Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

최신특허 TV 공부방(김종승 변리사)

@recentpatent

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,565subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001671623260
TypeChannel
Username@recentpatent
Created20 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/recentpatent

Growth

2,5652,5692,5677 August 2026 — 2,569 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,569 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,568 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,565 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,564–2,570 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 10:342,565-3
8 Aug 2026, 08:182,568-1
7 Aug 2026, 15:012,569no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:552,569first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.21%
avg views ÷ 2,565 subscribers
Avg views / post
159
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held17 (4 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total2,707
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 05:29 UTC141 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ChosunCrypto1

김정관 장관 “반도체 성과급, 주총 승인 받도록”…상법·자본시장법 개정 시사 https://m.etoday.co.kr/news/view/2611754

Signed Jongseung Kim

6 Aug 2026, 04:27 UTC140 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @corevalue

https://naver.me/5hobYYFx ETF, 부동산, 보완수사권 총체적 난국

Signed Jongseung Kim

6 Aug 2026, 04:19 UTC160 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ym_research

이제 슬슬 어느정도 액션은 보여줘야.. 타이밍이 중요한데 파티 다 끝나고 불꺼졌는데 혼자 촛불들고 나오면 아무 의미도 없습니다. 닉스에 시총 밀렸다고 발끈해서 보도자료 낼게 아니라 이럴때 보여주셔야 1등기업이라고 인정하죠..

Signed Jongseung Kim

5 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC249 viewsread 7 August 2026

🔔 🇯🇵 니토보(니토방적)(3110) 신규 공시 📊 결산발표(단신) | 2026-08-05 15:30:00 2027年3月期 第1四半期決算短信〔日本基準〕(連結) · 2026년 4~6월 매출은 340억3,300만엔(+20.6%), 영업이익 79억4,300만엔(+84.8%), 순이익 57억9,700만엔(+84.2%)이다. · AI 서버 수요로 전자재료 매출이 145억8,900만엔(+29.5%), 영업이익이 70억3,600만엔(+70.0%)을 기록했다. · 통기 전망은 매출 1,410억엔(+19.3%), 영업이익 300억엔(+44.1%)으로 수정했으며, 분할 후 연간 배당 전망 28엔은 유지했다. · 이번 공시는 1분기 실적과 함께 통기 실적 전망 수정을 알린다는 점이 중요하다. https://www.release.tdnet.info/inbs/14

Signed Jongseung Kim

5 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC221 viewsread 7 August 2026

🏆 AI 밸류체인 시총 랭킹 2026-08-05 10:15 KST · 기준 1위: NVIDIA $5.13T [하이퍼스케일러] 2. Alphabet — $4.62T [+1.8%] █████████░ 90.0% 🔺+3.6%p 3. Microsoft — $3.66T [+1.8%] ███████░░░ 71.3% 🔺+0.4%p 4. Amazon — $2.99T [-0.8%] ██████░░░░ 58.3% 🔺+4.7%p 7. Meta — $1.50T [-0.2%] ███░░░░░░░ 29.2% 🔺+0.1%p 16. Oracle — $420B [+2.2%] █░░░░░░░░░ 8.2% 🔺+0.4%p (순위 ▲1) [AI반도체] 1. NVIDIA — $5.13T [+2.5%] ████████

Signed Jongseung Kim

5 Aug 2026, 04:37 UTC176 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @seokhongJJ

○ SpaceX (SPCX) 26년 2Q 실적 中 "메모리", AI컴퓨팅 업황 관련 주요 코멘트 "로직이랑 메모리가 지금 어느 속도로 생산되고 있는지를 보셔야 해요. 이런 건 항상 제약 요인이 뭔지를 봐야 하거든요. 지금 제약 요인은 메모리입니다. 메모리 출하는 연간 20% 정도 늘고 있어요. 보통 같으면 성숙한 대형 산업치고는 환상적으로 빠른 겁니다. 근데 스스로 물어보세요. 수요가 연 20%씩 늘고 있나요? 아니죠. 수요는 연 200%, 어쩌면 그 이상 늘고 있습니다. 수요가 공급보다 훨씬 빠르게 늘어나면, 경제학원론상 가격은 오르지, 내려가지 않습니다." "AI 쪽은요, 업계가 점점 더 많은 컴퓨트 수요를 향해 돌진하고 있어요. Grok이 커지면서 생기는 자체 수요뿐 아니라, Google이나 Anthropic 같은 다른 선도 기업들의

