Channel
@h_alarwan
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
18,122subscribers
+913 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001047824950 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @h_alarwan |
| Description | قناة علمية، دعوية، تربوية |
| Created | 29 March 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/h_alarwan |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @h_alarwan/9118 · this entry10 Nov 2026, 02:50 UTC | @bawh_alruwh/1232910 Nov 2026, 04:03 UTC | 1.00 | 72 minutes |
| @h_alarwan/8797 · this entry2 Sept 2026, 10:36 UTC | @bawh_alruwh/116963 Sept 2026, 02:59 UTC | 0.94 | 16 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @bawh_alruwh | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.99 | 16 hours | this entry (5–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 129 comparable posts for this entry, running 30 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 15 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Nov 2026, 22:19 | 18,122 | +25 |
| 11 Nov 2026, 22:06 | 18,097 | +12 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 02:31 | 18,085 | +17 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 14:10 | 18,068 | +29 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 11:25 | 18,039 | +64 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 09:55 | 17,975 | -4 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 08:40 | 17,979 | -3 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 06:20 | 17,982 | +25 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:01 | 17,957 | +29 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 10:06 | 17,928 | -7 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 06:54 | 17,935 | +7 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 03:36 | 17,928 | +6 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 00:45 | 17,922 | +13 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 22:46 | 17,909 | +18 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 21:46 | 17,891 | +27 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 23:47 | 17,864 | +4 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 02:44 | 17,860 | +26 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 03:05 | 17,834 | +35 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 05:09 | 17,799 | +2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 07:56 | 17,797 | first reading |
155 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 94 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 155 (30 July 2026 – 15 November 2026) |
| Views total | 130,213 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Nov 2026, 12:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 53 posts held from the last 30 days (3.77%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
عدو البلاء. قال ابن القيم -رحمه الله-: (والدعاء من أنفع الأدوية، وهو عدو البلاء، يدافعه ويعالجه، ويمنع نزوله، ويرفعه، أو يخففه إذا نزل. وهو سلاح المؤمن). الداء والدواء (ص١١). https://t.me/h_alarwan
الصدقة دليل يقينٍ وحُسن ظنٍّ بالله؛ قال تعالى : ﴿لن تنالوا البرَّ حتى تُنفقوا مما تُحبون﴾. وقال ﷺ: «الصدقة تُطفئ الخطيئة كما يُطفئ الماءُ النار». فما أعظم أجرها، وما أوسع أثرها في الدنيا والآخرة .
" مافيه مثل العافية ستر وغناة إن جات للمسلم تراها كافية كم واحد يطلب ملذات الحياة وإذا مرض ما يطلب إلا العافية ". https://t.me/h_alarwan
