاتها المعاصرة (زراعة الوجه، وتحديد الحواجب بالشفرات الدقيقة) أنموذجًا ⌑ المؤلف: عهد الفايدي #باب_اللباس_والزينة
Photo, posted without a caption
https://x.com/ghofailylaw/status/2091457556258390290?s=46&t=bBj27CZJzjJPJhKej1pMNw
📚 خدمة نوعية للباحثين وطلبة العلم جرّب المساعد الذكي لتطبيق *تراث* المعتمد على أمهات كتب التراث والعلوم الإسلامية. 🔹 أبرز المزايا: - إجابات دقيقة وموثقة بعزو مباشر للمصادر والكتب التراثية. - تسهيل وتيسير البحث العلمي والمسائل الفقهية والشرعية. - عرض النصوص، والتفاسير، وشروح الأحاديث بسهولة. 🌐 للدخول عبر المتصفح (الكمبيوتر والجوال): https://app.turath.io/ 📲 لتحميل التطبيق على الهواتف الذكية: - متجر أبل (App Store)…
Video, posted without a caption
🗓️ فوائد من مادة التأصيل القضائي ⚖️ برنامج التأسيس الفقهي للقانونيين ⚖️ 🔹 فائدة💡 ••┈┈┈ 🔸⇕ 🔸┈┈┈┈•• 💡 المجتمع الخاص بالبرنامج عبر واتس آب https://chat.whatsapp.com/GcjL5Hzh6DOFlbF9frESX2 💡 القناة الرسمية على التليجرام https://t.me/tasis4qanun 📲 للدعم التعليمي والتقني: https://wa.me/message/4IDYXNUAPONMJ1?src=qr #منصة_التبيان
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
خطبة الجمعة || بعنوان (الميراث المحمدي). لفضيلة الشيخ/ ناصر بن سعد العصفور حفظه الله https://youtu.be/NwHOKY7jfbI?si=Tg11HI6dtG5mIG8U
Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @dr_alghfaily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@AltebiyanCourses · 5,5182 postsد. عبدالله بن بلقاسم
@bilgasem · 25,0352 postsالمكتبة العلمية للنوازل الفقهية
@nawazil_lib · 5,2412 postsالتأسيس الفقهي للقانونيين
@tasis4qanun · 5,4332 postsقناة عبدالرحمن السديس
@assdais · 23,3871 postقناة إبراهيم المديهش العلمية
@ibrahim_almdehesh · 22,8521 post•|| تلاوات خاشعة Quran ||•
@tvquran · 27,2041 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@axxxxa140 · 68,752
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 August 2026
@fiiqh · 28,934
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 September 2026
@binothaimeen · 40,027
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 30 August 2026
@eqtipasat · 23,820
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 17 September 2026
@tashweeqatquran · 44,443
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
@kfayat2018 · 202,293
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 21 August 2026
@quran1tv · 41,078
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 August 2026
@assdais · 23,387
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
@Dralderes · 37,033
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 1 September 2026
@khlodalotibi · 34,185
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 4 September 2026
@ybh_100 · 94,777
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 August 2026
@bilgasem · 25,035
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 September 2026
@ask_albaydha · 33,080
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 September 2026
@binbaz1420 · 32,534
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 5 September 2026
@alkhalil_1 · 34,819
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
@ibrahim_almdehesh · 22,852
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 September 2026
@Thirty_s30 · 28,140
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 September 2026
@drr_altarefe · 29,279
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 September 2026
@M_shangiti · 31,005
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 6 September 2026
@klaw0 · 39,599
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 September 2026
@Quransr · 155,376
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 12 August 2026
@twjehdm · 36,878
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
@Algoayme · 44,732
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
@al_khotab · 32,688
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 60 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة فقهية” (@dr_alghfaily), 7,958 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dr_alghfaily.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.