Channel
@PlumeNetworkKR
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Declared links · Cite this entry
1,784subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002940362563 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PlumeNetworkKR |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PlumeNetworkKR |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:42 | 1,784 | -12 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 1,796 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:49 | 1,800 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (9 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,223 |
| Reactions total | 274 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 01:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
348 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 236 | 67.8% | |
| 👍 | 52 | 14.9% | |
| 🔥 | 33 | 9.48% | |
| 👏 | 19 | 5.46% | |
| 👌 | 8 | 2.30% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 348reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
'글로벌 RWA 플랫폼' 플룸, 美예탁원 토큰화증권 실무그룹 합류 플룸, 미국 DTCC 디지털자산솔루션 산업 워킹그룹에 참여 위킹그룹서 규제 준수 및 기록관리 분야 전문성 제공할 계획 DTCC 10월 토큰화서비스 출시, 적격증권 디지털버전 생성 글로벌 대표 실물자산(RWA) 토큰화 네트워크인 플룸(Plume)이 미국 증권예탁결제기관(DTCC)의 토큰화증권 준비를 위한 워킹그룹(실무팀)에 합류했다. 이를 통해 플룸은 찰스슈왑(Charles Schwab), 나스닥(Nasdaq), 알파카(Alpaca) 등 주요 금융기관들과 함께 토큰증권 시장 인프라 구축 논의에 참여하게 됐다. 플룸은 6일(현지시간) DTCC 디지털자산솔루션 산업 워킹그룹에 참여했다고 발표했다. 이 워킹그룹은 예탁결제회사(DTC)가 추진하는 토큰화 서비스의 운영 기준을 마련하…
❤14👍4👏1
🪶 플룸(Plume)은 DTCC의 디지털 자산 솔루션 산업 워킹 그룹(Digital Assets Solutions Industry Working Group)에 합류했습니다. 이 그룹에는 @CharlesSchwab, @AlpacaHQ, @Nasdaq 등 업계를 선도하는 기업들도 회원으로 참여하고 있습니다. 이 워킹 그룹은 DTCC 토큰화 서비스(DTCC Tokenization Service)에 대한 피드백을 제공하고, 디지털 자산의 폭넓은 채택을 이끌며 혁신을 촉진하기 위한 지속적이고 활발한 대화를 도모하기 위해 만들어졌습니다. @The_DTCC는 114조 달러가 넘는 자산에 대한 커스터디 및 자산 서비스를 제공하며, 글로벌 금융 서비스 산업의 최고 수준의 거래 후 시장 인프라 기업입니다. 저희는 이 이니셔티브에 기여하고, 디지털 자산 …
❤18👏2👍1
🪶CLARITY 법안이 다가오면서 디지털 자산 관련 입법의 향방에 이목이 집중되고 있습니다. 플룸(Plume)의 법률고문 살만 바나에이(Salman Banaei)가 @wrappedxyz에 출연해 이번 역사적 분기점이 갖는 의미를 논의할 예정이니 놓치지 마세요. 다음으로 12:25PM EST에 Block House에서 뵙겠습니다 세그먼트: Crypto Policy: What's Happening on the Hill 출연: ☑️케빈 위소키(Kevin Wysocki), Head of Policy, Anchorage Digital (@anchorage) ☑️ 살만 바나에이(Salman Banaei), General Counsel, Plume (@plumenetwork) ☑️ 윌 게인스(Will Gaines), Founder, Real Mot…
❤14👍3🔥3
🪶 Plume Vaults를 소개합니다. 그동안 저희가 만들어온 모든 것을 하나의 브랜드로 통합했습니다. ☑️총예치자산(TVL) 1억 7,800만 달러 ☑️누적 거래대금 7억 600만 달러 ☑️실물자산(RWA) 발행 19만 5천 건 기관 투자자들이 Plume Vaults를 신뢰하는 이유는 규제 요건을 뛰어넘는 수준을 갖추고 있기 때문입니다. SEC 등록 양도대리인(Transfer Agent) 자격과 버뮤다 통화청(BMA)의 Class M 디지털자산사업 라이선스 조건부 승인 역시 바로 이러한 이유로 획득할 수 있었습니다. 이러한 신뢰가 바로 업계를 선도하는 기업들이 Plume Vaults를 이용하는 이유입니다. Centrifuge를 통한 Apollo의 다각화된 크레딧 상품, Superstate의 핵심 전략, FalconX의 프라임 브로…
