Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

성연이의 바이브

@sy_vibe

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,379subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003515104903
TypeChannel
Username@sy_vibe
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sy_vibe

Growth

1,3771,3791,3786 Aug 2026, 19:17 — 1,377 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 08:41 — 1,379 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 19:177 Aug 2026, 08:41
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,377–1,379 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 08:411,379+2
6 Aug 2026, 19:171,377first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.7%
avg views ÷ 1,379 subscribers
Avg views / post
451
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.529%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held15 (31 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total6,759
Reactions total28
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

28 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1346.4%
1035.7%
🔥414.3%
😱13.57%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC128 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

https://x.com/i/status/2085365276640702915 GPT-ASTRA..? 지피티 아스트라? 레오 널 다시 믿어봐도 될까? 🥃🥃🥃🥃

🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC56 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @yeouidobi

정말 도움을 요청드리고 싶어 이렇게 올립니다. 정말 무거운 마음으로 이 글을 올리게됩니다. 저희 아버지는 대형회사에서 IT담당 임원으로 계십니다. 메모리가격 인상에 따라 계약을 재체결하는 과정에서 높은가격으로 재 계약을 진행하는 과정에서 제대로 이전 계약 마무리가 제대로 되지 못하고 진행이됨과 함께 최종 결재자가 되시면서 감사에서 계속해서 회사에 수백억에 가까운 손해를 입혔다고 압박을 받으시는것 같습니다. 결론이 나지 않았지만 수백억을 추징을 당할 수 있다는 압박감에… 좋지못한 선택을 시도하셨습니다. 혹시 이와관련하여 상담을 할 수 있거나 관련 전문가를 알고 계신분이 있다면 지나치치지마시고 한번만이라도 조언을 주시면 너무나도 감사하겠습니다. 제가 지금 당장 못하더라도 꼭 평생에 걸쳐서라도 보은하겠습니다

6 Aug 2026, 01:44 UTC278 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

메타의 Muse Spark 1.2 출시 😨😨😨 메타는 이제 정신 차렸나? 구글은 딥마인드에 있던 하사비스도 떠나버렸는데.. 구글은 대체 무슨생각인거야? 💞 😄😄😄

🔥3

5 Aug 2026, 00:05 UTC315 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

grok 4.6은 다음주 출시 예정 🔫🔫🔫 https://x.com/DeItaone/status/2084741238377296073

4 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC384 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://openaigame2026.com/#main 구독자분이 알려주신 코덱스 게임 해커톤인데 나쁘지않은듯 "수상작의 경우, 향후 게임 출시 시 Hive 연동이 권장될 수도 있습니다." 컴투스랑 같이 하는 해커톤이네요 💳💳

👍2

4 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC351 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

https://x.com/GoogleAIStudio/status/2083274575769473092 google ai studio 앱출시 취소... 뭐 3.5pro도 안내고 대체 뭘 준비하고 있는거야 젬미니4.0에 목숨걸었나..? 🤔🤔🤔

4 Aug 2026, 01:11 UTC365 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

minimax의 h3 출시, h3 출시로 개인 그래픽카드로 돌리는 이미지 생성 기술이 극대화 됐다고 하는데,, 이미지 생성ai 맛도 좀 봐볼까 싶음 🤔🤔🤔 새벽에 알리바바의 Qwen3.8 MAX 공개됐는데 벤치성능은 gpt5.6 솔이나 테라는 못이겼지만 소넷5랑 gpt5.6 루나는 이긴상태 생각보다 qwen3.8 max도 상당히 벤치 잘나왔네요 🏋️‍♂️🏋️‍♂️🏋️‍♂️

1👍1

2 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC402 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

이번주 AI 신모델 예상되는 리스트 - DeepSeek V4 Pro - Gemini 3.5 Pro - Grok 4.6 딥싴 v4 플러시가 벤치 사이트들에 나온 점수에 비해 생각보다 좋다는 의견들이 많은데 딥싴 v4 pro 출시가 이번주중으로 예상되고 있음 과연 딥싴 v4 pro가 어떤 결과를 가져올지 궁금하고 grok 4.6도 일론이 트윗쓰는거보니 이거도 4.6도 어떤맛일지 궁금하긴 하네.. 젬미니 3.5 프로는 출시 기대도 안하는중 🏋️‍♂️🏋️‍♂️🏋️‍♂️

2

2 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC644 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

이거 뭐지요 🤵 AI로 게임부활시키기 메타인가 https://retrogaming.dpdns.org/index.html

😱1

2 Aug 2026, 04:13 UTC≈1,190 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

어렸을때 되게 재밌게 했던 게임을 싱글모드로 부활시켜볼까 싶어서 시작했던 프로젝트 다크세이버는 현재 엠게임에서 '라피스' 라는 게임으로 서비스를 운영중이고 다크세이버는 엠게임 특성상 저작권 관련으로 더이상 리턴즈를 시켜줄것 같진 않아서 리버싱 추억 살릴겸 AI랑 같이 뚜닥거리면서 즐겨봤습니다 뭐 리버싱으로 이케저케 해서 회원가입 » 로그인 » 서버선택 » 캐릭생성이랑 DB 설계 뭐 이거저거 해서 최종 옵코드까지 맞춰서 구현을 하긴 했는데요 클라이언트 리버싱으로만은 한계가 있어서 이정도로 추억만 맛보고 프라이빗레포에 보내줄려고 합니다 한때 리버싱이 젤 재밌었던 보안꿈나무였는데 AI쓰면서 오랜만에 몇주동안 매달려서 해보니까 추억도 떠오르고 재밌었네요 굿 🏋️‍♂️🏋️‍♂️🏋️‍♂️ > 서비스종료된 게임은 리버싱이 빡세다. 서버가 존재하

5

2 Aug 2026, 01:58 UTC941 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

@mecaro @Kalhintz 두분과 scan2026 ctf 참여했는데요. 늦잠잤더니 만점자가 51팀이나 있네요.. 52등 했습니다.... 20팀 컷인데 아쉽네요 🙁

👍10

31 Jul 2026, 09:38 UTC517 viewsread 6 August 2026

다음주에 그록, 딥시크 프로 등이 출시를 기다리고 있는데 또 어떤 일들이 일어날려나 👊👊👊

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @sy_vibe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 329,023 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“성연이의 바이브” (@sy_vibe), 1,379 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sy_vibe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.