Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 한걸음_적자생존 기록실

Channel

한걸음_적자생존 기록실

@helpmeonestep

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

12,278subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001135600447
TypeChannel
Username@helpmeonestep
Created31 October 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/helpmeonestep

Growth

12,27512,29212,283.56 August 2026 — 12,292 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,292 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,288 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,287 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,290 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,288 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,285 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,281 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,275 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,278 subscribers12,2786 August 202616 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 10 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,272–12,295 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 02:3512,278+3
14 Aug 2026, 15:2712,275-6
13 Aug 2026, 07:4812,281-4
12 Aug 2026, 09:3612,285-3
11 Aug 2026, 08:2712,288-2
10 Aug 2026, 08:2412,290+3
8 Aug 2026, 10:0812,287-1
7 Aug 2026, 09:1712,288-4
6 Aug 2026, 10:0612,292no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:5312,292first reading

Engagement

46 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.3%
avg views ÷ 12,278 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,490
46 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
46
of 46 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held46 (30 July 202615 August 2026)
Views total114,664
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 04:55 UTC≈1,280 viewsread 15 August 2026

도달한 방식은 달랐지만 공통점. - 간절함과 인생을 걸고 들어옴. - 돈을 무심히 보는 힘. (하락시 기질) - 자기믿음 - 투자에 대한 즐거움 (돈보다 행위자체) - 자신의 종목으로 퀀텀점프 - 실천력(베팅)과 메타인지 당연해보이지만 당연하지 않은 것들. 나는 몇가지를 가지고 있을까. #알바트로스님 https://m.blog.naver.com/pillion21/224379394662

15 Aug 2026, 01:53 UTC≈1,250 viewsread 15 August 2026

분기 실적플레이가 어려워지는 시황 #김종호님 https://m.blog.naver.com/jk734/224379292237

14 Aug 2026, 02:12 UTC≈1,380 viewsread 15 August 2026

이번주 고민하던 부분들에 대한 일부 해답을 주는 글 #플래드낵님 https://m.blog.naver.com/mong4445/224378272190

13 Aug 2026, 22:32 UTC969 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @kkkontempPhoto

이번 랠리가 지속 가능한 구조를 갖춘 이유는 상반기 쏠림 현상 이후 시장 전반의 포지션 리셋이 이루어지면서, 투자할 수 있는 테마도 늘어나고 랠리가 넓게 확산하고 있기 때문 한층 더 이성적이고 합리적인 시장이 조성되고 있음 아시아 및 한국 테마 수익률 (최근 1개월 및 5일)

13 Aug 2026, 06:34 UTC≈1,510 viewsread 15 August 2026

인베스팅에 트레이딩을 병용시도 하는 과정에서 생기는 어려움. 공감. #리송님 https://m.blog.naver.com/leesongblog/224377478460

12 Aug 2026, 23:10 UTC≈1,090 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @shinhanconsumerPhoto

이 도표에서 가장 눈에 띄는 부분은 미국 스킨케어 시장에서 K-뷰티 브랜드가 소셜 미디어 영향력 기준으로 이미 메인스트림에 진입했다는 점입니다. Rhode가 EMV $61.1M으로 1위를 차지했지만, Medicube는 $53.6M으로 2위까지 올라섰습니다. 특히 Medicube의 Impressions는 554.8M으로 전체 1위로, 미국 시장에서의 디지털 노출 및 바이럴 파워가 상당히 강하다는 점이 확인됩니다. **Anua($28.5M), Laneige($22.3M)**까지 포함하면 Top 10 중 K-뷰티가 3개 브랜드입니다. 단순히 한국 브랜드가 일부 진입한 수준을 넘어, 미국 소비자의 소셜 미디어 기반 스킨케어 소비에서 K-뷰티가 하나의 주요 축으로 자리잡고 있다고 볼 수 있습니다. 특히 Medicube는 EMV보다 Impressi

12 Aug 2026, 23:10 UTC≈1,100 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @huhpharm

[키움 허혜민] 글로벌 제약사 2Q26 매출 호조, Top 25 중 16개사 연간 가이던스 상향 2Q26 글로벌 제약사 실적은 중국 경쟁, 특허만료, 약가 인하 등 우려에도 불구하고 전반적으로 강한 성장 기록. Top 25 제약사 중 9개사가 전년 대비 두 자릿수 매출 성장, 매출이 감소한 기업은 Teva(-1% 미만) 한 곳. 전분기 대비로는 Top 25 중 13개사가 두 자릿수 성장, Daiichi Sankyo(-2%)만 감소. 2Q25 당시 두 자릿수 QoQ 성장 기업이 5개였던 것과 비교해 업황 개선 뚜렷 실적 호조를 바탕으로 25개사 중 16개사가 2026년 매출 가이던스 상향 https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/biopharma-saw-q2-sales-boom-led-lilly-sanofi-reg

12 Aug 2026, 23:05 UTC≈1,160 viewsread 15 August 2026

기사 재밌게 잘 썼네요. https://biz.chosun.com/science-chosun/bio/2026/08/13/WQP4Q5HK4JAWHMT5C3G4P7JEZ4/?outputType=native

12 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC≈1,350 viewsread 15 August 2026

요즘 시황에서 곱씹어볼만한 글 #슈트님 https://m.blog.naver.com/whaazz/224364742809

12 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC≈1,150 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @maddingStock

📊 2026.08.12 어닝 서프라이즈 요약 총 15건 ------------------------------ 1. 한국콜마(161890) 영업익 708억 | 예상비 +11.8%, QoQ +38.1%, YoY +44.3% 공시: http://dart.fss.or.kr/api/link.jsp?rcpNo=20260812800079 2. 한국콜마(161890) 영업익 1,103억 | 예상비 +16.0%, QoQ +39.9%, YoY +50.2% 공시: http://dart.fss.or.kr/api/link.jsp?rcpNo=20260812800082 3. 미래에셋증권(006800) 영업익 24,899억 | 예상비 +30.4%, QoQ +81.1%, YoY +397.5% 공시: http://dart.fss.or.k

11 Aug 2026, 03:57 UTC≈1,760 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

역사적 평균보다는 여전히 훨씬 높지만 26년 3월말 수준으로 돌아온것만해도 개별주 플레이 하기엔 좋아진 환경 #KVIX

11 Aug 2026, 03:55 UTC≈1,470 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @globalmktinsightPhoto

시장 지표들(8/11) * 단일종목 레버리지 ETF [거래대금] - 지난 7월 31일 '예탁금 상향(1천 → 3천)' 조치 이후 거래대금 급감. 7월 31일 3.4조원에서 1조원대로 감소한 뒤, 8월 7일 상장이후 처음으로 1조원 미만인 9,490억원의 거래대금 기록. - 8월 10일 거래대금은 4,350억원으로 상장이후 최저 수준으로 떨어짐. [총운용자산] - 최근 4거래일(8월 5일~10일) 동안 약 1.2조 원 규모의 자금 순유출이 발생함. 그 동안 '간헐적' 자금 순유출은 있었지만, 지금과 같은 연속적이고 큰 규모는 상장이후 처음. - 예탁금 상향 조치 규제 시행 이후 약 1조원 정도 순유입되며 상장이후 누적 순유입액 17.2조원을 정점(Peak)으로 현재 16.0조원까지 감소함. - 반면 '삼전닉스' 주가 부진에 따른 누적평가손실

Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @helpmeonestep. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 180,639 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“한걸음_적자생존 기록실” (@helpmeonestep), 12,278 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/helpmeonestep.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.