يُروى عن عليٍّ رضي الله عنه أنه قال: «الفرص تمرُّ مرَّ السحاب، فانتهزوا فرص الخير». فإن مواسم الخير سريعة الانقضاء، والعاقل من بادر إليها قبل فواتها؛ فكم من فرصةٍ تمنّى المرء عودتها، وهيهات أن تعود! وأعظم الفُرَص : هذه الحياة التي نعيشها ! https://t.me/h_alarwan
لا يخلو المرء من همٍّ، ولكنّ الشقاء ليس في وجود الهموم دائمًا، بل في استدامة استحضارها؛ فمن الناس من يُطيل الوقوف عند همّه حتى يألفه، ومنهم من يُحسن تجاوزه، فلا يمنحه من فكره أكثر مما يستحق، ويمضي مستعينًا بالله. https://t.me/h_alarwan
قد يعجز الداعي عن استحضار جميع حاجاته، أو تخونه العبارة عن التعبير عمّا في قلبه، فيخشى أن يفوته من الدعاء ما هو أحوج إليه؛ فعليه بجوامع الأدعية من الكتاب والسنة، ففيها من سعة الطلب ما يستوعب حاجاتٍ قد تخفى على الداعي نفسه. ومنها ما دعا به إبراهيم عليه السلام: ﴿ربنا إنك تعلم ما نُخفي وما نُعلن وما يخفى على الله من شيء في الأرض ولا في السماء﴾. قال السِّعدي -رحمه الله-: "أي: أنت أعلم بنا منا، فنسألك من تدبيرك وتربيتك…
مساهمتك في علاج هذه المرأة إعانةٌ لها على استعادة عافيتها، وحفظٌ لأسرةٍ تحتاج إلى وجودها؛ فأطفالها ينتظرونها، وقد اجتمع عليها ألم المرض وضيق الحاجة. فلا تبخلوا عليها بالعون، عسى الله أن يجعل في إحسانكم تفريجًا لكربتها. قال ﷺ: «واللهُ في عونِ العبدِ ما كان العبدُ في عونِ أخيه». 💡حالتها حرجة جدًا. https://lhum.sa/projects/821
من أسماء الله تعالى الحسنى: اللطيف، الحكيم، الخبير. فثق أن الله تعالى لطيف بك حين يصرف عنك أمرًا تعلّق به قلبك، وأن وراء صرفه حكمةً قد لا تدركها؛ فهو سبحانه أعلم بما يصلح لك، وما يصلحك. وما تراه في حياتك متشابكًا، وتراه في ذهنك معقّدًا، ليس خافيًا على الله تعالى، ولا خارجًا عن تدبيره وحكمته؛ فالأمور تجري بعلمه -سبحانه- الذي أحاط بكل شيء، وبحكمةٍ بالغة، ولطفٍ خفيّ. فأحسن الظن بربك، ليطمئن قلبك، قال الله تعالى: ﴿اللَّه…
[ أفكار للصدقة في الشتاء ] من أبواب الخير التي يتأكد الاحتياج إليها في الشتاء: • شراء البطانيات وتوزيعها على المحتاجين. • التصدق بفائض الملابس الشتوية، بعد تنظيفها والعناية بها. • شراء كسوة الشتاء لعمال النظافة والعمالة المحتاجة. • توفير السخانات والدفايات للأسر المحتاجة. • توزيع التمر وما يناسب الشتاء من الأطعمة على المحتاجين. • تخصيص يوم في الأسبوع للخروج مبكرًا، ومعك حافظات للشاي والحليب الدافئ، وبعض الخبز…
إذا عرض عليك أحدٌ خدمةً أو مساعدة، فاعتذرتَ بقولك: «لا»، وأردتَ أن تشكره وتدعو له، فانتبه إلى صياغة ردك. فلا تكتب: «لا جزاك الله خيرًا» أو «لا عافاك الله»؛ لأن النفي هنا يتصل بالدعاء، فينقلب المعنى إلى ضده. وإنما اكتب: «لا، وجزاك الله خيرًا» أو «لا، وعافاك الله»، فتجعل بينهما فاصلة. وإذا كان الرد مشافهةً، فقل: «لا، وجزاك الله خيرًا» أو «لا، وعافاك الله»، مع فصل النفي عن الدعاء في النطق. وهذا من باب الكمال في التع…
لا تغفل عن الفقراء، والمحتاجين في الشتاء . كان التابعي زبيد بن الحارث إذا كانت ليلة مطيرة، طاف على عجائز الحيّ ويقول: ألكم في السوق حاجة ؟ سير أعلام النبلاء ( ٥ / ٢٩٨ ). https://t.me/h_alarwan
قال الحافظ ابن حجر -رحمه الله-: " ينبغي لمن بلغه هذا الحديث أن يغتنم العمل به ويخلص نيته لربه ". معنى تعار : أي : انتبه من نومه . https://t.me/h_alarwan
Showing the 12 most recent of 155 posts we hold for @h_alarwan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@h_alarwan edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 32 posts on @h_alarwan as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 30 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 47 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة حَمَّاد العروان” (@h_alarwan), 18,122 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/h_alarwan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.