❤12👏2👍1
Channel photo updated
🪶 오픈 파이낸스가 왔습니다. Plume의 새로운 모습은 세계 최고 품질의 자산을 온체인으로 가져와, 기관과 전 세계 투자자들에게 개방하겠다는 동일한 신념을 담고 있습니다. 우리는 토큰화된 자산이 규모를 키우는 데 필요한 유통 레일(distribution rails)을 구축해 왔습니다. 이제는 오픈 파이낸스의 시간입니다. https://x.com/plumenetwork/status/2084658658693267785?s=20
❤14🔥4
🇺🇸 Q2 2026: Plume, 오픈 파이낸스에 다시 한번 승부수를 던지다 토큰화 시장에게 이번 분기 역시 놀라운 한 해였지만, 지난 분기보다는 좀 더 복잡한 양상을 띠었습니다. 온체인 자산에서 처음으로 수축세가 나타났고, 글로벌 AI 밈스톡과 STRC 등 온갖 종류의 주식들이 유례없이 빠른 사이클을 그렸으며, 규제 환경은 계속해서 문을 열어주고 있습니다. 업계는 성숙해가고 있고, 사용자와 자본은 이동하고 있으며, 그림은 점점 더 선명해지고 있습니다. 전체 토큰화 시장은 2026년 2분기에 13% 더 성장하며 340억 달러를 돌파했습니다 1년 전보다 5배 이상 성장한 수치입니다. 하지만 조금만 더 들여다보면 다른 이야기가 보입니다. 1분기의 30% 성장에 비하면 상당한 둔화이고, 원자재는 이번 분기 18% 하락하며 뒷걸음질친 반면…
❤12🔥5👍4
“RWA 성패는 유통과 규제…韓 우량자산, 글로벌 온체인 유통망에 실어야” 🇺🇸김수민 플룸 네트워크 한국 총괄 🔑 기사 요약 내용 시장 무게중심 이동 부동산·미술품처럼 스토리텔링은 쉽지만 현금흐름이 불분명한 자산 → 국채·채권처럼 이자 수익이 명확하고 담보·결제 활용도가 높은 금융상품으로 이동 중 한국이 주목받는 이유 우량자산(반도체·자동차·조선·방산) + 풍부한 자본 + 활발한 개인투자자 시장, 세 조건을 동시에 갖춘 보기 드문 국가로 평가. K팝 음원·음반 등 K콘텐츠 자산 투자 요청도 이어지는 중 국내 제도 현황 토큰증권 관련 전자증권법·자본시장법 개정안 → 올해 2월 공포, 내년 시행 예정 (시행령·감독규정은 정비 중) 스테이블코인 = RWA 거래 기본 인프라 결제 수단 없이는 RWA 상품도 무의미 → 스테이블코인 제도와 R…
❤9👍4🔥4
🇺🇸 플룸(Plume)의 기관 전용 볼트가 이제 LI.FI에서 이용 가능합니다. 앞으로 어떤 앱이나 지갑에서도 LiFi Earn을 연동해 원클릭 예치와 컴플라이언스 확인 기능을 갖춘 RWA 수익 상품을 제공할 수 있습니다. 사용자 접점은 더욱 다양해지지만, 자산이 운용되는 볼트는 Nest Credit을 통해 플룸(Plume) 네트워크에 안전하게 유지됩니다. https://x.com/plumenetwork/status/2081743264613560745?s=20
❤13👌2👍2
기관급 RWA(실물자산) 수익을 이제 Bybit에서 몇 번의 탭만으로 누릴 수 있습니다. 요건을 충족한 예치자는 DigiFT를 통해 PIMCO와 CMB International의 상품에서 수익을 얻을 수 있습니다. 글로벌 최대 자산운용사들과 동일한 수익 기회를 누릴 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 시작해보세요 https://bybit.com/en/earn/rwa
❤11🔥4👍3
Pendle에서 nOPAL 마켓이 성장하는 걸 보면, 디파이(DeFi) 시장이 온체인에서 양질의 실물자산(RWA) 수익률에 얼마나 목말라 있는지 알 수 있습니다 https://x.com/plumenetwork/status/2080042230778376550?s=20
❤12👍2👏1
🇺🇸 저희 CSO Shukyee Ma가 Money Frontier 2026 무대에 오릅니다. Forbes 선정 Web3 혁신 선구자(Web3 Innovation Pioneer)인 그녀는 Plume에서 글로벌 RWA(실물자산) 도입을 이끌며, 기관 자산을 조합 가능한 온체인 상품으로 전환하는 작업을 주도하고 있습니다. https://x.com/plumenetwork/status/2079981455330144578?s=20
❤12👍2👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PlumeNetworkKR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 822,396 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@PlumeNetworkKR named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
3 URLs this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Plume Network KR Official” (@PlumeNetworkKR), 1,784 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PlumeNetworkKR.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.