Channel
@fegh_alnafs
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
15,442subscribers
+37 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001370504184 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fegh_alnafs |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fegh_alnafs |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 15,442 | +6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 15,436 | +7 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:06 | 15,429 | +16 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:58 | 15,413 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 15,411 | +5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:32 | 15,406 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 15,405 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:50 | 15,401 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 15,405 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (29 June 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 71,080 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
من مداخل الشيطان، التعلق بالأسباب. "فإذا وجد السبب اغتر المرء وظن أن المراد لا بد حاصل، وإذا انعدم السبب، يئس وجزع وانقطع رجاؤه. والحق أن الأسباب لا تستقل بشيء.. فالله هو مسبب الأسباب، ومجريها، وبيده حصول النتائج، إن شاء أجراها بأسبابها، وإن شاء أوجدها من حيث لا نحتسب، وبغير الأسباب التي نظنها لازمة. السبب يُفعل ويُؤخذ به، لكن التوكل على الله والإيمان بقدرته أهم من جميع الأسباب".
من أدق صور ضعف الإنسان: عدم إمرته على شعوره، فهو لا يملك خيار محبة شيء أو كرهه أو فك التعلق به، بالإضافة إلى ضعف سيطرته على تقلب المزاج حيث إنه أمرٌ تبعٌ للظروف! إلا إذا أذن الله بذلك! وقد أشار الله في محكم تنزيله إلى مثل هذا في قوله: (ولمَّا سَكَتَ عنْ مُوسَى الغَضَبُ)، فقد كان الغضب بمثابة السلطان الآمر الناهي على موسى عليه السلام! (وخلق الإنسان ضعيفاً).
قد يبتليك الله بإيداع الرغبة فيك تجاه شيء، ثم يمنعه عنك أو ينزعه منك، أو يبتليك بكره شيء ثم يقربه إليك، وهذه الرغبة والكراهة هما المحك لاختبار قلب العبد في الصبر والرضا، ولك في قصة أصحاب السبت المثل!
سألت أحد الأصدقاء وهو طبيب نفسي حاذق، قلت له: أنتم كغيركم قد تمرّون بعوارض نفسية ومصاعب، عندما يمرّ بك شيء من ذلك هل تُشخِّص نفسك؟ قال: لا، ولكن أعرض نفسي على أحد الزملاء. وهذا الذي قاله هو عين العقل والحكمة، وقد قال الشاعر: شاوِر سِواكَ إِذا نابَتكَ نائِبَةٌ يَومًا وَإِن كُنتَ مِن أَهلِ المَشوراتِ فَالعَينُ تَنْظُرُ مِنْها ما نَأىٰ وَدَنا وَلا تَرى نَفْسَها إِلّا بِمِرآةِ د.بندر الشراري
"يفوت من يبهره اتّزانك كم أرضًا ملغومة وطأت، وكم خسرت لتظفر، وكم بذلت منك لتعود لمسارك الظاهر له، يفوته أن لِمَا استملح منك تكلفة دفعتها من روحك ورواحك حتّى تقف منتصب القامة، خفيف النفس، ثابت المبدأ، جسور الرأي، واضح المقصد، رحيم الروح، وأنك ما بلغت كل هذا إلا بلطف الله بك".
معظم الأقوام بمختلف العصور طالبوا الأنبياء بالمعجزات، بينما عبدوا الأصنام ولم يطالبوها بأدنى معجزة أو دليل مع جمودها وعدم نفعها. ويتجلى بذلك هوى النفس، وازدواجية المعايير في تقبل الشيء ورفضه.
مواقف الشخص وطفولته وأفراحه وأتراحه وبيئته، هي العدسة التي يرى بها الحياة، ويحكم من خلالها على الآخرين، وتتلوث هذه العدسة أو تسطع بحسب جودة المعطيات السابقة، إلا إن نقاها وأزال شوائبها بالعلم والمعرفة والتزكية!
من أحذق القوانين في العلاقات مقولة :«لا تصاحب إلا من له دين يردعه، أو عقل يمنعه، أو مروءة ترفعه».
"الكلام المطرب هو كلُّ قول جلب أُنساً، أو فسَّر حالاً، وأضاء فهماً، ووسَّع بالحُسن خاطراً، وأهمى بالنَّفائس ماطراً، واستدعى القُلوب إلى مراتعِه، وتنزَّهت الأبصار في مواضعه، واخضرَّت بالآداب فروع تأليفه، وتمايلت النُفوس من أوتار تشنِيفِه".
كل ركون إلى جدار بشري هو سقوط مؤجل، إما بتغير أو فقد أو مفارقة، فخفف استنادك! ويبقى الركون إلى الله هو الحبل المتين والعروة الوثقى التي لا انفصام لها.
اعلم أن ما تتمناه، ليس بهذا اللمعان عندما تصله!
"يا عُمَر .. إنَّهُ شَهد بَدْرًا". "إذا زلَّت قدم أخيك ففتّش عن معروفٍ سابقٍ له، ففي حياة كلِّ واحدٍ منّا -بدر- تغفر له".
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @fegh_alnafs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@fegh_alnafs edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 147,151 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فقه النَّفْس📚” (@fegh_alnafs), 15,442 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fegh_alnafs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.