Signed Jongseung Kim

4 Aug 2026, 16:14 UTC188 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @habit4117

금융위, ‘한국 증시 투자 부적격’ 블룸버그에 정면 반박…“근거 불분명” -금융위원회는 “한국이 글로벌 인공지능(AI) 시장의 대체 불가한 공급망이자 투자처로 부각되고 있다”며 “근거가 불분명한 수치에 기반해 투자 부적격 국가로 평가될 우려는 전혀 없다”고 밝혔다. https://naver.me/Gfrc0Q7r

Signed Jongseung Kim

4 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC120 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @knowledge_to_wealth

주가 누르기 방지법을 만들랬더니 주가 누르기 장려법을 가져온 재정경제부 이소영 의원(여당)의 글 공유합니다. ——————————————————————————- <‘주가누르기 방지법 정부안’ 비판> 이 법안을 처음 생각한 이유는, 똑같은 회사인데 비상장일 땐 상속증여세를 100원 내고 상장을 하면 20원-30원을 내는 우리 세법의 불공정을 바로잡고 공정과세를 하자는 것이었고, 동시에 대한민국의 많은 경영자들이 기업을 상장해서 다수 일반인의 투자를 유치해놓고도 자신의 개인세금을 아끼자고 주가를 낮게 유지하는 ‘대한민국 투자자라면 누구나 아는’ 비양심적 경영행태의 유인을 제거하고자 함이었다. 어제 처음 정부안을 보고는 온갖 나쁜 상상이 튀어 나왔으나, 감정을 배제하고 정부안의 문제점을 지적해보려 한다. 사실 문제점을 지적하는 게 무의미할

Signed Jongseung Kim

4 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC102 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @knowledge_to_wealthPhoto

주가 누르기 방지법 정부안 vs 이소영 의원안 비교

Signed Jongseung Kim

4 Aug 2026, 10:11 UTC197 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @DrDtechFile

📊 HBM4 가격은 왜 오를까? | DDR5부터 베이스 다이까지, 제조사의 계산법 ▶️ HBM4 가격의 하한은 제조원가가 아니라 같은 라인에서 포기하는 서버용 DDR5의 웨이퍼당 수익으로 결정된다는 판단 ▶️ HBM3e 가격을 100으로 둔 조건부 역산 — HBM4는 130 초과가 설명 가능하며, DDR5 부족 장기화와 초기 수율 지연 시 고성능 초기 계약은 140~150 시나리오 ▶️ HBM3는 같은 노드·용량의 DDR5보다 약 3배의 웨이퍼 생산능력을 점유하고, 12단 다이 수율이 개별 99%여도 모두 정상일 단순 확률은 88.6%에 그치는 구조 ▶️ 2026년 1분기 HBM의 웨이퍼당 산출 가치와 수익성이 서버용 64GB DDR5 RDIMM보다 낮아졌다는 분석 — 연간 HBM 계약과 급등한 범용 DRAM 가격 사이의 시차 부각

Signed Jongseung Kim

4 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC118 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @maddingStockPhoto

주도섹터 : 데이터센터 (데크크) 정부의 3대 메가 프로젝트 (AI뉴딜 정책) - 반도체, 로봇, 데이타센터 SK그룹 5GW GS그룹 2.4GW NAVER 1GW 데이터센터를 건설하는데 필요한 : 지엔씨에너지, SK이터닉스, OCI홀딩스, LS, SGC에너지 등등 지엔씨에너지 https://stockeasy.intellio.kr/share_chat/6a863b3e-21bc-4afd-9c99-f15cb1fe433e https://stockeasy.intellio.kr/stock-analysis/stock-info/119850 SK이터닉스 https://stockeasy.intellio.kr/share_chat/972e01cb-a5a8-48ce-8eec-19558ac4856e https://stockeasy.intellio.kr/stoc

Signed Jongseung Kim

4 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC116 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @maddingStockPhoto

NXT 괴리율 TOP 10 | 2026.08.03 20:00 기준 https://stockeasy.intellio.kr

Signed Jongseung Kim

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @recentpatent. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“최신특허 TV 공부방(김종승 변리사)” (@recentpatent), 2,565 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/recentpatent.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.