2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 571–573 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Aug 2026, 18:04
572
no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:51
572
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 9 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,410
Videos
≈21
Links
≈3,500
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1
50.0%
👍
1
50.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2025 to 18 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
☕ 아인이 시원한 아인 커피 100잔 쏩니다! ☕
7개 체인 상장 기념 + 여름맞이 감사 이벤트
무더위를 이겨내는 가장 쿨한 방법.
$AIN 커뮤니티와 함께하는 아이스 아메리카노 이벤트에 참여하세요
📅 이벤트 기간: 7월 16일(수) ~ 7월 25일(금)
📂 참여 방법
1)아인 커뮤니티에 “$AIN은 무더위도 뚫는다” 작성
2)친구를 텔레그램 채팅방에 초대하면 당첨 확률 UP!
3)구글폼 제출 — 이름, 텔레그램 ID, 친구 ID, 휴대폰 번호 입력
🎁 경품 안내
✔️ 추첨을 통해 총 100명에게 아이스 아메리카노 기프티콘 증정!
✔️당첨자는 이벤트 종료 후 3일 내 개별 연락 예정
💬 최근 $AIN 주요 소식
📢 $AIN, 7개 주요 DEX 상장 완료!
-Uniswap (Ethereum)
-PancakeSwap (BSC)
-Came…
🔔댓글 1개당 1,000원, 최대 100만 원 후원 예정 (1000명 참여시 종료)
매달 약 30만 원씩 후원하고 있으며, 다음 달에는 100만 원을 후원할 계획입니다
도배나 중복을 제외하고 한 번씩 댓글을 남겨주시면, 총합을 계산하여 다음 달에 다른 곳에 후원하도록 하겠습니다.
많은 참여 부탁드립니다. 감사합니다!"
- 참여 링크 -
💵Avalanche Ecosystem의 최신 프로젝트 랭킹 & Retro 9000
최근 Avalanche 생태계의 다양한 프로젝트를 모아볼 수 있는 Retro 9000 플랫폼이 주목받고 있고 특히 Memoria 프로젝트가 최근 커뮤니티에서 화제가 되면서 7위에 랭크
아발쪽 관심 있으신분들은 한번씩 읽어보시길 추천!!
원문
✅ 솔레이어 팀원, LIBRA 내부자 신상 정보 공개
Solana 리스테이킹 프로토콜 솔레이어(LAYER) 팀원으로 알려진 차오판 쇼우(Chaofan Shou) 가 자신의 X를 통해 아르헨티나 대통령 하비에르 밀레이(Javier Milei) 의 밈코인 $LIBRA 내부자들의 신상 정보를 공개
1️⃣ 내부자 신상 공개
차오판 쇼우(Chaofan Shou) 는 LIBRA 프로젝트 주요 팀 멤버 5명의 사진과 이름을 공개.LIBRA 글로벌 세일즈 총괄 리사 저우(Lisa Zhou)의 전화번호 및 소재지까지 폭로
2️⃣ 사건의 배경
차오판 쇼우는 자신과 동료가 LIBRA 토큰 투자로 200만 달러(약 26억 원) 손실을 입었다고 주장.그는 이전에 "두 명의 해커가 한가한 주말을 맞이하면 어떤 일이 생기는지 알려주겠다"는 의미심장한 발언을 남김
…
🎉 (핫한거 가져왔음) Fableborne WL 이벤트
❓Fableborne이란?
ARPG , 전략 베이스 구축 모바일 게임으로, 파워 프로토콜과 통합되어있음. 참고로 파워 프로토콜은 웹3 게임 라이브 운영 플랫폼이자 게임 퍼블리셔이며 곧 네이티브 토큰인 $POWER 출시 예정
✔️킹덤 NFT 민팅 정보 (WL Sale)
🟢세일 날짜: 02.19 22:00
🟢세일 플랫폼: 로닌 마켓 런치패드
🟢가격: 50$ RON
🟢수량: 2,822
✔️킹덤 NFT
🟢게임에서 중요한 역할
🟢스테이킹을 통해 $POWER 획득 가능
🟢동일한 레어리티의 합성으로 업그레이드 가능
🟢7가지 레어리티로 구성됨 (레어리티 높을수록 포인트 더 많이 획득)
✨ WL 이벤트
10 Spot 가지고 왔으니 관심있는 사람들은 구글폼 작성!!
3개는 숙제방 인원 추첨 / 6개…
🌧Hypers NFT WL X3 이벤트(필참)
하이퍼리퀴드 생태계에서 높은 하잎을 보여주고 있는 NFT
- 구글폼 작성
#Hypers
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Coinyoshi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2025 to 18 July 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 856,238 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“코인요시” (@Coinyoshi), 572 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Coinyoshi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
